Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Eyewitness

A

Someone who has seen or witnessed a crime, usually present at the time of the incident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Eyewitness testimony

A

The evidence provided in court by a person who witnessed a crime, with a view to identifying the perpetrator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Loftus and Palmer (1974) - Speed estimates according to verbs used (leading questions) (x4)

A
  • 45 student participants shown short films involving car accidents
  • Critical question = estimate the speed of the cars
  • Verbs varied: ‘hit’, ‘smashed’, ‘bumped’, ‘contacted’
  • The more ‘extreme’ the verb was in the question, the higher the average estimation of the cars’ travelling speeds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gabbert et al (2003) - Post-event discussion (x5)

A
  • 60 students and 60 older adults
  • Watched a video of a girl stealing money from a wallet (each group watched different perspectives)
  • Control group = tested individually, Co-witness group = tested in pairs
  • Co-witness group: 71% recalled information they had not seen, 60% said the girl was guilty (even though they had not seen her commit a crime)
  • Highlights the issue of post-event discussion and the effect of this on the accuracy of EWT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pickel (1998) - Is threat or unusualness the cause of weapon focus?

A

Man walking into a hair salon holding: (recall)
- Scissors (8.14)
- Handgun (7.83)
- Wallet (8.53)
- Raw chicken (7.21)
- Empty (9.02)

The handgun and raw chicken resulted in the lowest recall and therefore unusualness rather than anxiety / threat may explain the ‘weapon focus’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Yuille and Cutshall (1986) - Can anxiety have a positive effect? (x5)

A
  • Studied a real-life shooting in a gun shop in Canada
  • The shop owner shot a thief dead
  • Little change in EWT after 5 months
  • Participants who reported high levels of stress were most accurate (88% compared to 75% for the less-stressed group)
  • Anxiety has a positive effect - leading questions have little effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Yerkes-Dodson law - Inverted U theory

A
  • Performance will increase with stress, but only to a certain point, where it decreases drastically.
  • Supported by Deffenbacher (1983)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Anxiety (x2)

A
  • An unpleasant emotional state where we fear something bad is about to happen.
  • One argument is that anxiety creates physiological arousal in the body which prevents us paying attention to important cues so recall is worse.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Weapon focus

A

Looking at the effect of weapons (which create anxiety) on accuracy of recall of the witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Effect of weapon focus

A

In violent crimes, arousal may focus the witness on more central details of the attack (e.g weapon) than the more peripheral details (e.g what else was going on and what the perpetrator looked like).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Johnson and Scott (1976) - Anxiety has a negative effect on EWT (x5)

A
  • Whilst seated in a waiting room, participants heard an argument in the next room.
  • In the low-anxiety condition a man walked through the waiting area carrying a pen with grease on his hands.
    -In the high-anxiety condition the argument was accompanied by the sound of breaking glass, and a man walked out of the room holding a paper knife that was covered in blood.
  • 49% of the low-anxiety condition correctly identified the man, whereas only 33% did in the high-anxiety condition.
  • The tunnel theory of memory argues that a witness’ attention narrows to focus on a weapon because it is a source of anxiety.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Components of the cognitive interview - Fisher and Geiselman (1992)

A
  • Report everything
  • Reinstate the context
  • Reverse the order
  • Change perspective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cognitive interview - Report everything

A
  • Saying everything that you saw
  • Memories act as cues to trigger other memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cognitive interview - Reinstate the context

A
  • Going back mentally to the event
  • Prevents context-dependent forgetting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cognitive interview - Reverse the order

A
  • Chronological shift (e.g recalling in reverse order)
  • Prevents schemas from filling gaps in memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cognitive interview - Change perspective

A
  • Recalling information from someone else’s perspective
  • Disrupts the effect of expectations and schemas on recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Capacity

A

The amount of information that can be stored in memory.

18
Q

Duration

A

How long a memory trace can last.

19
Q

Coding

A

The form in which a memory trace is created.

20
Q

MSM components

A
  • Sensory store
  • Short term memory (working memory)
  • Long term memory
21
Q

MSM - Sensory store

A
  • Senses pick up information (visual, auditory, haptic)
  • Capacity = huge
  • Duration = short (1-2 seconds)
22
Q

MSM - Short term memory

A
  • Capacity = 7+/- 2 items
  • Duration = 18-30 seconds
  • Encoding = acoustic
  • Information will decay if it isn’t rehearsed, or if new information enters STM and pushes out the original information due to STM’s limited capacity (displacement).
23
Q

MSM - Long term memory

A
  • Capacity = infinite
  • Duration = infinite / lifetime
  • Encoding = semantically
  • Information is moved from STM to LTM via maintenance rehearsal.
  • Initially rehearsal just maintains the information in STM but the more something is rehearsed the longer the lasting memory will be.
  • Elaborate rehearsal can increase memory if linked to stories.
24
Q

Working memory model - features

A
  • Central executive
  • Visuospatial sketchpad
  • Episodic buffer
  • Phonological loop
  • Long term memory
25
Q

WMM - Central executive

A
  • Directs attention to tasks - decides what working memory pays attention to.
  • Controls the ‘slave systems’ - other 3 components.
  • Data arrives from the senses or from LTM.
  • Limited capacity.
26
Q

WMM - Phonological loop

A
  • Limited capacity - holds 2 seconds worth of info.
  • Auditory information
  • Codes acoustically
  • Phonological store (holds words heard) - inner ear
  • Articulatory process / loop (holds words heard / seen and silently repeated) - inner voice
27
Q

WMM - Visuospatial sketchpad

A
  • Visual and/or spatial information stored here
  • Limited capacity
  • Visual cache (stores information about visual items)
  • Inner scribe (for spatial relations which stores the arrangement of objects)
28
Q

WMM - Episodic buffer

A
  • Buffer extra storage system but with limited capacity
  • Integrates information from all other areas
  • Maintains a sense of time sequencing
29
Q

Dual task paradigm

A
  • If you try and do 2 verbal tasks at the same time, performance is poor.
  • You can perform two tasks at the same time, as long as you are using two different components of the working memory model.
30
Q

Endel Tulving (1967) - 3 types of LTM

A
  • Epsiodic memory
  • Semantic memory
  • Procedural memory
31
Q

Episodic memory (x3)

A
  • Involves conscious thought and is declarative
  • 3 specific elements: details of the event, the event, the emotion
  • Associated with the hippocampus and right prefrontal cortex (Tulving 1994)
32
Q

Semantic memory (x4)

A
  • Meaning of words and general knowledge
  • Involves conscious thought and is declarative
  • Often start as episodic memories but they are not time stamped (they do not remain associated with an event)
  • Associated with the left prefrontal cortex (Tulving 1994)
33
Q

Procedural memory (x3)

A
  • Knowledge of how to do things / carry out complex tasks
  • It does not involve conscious thought and is non-declarative
  • Associated with the cerebellum and motor cortex
34
Q

Declarative

A

Knowing that

35
Q

Non-declarative

A

Knowing how

36
Q

Interference (x2)

A
  • When 2 pieces of information conflict with each other
  • This can result in forgetting one or both pieces of information, or a distortion of memory
37
Q

Retroactive interference

A

When a newer memory interferes with an older one.

38
Q

Proactive interference

A

Occurs when an older memory interferes with a newer one.

39
Q

Context dependent forgetting

A

External environmental cues

40
Q

State dependent forgetting

A

Internal cues

41
Q

Retrieval failure

A

Forgetting due to a lack of cues

42
Q

Encoding specificity principle

A

Tulving: cues most effective if present at coding and at retrieval.