Medical Malpractice & Informed Consent Flashcards
Medical Malpractice
- Standard of Care – must be set my medical professionals
- Role of Custom – is custom local or national? What about innovative treatments
- Questions of Proof
Prima Facie Medical Malpractice Case
- P must affirmatively prove the relevant recognized standard of medical care and that D departed from that standard
- P must present expert witnesses since technical complexity prevents jury from determining the appropriate standard of care
* *THERE CAN BE NO NEGLIGENCE WITHOUT EXPERT TESTIMONY TO SUPPORT IT!
Sheeley v. Memorial Hospital
- Ruled in favor of national standard of care
- clarified that expert witnesses do NOT have to come from exact field as D BUT must come from same medical field as alleged malpractice
- *BOARD CERTIFIED should be presumptively qualified
– trial judge has the discretion to determine expert witness’ qualifications
Matthies v. Mastromonaco
- informed consent applies to both invasive and noninvasive procedures
- Reasonable Patient Standard + Material Risk
- Failure to obtain informed consent is a form of medical negligence
Reasonable Patient Standard
Physician is obligated to disclose only information material to reasonable patients informed decision
– measuring materiality is based on whether a reasonable patient (in the patient’s position) would have considered the risk material to assure informed consent
Doctrine of informed consent
Did physician adequately present the material facts so patient can make an informed decision?
For consent to be informed, the patient must know not only the alternatives the physician recommends but the medically reasonable alternatives the physician does not recommend
FAILURE TO OBTAIN INFORMED CONSENT IS A FORM OF MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE!
Reasonable person can be slightly subjective to P BUT cannot be too subjective.
Physicians standard of care
National standard
- Dr’s make their own standards/customs and cannot be overruled by jury
- residents are held to the same standards as doctors
Expert Witness
Must come from same field as alleged malpractice
–board certified in same field as alleged malpractice = automatically qualified
Consent v. Custom
Consent - I didn’t consent because I didn’t know and understand the risks of the procedure
Custom - execution was wrong (medical malpractice); b/c you didn’t adhere to custom, you enhanced the risks of the procedure
Objective Standard of Causality
What would a reasonable patient, in the patient’s position, have decided if suitably informed?