MEE hot topicsw Flashcards
What is an agency relationship
a fiduciary relationship that arises when one person the principal appoint another the agent to act on the principal’s behalf and the agent consents to act
Capacity required for the creation
principals must have contractual capacity
agents must have minimal capacity
formalities of an agency
- consent
- writing is not required but the SOF may require one
What are an agent’s duties to the principal
- care
- loyalty
- obedience
Duty of Loyalty
agent owes a duty of treating the principal fairly which includes:
- can’t profit for themselves
- act for benefit of principal
- refrain from dealing with principal as an adverse party
- agent may not compete with principal
- may not use the principal’s property for own purpose
Duty of care
an agent owed a duty to their principal to carry out their agency with reasonable care
duty of obedience
an agent must obey all reasonable directions of their principal and if they don’t then the agent will be liable for any losses suffered
principal’s remedies for breach
include:
- contract actions
- tort actions
-actions for secret profits
- equitable actions for an accounting
- imposition of a constructive trust
-withholding of compensation
actual authority
principal’s words/conduct lead a reasonable person in the agent’s position to believe that the agent has authority to act on the principal’s behalf
What is the difference between implied and express actual authority
can be express: actually contained in the four corners of the agency agreement (oral or written)
Or implied: agent reasonably believes they have as a result of the principal’s actions or words
termination of actual authority
- happening of an event
- lapse of a reasonable time
- change in circumstances
- agent’s breach of fiduciary duty
- either party’s unilateral termination
- operation of law
Apparent authority
principal’s words or conduct lead a reasonable person in the third party’s position to believe the agent has authority to act on the principal’s behalf and would have apparent authority to bind the principal
When agent exceeds authority
- Prior act: principal let agent exceed express/implied authority and knows the third party is aware then the principal is bound through apparent authority
- power of position: established through an agent’s title or position and that position customarily carries certain responsibilities the principal is liable
lingering apparent authority
had given an agent actual authority at one point and third parties knew but then you took it away and people still believe they have that authority.
- may need to give notice of termination
- recover via written authority
- death/incompetence of principal doesn’t automatically terminate agent’s apparent authority
Ratification effect
even if an agent didn’t have authority at the time of entering into a K the principal will be bound if they ratify the contract
Requirements for ratification
principal must:
1. have knowledge of (or reason to know) all material facts regarding the K
2. accept the entire transaction AND
3. have capacity
requires no consideration
Third party vs agent
Bound unless principal’s existence and identity are disclosed
Exception: existence/identity of principal isn’t disclosed - if judgment not satisfied by agent and they find ID of principal they can sue them later
third party v principal
bound if valid authority existed (actual, apparent, or ratification)
Employee vs independent contractor
Employee: the principal/employer retains the right to control the manner in which an employee perform their work
independent contractor: principal doesn’t have a right to control the manner in which work is performed
can look at: skill required, tools used, period of employment, basis of compensation, business purpose, distinct business
Scope of employment for torts
Employer liable for employees torts only if they are committed in the scope of the employee’s employment
Consider:
1. conduct of the kind they were hired to perform
2. did the tort occur on the job
3. was the conduct actuated at least in part to the benefit of the employer
frolic v detour
Frolic: major deviation requiring substantial departure from employment is beyond the scope
Detour: small deviation from employer’s direction is in the scope of employment
Intentional torts
employer is not liable unless
1. natural incident of employee’s duties
2. whether the employee is promoting the employer’s business or motivated to serve the employer
3. authorized or ratified by employer
Formation of general partnership
association of two or more people to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit and is formed as soon as that happens
2 main factors for deciding is a partnership exists
- sharing of profits - presumption
- right to participate in control
Partnership existence rebuttable presumption
show lack of co-ownership relationship like no control or not sharing losses
additional evidence of a partnership
- title to property held in joint tenancy or in common
- parties designate their relationship as a partnership
3, venture undertaken by the parties requires extensive activity - sharing of gross returns
voting
all partners have equal rights in management of business decisions unless otherwise state
ordinary course: majority vote
outside ordinary course: unanimous
renumeration
partners have no right to renumeration for their services to the partnership except for winding up the partnership bsuiness