MEE Rule Statements Flashcards

1
Q

A proper arrest is one that is based on

A

probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Facts supporting probable cause may come from

A

a number of different sources, including a police officer’s personal observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A warrantless search is invalid if it is

A

reasonable in scope and if it is made incident to a lawful arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

under the plain view doctrine, if an item is in public view it may

A

be seized without a warrant since there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for such an item.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The fourth amendment does not require police to obtain a warrant to search a vehicle if

A

they have probable cause to believe it contains contraband or evidence of a criminal activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

custodial interrogation is

A

questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A person under arrest is

A

in custody and any police questioning of the person under arrest would thus be custodial interrogation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Questioning of a suspect by a police officer subsequent to arrest must be

A

preceded by miranda warnings and a waiver or the suspect’s miranda rights are violated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If questioning of a suspect was a custodial interrogation that violated miranda, the suspect’s statement during that custodial interrogation would be

A

excluded from the prosecution’s case in chief. but the exclusion does not apply to statements the suspect makes in response to subsequent interrogation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Violations of miranda do not necessarily support the

A

fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interrogation of an arrestee must stop once

A

the arrestee invokes the right to counsel under the 5th amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The interrogation must stop until

A

counsel is present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The right to counsel under the 5th amendment is not

A

automatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In order to invoke the 5th amendment right to counsel, the defendant must

A

make a specific, unambiguous statement that he wishes to have counsel present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A person has a 4th amendment right to be free from

A

unreasonable seizure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A person is seized by the police when

A

the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, terminates or restrains freedom in such a way that a reasonable person would believe that he was not free to leave

17
Q

the 4th amendment permits detention of an individual for

A

a brief period of time if the police have a reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts that the individual in question has been recently involved in criminal activity.

18
Q

Whether reasonable suspicion exists is based on the

A

totality of the circumstances.

19
Q

any statement obtained as the result of custodial interrogation may

A

not be used against the suspect at a subsequent trial unless the police provided procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination.

20
Q

An interrogation refers not only to questioning, but also to

A

any words or actions that the police know or should know are likely to elicit an incriminating response.