Memory Flashcards
Underwood + postman
Response to stimulus word testing retro and pro active interference
Found that both played a part and therefore recall was poor however only the case when stimuli were similar
McGeoch + McDonald
6 different lists to recall after a general list and found as the similarity in the lists fell the recall increased
Baddely + hitch
Rugby players who haven’t played as many games remember names from games three weeks ago than those who have
Tulving
Encoding specificity principle
Cues must be at encoding during learning and recall
Abernethy
Context dependent student learning
Godden and Baddely
Diver experiment
Baddely then realised context dependent effect only works for recall and not recognition
Carter and Cassaday
Anti-histamine state dependent
Atkinson and sheffrin
Multi-store model
Sperling
Flashed line
Miller
Millers magic number of 7+-2 for STM capacity
Jacob
Digit span measure asked to remember 4 and then 5 found average of 9.3 numbers and 7.3 letters
Peterson Peterson
N
Baddely
Semantically similar words shows LTM is coded semantically
Bahrick
Ex school friends
Young better at recalling
Photo 10% better than name
Glanzer + cunitz
Asked to recall a list of works in any order
First and last 5 most remembered
Recency- when still In STM
Primacy - when rehearsed enough to go to LTM