melanoma Flashcards
sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma
MSLT1 trial results
M1c
non-lung visceral
Response rates melanoma
DTIC 10-15; IL2 16, cis 14-29, taxol 14-21
CVD
40-44%
carbo/taxol melanoma
11,18% RR, no OS benefit to DTIC
melanoma RTK RAS path
RTK->RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-cell prolif
dabrafenib/tremetinib CNS
works in CNS
vemurafenib v. dabrafenib response
similar efficacy, only a fraction are primarily resistant (10-15%)
adverse effects BRAFi
karatinocyte proliferations, hand/foot, SCC, hair thinning, fatigue, fever (more with dabrafenib), prolonged QTc
trametinib v. DTIC
improved survival (not as robust as with RAFi), no indication as single agent, more to than RAFi
dabrafenib+trametinib
RR increased (76%), increased PFS (9.4 v. 5.8), toxicities are somewhat ameliorated.
acral/mucosal melanomas
20% KIT mutation, responds to imatinib
UV light and melanoma
UVB is more closely linked.
hereditary melanoma
10% of cases. p16/CDKN2A. 30-90% risk of melanoma if carrier of mutation. also pancreatic cancer. BRCA2 as well.
mutations in melanoma
BRAF 50-60%, NRAS 25-20%. uveal GNAq/GNA11, acral c-KIT
bbbiopsy of suspicious skin lesions
1-2mm margin complete excision is best. If highly suspicoius, shave or curettage contraindicated
mucosal melanom
acral lentiginous, c-KIT most comon
recurrence with regional ln
if 1+ LN, then 50% reisk of recurrence. Multiple is 75% risk recurrence
melanoma staging
stage III: LN+; M1c: elevated LDH or non-lung visceral mets.
evaluation of low-risk melanoma
low risk:
imaging for local melanoma
indicated for high risk stage II (i.e. >4mm) or LN+ (stage III)
sentinal LN biopsy for melanoma
consider for ANY high risk features (i.e. MI>1, ulceration, or >1mm)
adjuvant therapy for melanoma
consider for >4mm (IIB- no ulceration, IIC- ulceration) or stage III (+LN)
margins of resection needed for melanoma
1cm; 1-2mm–> 1-2cm, 2-4mm–>2cm, >4mm–> at least 2cm