Memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Outline the procedures,findings and conclusions found by P+P.

A

P - participants were asked to recall a nonsense trigram at different 3 second intervals.
- to prevent rehearsal they used the brown Peterson technique in which participants had to count backs in 3s from a 3 digit number.
F - 3 - 90%
- 9 - 20%
- 18 - 2%
- 30 - 0%
C - STM has a duration of 18 - 30 seconds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In which year did Jacobs investigate STM and what did he investigate?

A

1887 - capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the procedures,findings and conclusions found by Jacobs.

A

A - To determine the capacity of STM.
P - A serial digit/letter span was used. This means that participants were presented with a series of numbers and letters and asked to recall them immediately after seeing them. After each correct recall another digit was added each time. A digit span was reached when participants are 50%.
F - Average digit span = 9.3% Average letter span = 7.3%.
- digit span increased(??) with age.
- participants ‘chunked’ to help them remember.
C - STM has a capacity of 7+/- 2 items.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the sensory register.

A

A store of sensory information (from the sensory receptors) that lasts no more than a few seconds but has a large capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which researcher in which year investigated the coding of long term memory?

A

Baddeley.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline the procedures,findings and conclusions found by Baddeley.

A

A - to determine the coding and duration of LTM and STM.
P - participants had to learn lists containing 4 semantically similar words ( e.g. Great, big, huge, wide), 4 acoustically similar words (e.g. Cat, mat, sat, hat), 4 acoustically dissimilar words (e.g. Mug, sat, eat, lie), and 4 semantically dissimilar words (e.g. Hug, sleep fight and tree).
- They were then asked to recall the word lists immediately and also 10 minutes later.
F - Immediately - participants recalled acoustically dissimilar words better than acoustically similar. There was little difference between the semantically similar and dissimilar words.
- After 20 minutes - Participants recalled semantically dissimilar words better than the semantically similar words. There was little difference between the acoustic lists.
C - STM = acoustic coding.
- LTM = semantic coding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define long term memory.

A

A permanent store holding unlimited amounts of information for an unlimited amount of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which researcher in which year investigated the duration of LTM?

A

Bahrick et al in 1975.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline the procedures,findings and conclusions found by Bahrick et Al.

A

A - to prove or disprove the existence of VLTM and investigate the quality of recall and recognition in the VLTM.
P - participants(392 graduates from an American high school) were shown photos of pupils from their yearbook. They were then asked a recall task in which they had to name the people in the photographs from only their memory. Finally they were asked to perform a recognition task in which they match names to the people I’m the photographs.
F - Recognition task = 90% correct after 14 years. 60% correct after 47 years.
- Recall task = 60% correct after 7 years. 20% after 47 years.
C - Recognition better in VLTM.
- People can recall certain information in VLTM but may need cues for other information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluate P+P’s research into STM.

A

✅ LAB - RELIABLE - VALID - LOW EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES

❌ LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate Jacob’s research into STM.

A

✅ ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - REMEMBERING PHONE NUMBERS.
- LAB - RELIABILITY - VALIDITY - LOW EX VARIABLES.

❌ - LAB - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS
ARGUABLY LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDY.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluate Baddeley’s research into coding.

A

✅ LAB - VALIDITY - RELIABILITY.

❌ LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY.
LAB - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS - LOW VALIDITY.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluate Bahrick et Al’s research into VLTM.

A

✅ LAB - HIGH CONTROL - VALID - RELIABILITY - LOW EX VARIABLES - CAUSE AND EFFECT.

❌ LOW VALIDITY - PEOPLE MAY HAVE HAD CONTACT SINCE HIGH SCHOOL.
RELIABILITY.
LAB - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who developed the multi - store model and in which year?

A

Atkinson and Shriffin 1968.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline the multi - store model.

A

The multi-store model of memory was developed in 1968 by Atkinson and Shriffin as the first attempt of explaining how memory works in the brain.
The model states that sensory memory contains the sensory register (a store that holds unlimited sensory information for a short amount of time) which receives sensory information (e.g. Smells and sounds) from the sensory receptors. Information can be lost from this register through decay.
In order to pass information from the sensory memory to the short term memory(STM) attention must be paid to it. The STM is a store that can hold 7+/-2 items of information for 18-30 seconds. Maintainence rehearsal occurs in this store to remember information. However information is also lost in this store through decay and DISPLACEMENT.
By performing elaborative rehearsal, information is passed from the STM into the long term memory (LTM). The LTM is a permanent store in which an unlimited capacity of information is held for an unlimited duration of time. However like the previous stores, information is lost through, decay, displacement but also retrieval failure.
Memory uses retrieval to recall information from the STM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluate the MSM.

A

✅ - There is supporting case study evidence. HM - anterograde amnesia after having brain tissue removed - couldn’t encode new ltm memories but STM unaffected - supports separate stores.
Clive wearing - virus gave him anterograde amnesia but he still had procedural ltm - playing piano.
- There is research evidence - P+P using the brown Peterson technique support the idea of rehearsal.
Baddeley showed LTM to be a separate store to STM.
- helped people to find a greater understanding of how memory works.
- serial position effect Murdock 1962.

❌ - OVER SIMPLIFIED - assumes there are single stm and ltm stores - Tulving and WMM disproves this.

  • The model is not linear - rehearsal is not the only way to remember things, Cohen believed that capacity was measured by nature of info not amount. - Flashbulb memory.
    - ignores the PROCESSES - that e.g. What is the process that allows us to draw information from ltm to understand STM, e.g. Understanding the language we’re hearing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Outline the working memory model.

A

The working memory model (WMM) is a model designed by Baddeley and hitch in 1971. It was developed ism response to the multi store model since it focuses on the active processes used during the short term storage of information.

Baddeley and hitch stated that memory has 4 components. The first of which is the central executive. This acts as the ‘boss’ of the system. It receives information from sensory receptors however has a limited capacity so decides which pieces of information receive attention. It then decides to which slave system this information is directed.
There are 2 slave systems, one being the phonological loop. This consists of the phonological store and the articulatory control system. The phonological store acts as the ‘inner ear’. It holds speech based information for a limited duration of 1.5-2 seconds. (Spoken words enter directly but written words must be converted into articulately code). The articulatory control system acts as the ‘inner voice’. It also holds information for 1.5-2 seconds but rehearses this information through sub-vocal repetition in order to remember it.
The remaining slave system is the Visuo-spatial sketch pad. It acts as the ‘inner eye’: containing visual and spatial information and the relationships between them, e.g. A students walk to school. Logie (1995) suggests that there are sub dividing stores. The visual cache which deals with information about form and colour and the inner scribe which stores information about the spatial relationships of items and rehearsals informations from the visual cache.
The final competent is the episodic buffer. This system integrates acoustic and visual information from the previous stores to creates memories that are to be transferred into the LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Evaluate the working memory model.

A

✅ - There is supporting case study evidence to prove the existence of seperate slave systems. KF suffered a motorbike accident which left him with brain damage to the left occipital lobe. His digit span was affected but could process visual and auditory information.

 - Takes emphasis off rehearsal and places it on processes. 
 - Application to real life - children with ADHD are believed to have impaired wm/ the us Air Force used the ability to do dual tasks as part of their recruitment. 
  - PET and fmri scans have been used to show a separation in slave stores. For example PET scans show that different brain areas are activated when doing visual and verbal tasks. Furthermore Bunge in 2000 proved that dual tasks produce more activity on fmri scans than single tasks. 
  - There is supporting research evidence. Baddeley and hitch in 1976 carried out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Define short term memory.

A

A temporary store in the brain that holds a limited amount of information for brief periods of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Define semantic LTM.

A

A form of long term memory for remembering meanings, understandings and other concept based knowledge. E.g. Historical facts and dates or phone numbers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Define procedural LTM.

A

A form of long term memory for remembering performance of oarticular types if actions. E.g. riding a bike or driving a car.

22
Q

Define episodic LTM.

A

A form of long term memory for remembering events occurring in an individual’s life. E.g. The birth if children or birthdays.

23
Q

Describe a case study that supports the existence if different stores if LTM.

A

Scott Bolzan suffered a fall at work which restricted the blood flow to his right temporal lobe and left him with retrograde amnesia. His STM remained intact however his LTM was affected. He could not remember the name of his wife let alone their wedding day (loss of semantic and episodic LTM). However he could remember how to walk (procedural LTM intact).

24
Q

Describe Tulving’s experiment in 1989.

A

A - to determine which areas of the brain deal with different types of information.
P - injected himself with radio active gold substance which he traced round his body using an MRI scanner. He then thought about his childhood memories followed by historical facts.
F - when thinking of childhood memories, his blood flow increased in the back of his brain. When thinking about historical facts, his blood flow increased in the front of his brain.
C - supports the idea if different parts of the brain dealing with different forms of memory and types of information.

25
Q

Describe how Corkin’s study of HM in 1968 supports the existence if procedural LTM.

A

A - to investigate HM’s long term memory.
P - Corkin taught him a motor skill.
F -At first he performed badly but he gradually improved. He could perform the task 3 days later but had no recollection of learning it.
C - procedural memory exists and is unconscious.

26
Q

Evaluate Tulving.

A

✅ - LAB - HIGH CONTROL - HIGH VALIDITY - LOW EX

❌ - INTROSPECTION - BIASED RESULTS DUE TO DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS.

 - CASE STUDY - LACK OF GENERALISABILITY  AND RELIABILITY. 
 - ETHICS - PHYSICAL HARM.
27
Q

Evaluate Corkin.

A

✅ - SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.
- HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY.

❌ - CASE STUDY - MISSING HIPPOCAMPUS - LOW GENERALISABILITY.

28
Q

Define proactive interference.

A

When past learning interferes with current attempt to learn something. E.g. Schemas affecting our opinion of people.

29
Q

Define retroactive interference.

A

When current attempts at learning something interfere with past learning. E.g. Leading question affecting eye witness testimony in police interviews.

30
Q

Which researcher in which year investigated proactive interference?

A

Underwood - 1957.
A - to find evidence for proactive interference.
P - carried out a meta-analysis of findings from studies using word list recall.
F - asked the day after learning, participants who learnt 15 word lists in one day had more trouble recalling the last word list they learnt (2⃣0⃣% RECALL❗️❗️) in comparison to participants asked to learn and recall only one word list (8⃣0⃣% RECALL❗️❗️).
C - proactive interference from the earlier word lists in the 15 list group was to blame for the lowered ability of recall.

31
Q

Which researchers in which year investigated retroactive retroactive interference?

A

Underwood and postman 1960.
A - To find evidence for retroactive interference.
P - laboratory study - independent group design - the control group were asked to learn a word list of paired words (e.g. Cat -tree) and then recall the second word paired with the first. The experimental group were asked to learn the same list but were also given a second paired word list. They were then asked to recall the second word paired to the first but only from the first list they had learnt.
F - Recall was better in the control group.
C - Retroactive interference caused the confusion in the experimental group since they had words from the second list confusing their recall.

32
Q

Evaluate Underwood’s meta analysis.

A

✅ - LAB - HIGH CONTROL - LOW EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES.

  • LAB - EXTERNAL RELIABILITY - SUPPORTS THEORY
  • EVIDENCE.

❌ - REDUCTIONIST - IGNORES THE PROCCESSES - ONLY EXPLAINS FORGETTING WHEN 2 SETS OF INFORMATION ARE SIMILAR.
- LAB EXPERIMENT - LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - DOES NOT EXPLAIN FORGETTING IN REAL LIFE SITUATIONS.

33
Q

Evaluate Underwood and Postman’s evidence.

A

✅ - LAB - HIGH CONTROL - LOW EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES.

  • LAB - EXTERNAL RELIABILITY - SUPPORTS THEORY
  • EVIDENCE - REAL LIFE APPLICATION - EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY - CIT INTERVIEWS + LEADING QUESTIONS.

❌ - LAB EXPERIMENT - LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - DOES NOT EXPLAIN FORGETTING IN REAL LIFE SITUATIONS.
- LAB - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS.

34
Q

Evaluate Baddeley’s and Godden’s research into retrieval failure.

A

✅ - REAL LIFE APPLICATION - CIT INTERVIEW - GAIN ACCURATE EWT + PREVENTION OF FORGETTING.
- FIELD EXPERIMENT - CONTROL OVER IV - CAUSE AND EFFECT - LOW EX VARIABLES.

 - LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY and THEREFORE GENERALISABILITY. 
 - OUTSHINING HYPOTHESIS - SMITH + VELA - CONTEXT EFFECTS ARE ELIMINATED WHEN LEARNING MEANINGFUL MATERIAL - REDUCTIONIST - TOO SIMPLE  BECAUSE A CUES EFFECTIVENESS IS REDUCED BY THE PRESENCE OF BETTER CUES. 
 - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS.
35
Q

Define weapon focus.

A

During a violent incident, a victim is likely to focus on the presence of a weapon rather than the criminal and therefore give poorer EWT.

LOWER LEVELS OF ANXIETY = POOR RECALL.

36
Q

What does the Yerkes-Dodson law state?

A

🔹 moderate anxiety is associated with better recall than either very high or very low anxiety.

37
Q

Outline the aims, procedures, findings and conclusions of Scott and Johnson’s 1976 investigation.

A

A - to investigate the effect of anxiety levels on accuracy of the recall of the witness and if weapons also have an effect on recall.
P - laboratory experiment - independent measure. The control group were placed in a waiting room and exposed to a low anxiety situation: hearing a discussion about broken equipment before a man with walks through the room with a greasy pen. The experiment group were then exposed to a high anxiety situation: hearing an argument (including glass smashing and chairs being thrown) before a man walks though the waiting room with a paper - knife and blood on his hands. The participants were then shown photos of men and asked to pick the one of the man who walked through the waiting room.
F - Recall of man was better in control group (low anxiety - 49%) than the experimental group (high anxiety 33%).
C - High anxiety worsened recall and weapon focused exists.

38
Q

Outline the aims, procedures, findings and conclusions of Yuille and Cutshall’s 1986 investigation.

A

A - to investigate the effects of anxiety on witness recall.
P - Natural experiment in which 13 witnesses of a real life shooting in Vancouver were interviewed 4-5 months after the shooting. They were compared to to original police interviews made at the time of the shooting. Participants were also asked to rate how stressed they were on a 7 point scale at the time of the event and if they have experienced any emotional problems since the event.
F - witnesses most distressed at the time of the event gave the best recall 5 months later (88% correct) compared to the lower stress group (77% correct).
C - heighten arousal improved later recall.

39
Q

Evaluate Johnson and Scott 1976.

A

✅ - FIELD - HIGH CONTROL - CAUSE AND EFFCT

 - LOW EX V - HIGH VALIDITY
 - EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT YERKES - DODSON.

❌ - ETHICS - PHYSICAL HARM.

  - ETHICS - DECEIT. 
  - EX VARIABLES?
40
Q

Evaluate Yuille and Cutshall 1989.

A

✅ - NATURAL EXPERIMENT - ETHICS - IV

 - NATURAL EXPERIMENT - HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY. 
 - APPLICATION TO REAL LIFE. 

❌ - INTERVIEWER EFFECTS - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS - LOW VALIDITY.

  - QUESTIONNAIRE - INTROSPECTION - BIASED. 
  - LOW CONTROL - NOT VALID - EX VARIABLES, E.G. PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE. 
  - UNETHICAL QUESTIONS - PHYSICAL HARM.
41
Q

In which hear did Petersons and Peterson carry out their experiment on STM and what was their aim?

A

1959 and to discover the duration of STM.

41
Q

Describe the case study of Steve Titus.

A

🔹 Was wrongly convinced of rape.
🔹 When shown a line of suspects, the victim picked Titus as being the attacker because he owned a car similar to that of the racist described.
🔹 He lost everything and suffered a stress related heart attack in his early 30’s. He was only proved innocent whe journalist found new evidence.
🔹 This shows that retro active interference causes people to create false information in order to fill in gaps in their memory.

42
Q

Define misleading information.

A

An incorrect suggestion that something has happened which didn’t happen.

43
Q

Define a leading question.

A

An example of misleading information: a question that biases the answer given.

45
Q

Evaluate Loftus and palmers research into misleading information.

A

✅ - LAB - VALID
- HIGH CONTROL - LOW EX V - CAUSE AND EFFECT

❌ - LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - NOT EXPERIENCING THE SITUATION ONLY SEEING IT.
- DE,WND CHARACTERISTICS.

46
Q

Outline the cognitive interview technique.

A

This is a type of structured interview developed In LA designed to improve EWT accuracy by asking certain questions and avoiding misinterpretation. It was designed to elicit more information than the standard interview technique.

CONTEXT REINSTATEMENT - witness is asked to recreate context of the event, picturing themselves within a mental reinstatement of the scene. E.g. Remembering smells and sounds. This is to provide any cues that made aid information.
ORDER - The witness is asked to recall the event in different orders, e.g. Finish to start. This is so that they do not leave chunks of the crime that they remember.
DETAIL - The witness is asked to recount the event in extreme detail. This is so that they do not forget to mention any information that may be importance. It is often done first to avoid the interviewer asking them questions which may mislead them with post - event information.
PERSPECTIVE - The witness is asked to recall the event from a different perspective. E.g. What would the woman on the other side of the road have seen? Again this is to make sure the witness does not forget to mention any detail that they may have missed at the crime scene due to high anxiety levels.

48
Q

Describe Loftus and Palmer’s investigation into misleading information (1974).

A

A - To investigate the effects of leading questions of memory recall.
P -Independent measure in which American students were shown a video of two cars colliding. Each condition were asked a question with a driftnet verb. E.g. How fast were the cars going when they contacted? Or How fast were the cars going when they hit?
F - The verb ‘contacted’ received the lowest speed estimate whereas the verb ‘smashed’ (31.8,ph) received the highest (40.8mph).
C - The wordings of questions, therefor leading questions, can change EWT.
Loftus also asked asked 2 follow up questions to 2 different groups of participants later. They we’re did you see a broken headlight? Or did you see the broken headlight? Participants asked the second question were most likely to agree even though there was no broken head light in the video they were shown.

52
Q

Evaluate the CIT.

A

✅ - SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.

❌ - TAKES TIME POLICE OFFICERS DONT HAVE.

 - TRAINING OF INTERVIEWER NEEDED - TIMELY AND COSTLY. 
 - INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES - studies have shown younger adults to be more success with cit than older ones. (Mello and Fisher 1996).
53
Q

Outline and evaluate the aims, procedures, findings and conclusions of Fisher’s et al’s 1989 research into the cognitive interview technique.

A

A - To investigate the effectiveness of CIT in a laboratory experiment.
P - A group of detectives in Florida were trained in how to use the CIT.
- Their performance was then observed.
F - There was a 47% increase in information produced by witnesses compared to pre-training levels.
C - The CIT produces more information than the standard interview technique.
✅ - HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDTY - REAL LIFE SETTING.
❌ - DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS - DUE TO INTERVIEWER EFFECTS.
- LOW POPULATION VALIDITY.

54
Q

Outline and evaluate the aims, procedures, findings and conclusions of Geiselman’s1988 research into the cognitive interview technique.

A

A -To investigate the effectiveness of CIT in a laboratory experiment.
P - 89 students were shown videos of police training videos of violent crimes. 48 hours later they were interviewed about what they saw using either the cognitive interview technique the standard interview technique. The interviews were analysed for the number of correct, incorrect and confabulated (made up) items recalled.
F - recall of correct. Items was higher with CIT than SIT. No difference in other 2 measurements.
C - CIT produces more accurate EWT than SIT.
✅ - LAB - HIGH CONTROL - LOW EX V.
- APPLICATION TO REAL LIFE - SUPPORTNG EVIDENCE.
❌ - LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - NO ANXIETY - INVALID RESULTS.
- LOW POPULATION VALIDY - ALL STUDENTS - LOW GENERALISABILITY.