Medical interview common questions Flashcards
Why do you want to go to Medical School?
This is a common question, so reflect carefully on the answer prior to interview
In order to answer it properly, you will need to first understand what exactly being a medical student and a doctor entails. This comes from research, work experience and talking to people ahead of you on the pathway
Aim to strike a good balance between passion and pragmatism — many people come across disproportionately one way or the other
Provide enough detail to be persuasive, but avoid waffling. More than three points is usually too much and impact will be lost
Get across your desire to interact with – and ultimately help — people. This is what being a doctor is all about
Try to capture why the combination of scientific drive and human engagement involved in Medicine appeals to you
Use examples from work experience and your personal life throughout to personalise and strengthen your answer
Common Mistakes:
Knowing you want to be a doctor but not being able to articulate why. This is usually a result of a lack of reflection
Referring to financial rewards or social status: these are not good motivators and there are other careers that offer more of both
Saying that you come from a family of doctors. This is not a mistake in itself, but you must stress that you have done your own exploration
If you were not offered a place to study Medicine, what would you do?
Saying you would apply again next year, and perhaps try to get a job or volunteering post in a related area in the meantime, shows commitment
Stressing that you would remain committed to the pathway in the face of a setback is a good demonstration of your desire to study Medicine
Show that you can turn misfortune to your advantage by outlining how you would make the most of the time – to gain more experience in healthcare for example
Perhaps suggest that you could try nursing or a related healthcare degree because they also involve patient care and that is ultimately what you’re interested in
Common Mistakes:
Simply saying ‘I will get in’ shows arrogance, rather than strength — and might tempt them to prove you wrong!
Saying straight away that you would do something unrelated suggests a lack of commitment and resolve
What aspects of the working life of a doctor appeal to you?
Hopefully you find it rewarding to help people who need it, and make a difference in peoples’ lives. So say so – and don’t be too afraid of sounding cheesy
Remember: as a doctor, you have the chance to make a real difference to peoples’ lives every day that you go to work
Patient care and disease management, alongside the medical research that takes place, is intellectually stimulating
It is a multi-faceted job that presents you with many exciting challenges
If you enjoy teamwork and problem-solving that will also be a big draw
Consider the diversity of opportunities available to healthcare professionals
Use work experience and other first-hand experiences to support the things that you say — make the answer personal to you
Consider mentioning that you are also aware that it is extremely challenging and stressful but that you believe the positives outweigh the negatives
Common Mistakes:
Focusing on career advancement, respect and remuneration
Saying that the life of a doctor is entirely positive and failing to appreciate the emotional difficulty involved
What aspects of the working life of a doctor don’t appeal to you?
Show that you understand, from research and work experience, that being a doctor comes with a lot of challenges
Without belittling these challenges, also keep a positive outlook and demonstrate that you are up for the challenge
Example: being a doctor can be very stressful and requires a huge commitment, which might restrict your personal or family life. However, there might also be good ways of finding a work-life balance that work for you
Example: death of patients is an inevitable part of being a doctor — show that you recognise that this will be an incredibly difficult thing to deal with. However, you can also refer to the support available for doctors experiencing difficulties with this
Remember, there is a huge range of opportunities available to a doctor. You will develop more of a sense of what you are best suited to as you move through Medical School
Common Mistakes:
Being blindly positive. Positivity is an excellent trait but not at the expense of realism
Saying that everything appeals and you can think of nothing that would be difficult about being a doctor shows a lack of appreciation for the realities
Referring too much to NHS cuts and working long hours for relatively small remuneration could make you seem like you have the wrong priorities
Can non-scientific hobbies add to a person’s ability to be a good doctor, and why? Can you think of any examples in your own case?
Medicine isn’t just a scientific career. It is people-based and therefore requires doctors to be well-rounded people who can relate to others
Non-scientific interests can help doctors achieve this, and relate to patients who don’t have a deep scientific understanding of their situation
Some universities, like Imperial, focus a lot on extracurricular as a sign of well-rounded candidates; find out each university’s stance beforehand
If you play music / sport / paint / do comedy / other, tell them about it and try to articulate why this might make you are stronger candidate
Extracurricular activities can demonstrate skills relevant to Medicine; sports people often show teamwork and leadership, for instance. Use extracurricular achievements to signpost doctor-worthy traits.
Example: I love playing the guitar, and have played in bands in my town for several years. It is a great way of meeting new people, and playing music together is one of the most enjoyable things I do. I would like to continue playing guitar alongside my medical studies, as I feel it could provide catharsis during stressful times. Patients or colleagues might also enjoy listening or playing music together!
Common Mistakes:
Focussing too much on extracurricular agendas at the expense of the Medical School. Remember, not everyone shares the same interests as you
Being dismissive of non-academic pursuits and saying things like ‘a doctor’s ability to diagnose illness is really the most important part’
Have you thought about what you would like to specialise in?
You don’t have to be certain. In fact, if you are it might seem a little strange, since you are only 17 and have a lot to learn. So make sure you are interested but open
Pick something that might interest you to show awareness of the specialities out there. This is your chance to show off about a book you’ve read, research you’ve followed, or a time (maybe on work experience) when you’ve truly been inspired
If you are going to choose something, it might be better if it is a general speciality because it shows you are still open to the wider possibilities Medicine offers. Choosing something too niche might make it seem like you are studying Medicine as a whole for the wrong reasons
Your answer should be focused on your interest: why a certain pathway appeals to you and how skills you already have now match that speciality
Know how long training for your chosen speciality is. They may ask you and it’s good to show you have done some research and have realistic expectations.
Make it clear that you’re aware that your view can change; that you’re excited to be exposed to all aspects of Medicine; and that you’ve got 5/6 years (hopefully at this Medical School) to make that decision.
Common Mistakes:
Being overly specific. There’s a danger of getting questioned on topics you don’t understand. In this case, never lie. Talk about the experience/knowledge of this speciality that you do have – and admit you don’t know it all
Being negative about certain specialities. You don’t really know enough about any aspect of Medicine yet to rule out anything and you need to show them your hunger to learn new things
Have you read about any interesting research recently?
Have a specific example ready. There’s always research in the news. They don’t expect you to know everything back to front, but as a rule it’s good to have awareness about as much as possible and a deep understanding about a few select topics
When introducing some research, don’t waffle. Mention the key points: topic, method, outcome, what you found interesting. If the interviewers want to know more then they will probe further
Strongly consider looking at the research that the Medical School has recently put out. You could pick one of those studies to talk about. You will score extra points for pointing out that certain research was pioneered at a certain medical school/hospital
Common Mistakes:
Mentioning an unreliable source, such as a tabloid newspaper. If you do, say that you looked up the original study or that you looked at the NHS news app which presents unbiased analysis of the health stories in the news and provides the main points of the studies/claims
Saying you’ve read something you haven’t or pretending to know something you don’t. If you don’t know the answer to a specific question, don’t panic. They want to find out what you do know. You can show off your independent thinking and potential by stating that whilst you don’t know, maybe it has to do with
What have you learnt about being Medicine from the doctors you’ve spoken to?
Talk about the doctors you’ve encountered on your work experience, or through other interactions, perhaps on a personal level, as a patient or a relative of a patient
Show understanding of the daily schedule of a (specific type of) doctor: what they do routinely, what challenges they face and the ways in which they overcome the challenges (through team work, communication skills etc.)
Show a realistic understanding of working hours, job stress, and the huge responsibility that doctors carry. But balance this by talking about the rewarding aspects of the job and how stress can be managed
Acknowledge that there’s so much more to learn and that’s there’s some aspects which you can only fully understand through experience
Common Mistakes:
Basing your answer on opinions. Stay focused on the practical aspects of Medicine that you’ve learnt about
Being overly negative. While realism is appreciated, you must also showcase your determination, positivity and appetite for a challenge
What do you think is the most exciting development in Medicine recently?
Do the work before the interview
Keep up to date with medical news in the build up to your interview and keep interesting articles about medical developments. Read around them and add them to your personal portfolio so you can revisit them before interview
Pick a specific example which really stands out to you. It should be one that will benefit a lot of people — or has the potential to do so in the future
Be clear and concise in your description: what it is, who’s working on it, where did you come across it and why you think it’s significant/interesting
Say how you think it will affect clinical practice and better the lives of patients. By thinking about this ahead of time, rather than in real time in the interview chair, you will come across as a strong candidate
Common Mistakes:
Getting too technical. Yes, it looks good if you can speak with some authority on the science. But stick to what you are comfortable with and understand
Relying on a poor source. If you start talking about something based on a tabloid article, you might come unstuck. Stick to authoritative sources, like the NHS, BBC, Student BMJ or New Scientist
Have you taken on any extracurricular projects that demonstrate your interest in Medicine?
Good examples include research placements, EPQs, essays, blogs, first aid training – and any other type of healthcare-based work outside the regular science curriculum
Example: some sixth forms encourage students to become health champions and educate other students on issues such as alcohol abuse and obesity. If your school doesn’t do this, why not suggest it? Then you can say you pioneered it at interview
Speak about your involvement with your Medical Society at school. If you are not heavily involved, correct this before your interview. If you’re school doesn’t have a Medsoc, start one! There’s a guide in the Teacher Services section of our website
Start by briefly introducing and explaining the project. Then focus on why you chose it, what you learnt and what particular aspects of the project you enjoyed the most.
Indicate that undertaking said project has inspired you take on similar projects in the future. Bonus points for linking this with the structure of the university’s course (SSCs, library projects, intercalated degrees etc.)
Common Mistakes:
Getting too caught up in the technicalities of the specific project. The most important aspect of your answer should be demonstrating your interest, and your willingness to put in time outside of your studies to pursue your interest. Don’t give everything away; they can always ask follow up questions
Giving the impression that what you’ve done so far is the only thing that you’re interested in. You should state that you want to learn about and take on new and different medically-related projects as well
Are you aware of the main method of teaching at this Medical School? What do you think are the advantages of this style of teaching?
It is absolutely essential that you know exactly what course structure the Medical School uses. Is it traditional/tutorial style, integrated, or PBL?
Read more about these course types generally on our website. But also read the university’s material to find out exactly how they use the structure. There are nuances involved
Make sure you are using very up-to-date information: universities change structure. For example, Cardiff now use a variation on PBL called Case-Based Learning (CBL)
Run through how the structure works — both in generally and specifically at this university – and, crucially, why you think it is an excellent way to learn and why it suits you very well
Focus more on the positives of the course structure they use, rather than fixating on the negatives of other systems
Some lecture-based advantages: dissemination of information is more consistent from lectures, and one can be sure that the information is correct and relevant to the course and exams. It means that everybody receives the same body of material, and thus a level playing field for the exams
Some PBL advantages: working in teams and developing people skills are central to the medical profession, and as such PBL can be a good way to simulate this working style. The earlier you get used to working together in teams, with the challenges this brings, the better
Be aware of whether the medical school does/does not offer dissection as part of the anatomy teaching, and be prepared to speak about the advantages of either approach
Common Mistakes:
Not knowing the course type. Saying something like ‘I don’t really know but imagine that there will be a mixture of lectures and practical sessions’ is very unimpressive
Knowing the course type used but not being able to speak about it in detail. How can you commit to something to a number of years without understanding it?
Saying that it doesn’t really matter to you because you are confident in your ability to thrive in any learning environment. That’s not accurate: it does matter
Do you think cadaveric dissection is important for medical students?
First, you should know whether this is something that the Medical School you’re applying to does or not, and factor this into your thinking
On the positive side, it could be a good way to learn about the body, as plastic models and animations can only ever approximate anatomical structures
It also brings certain gravity to anatomy teaching, and dissecting a real human body can be a very inspiring and humbling experience
However, cadavers are not the only way to learn anatomy. Sometimes models can be helpful to generalise structures or represent things in a slightly different way that aids with one’s learning of a particular structure
Sometimes abstractions are the best way of learning about something, while seeing the real thing is the most effective way of understanding it. Therefore, a mix of cadaveric dissection and model-based teaching is probably a desirable thing
Common Mistakes:
Not knowing what cadaveric dissection is. This is a key part of learning about the body and you have to get to grips with it
Not knowing what the university’s stance is. This leaves you playing an uncomfortable guessing game, where you do not know whether to expound the positives or be more withdrawn
Expressing trepidation (e.g. ‘I think I would find that revolting and probably wouldn’t want to try those sessions out’). The human body is what Medicine is all about
Saying that you don’t think that cadavers can be very useful, because doctors work with living patients and not dead ones
Why did you put this medical school as your first choice?
Make clear that you considered the type of teaching of the Medical School and how it is used, compared it to various others
If course structure has not already been covered as a standalone question, make clear why you think that their course structure is a great fit for you
Pick out any key unique selling points that make this university stand out, and explain why you think they are important
Once you have covered the course, you can talk about the extracurricular activities and societies at the university
A good approach is to say that you are looking for somewhere that offers excellence in teaching, as well as good opportunities to get involved in extra-curricular activities
Make it clear that you are really passionate about their Medical School by saying something like ‘I would be delighted to have the chance to study here’’
Common Mistakes:
Emphasising the location before anything else. For example, saying you want to attend a great institution like Imperial ‘because it’s in Central London and living in South Kensington would be cool.’ Start with the course!
Not knowing the course structure properly and consequently saying things that demonstrate a lack of knowledge, such as ‘I like the PBL teaching approach’ when PBL is not used at the Medical School
Talking about anything to do with nightlife or bars!
Are you aware of the catchment area of the teaching hospitals that this Medical School has?
This is another essential to famiarise yourself with before the interview
First, you need to know the process: what is the relationship between Medical Schools and their teaching hospitals and how does this help improve your training towards becoming a doctor
It is essential you know which hospitals are associated with the Medical School, what they are like and where they are. They aren’t always very close!
Therefore, you will be able to tell them you know that the school is associated with hospitals in x area, and that you like the idea of being sent on placement to hospitals in that area
It is important as a Medical Student to get a window into as many parts of the NHS as possible, so being sent on placement to the various hospitals associated with this Medical School will be a good opportunity to do that
Common Mistakes:
Not understanding the concept of teaching hospitals and how their association with the Medical School works
Not knowing which hospitals are associated with the university
Saying that you are aware that students can get sent to regional hospitals but that you hope that you are able to do all your placements in the city, as it will be far more convenient and exciting
This university offers a wide range of extra-curricular societies reflecting the diversity of students and courses we have here. If you were a student here, which societies would you be interested in joining?
Remember that some universities, like Imperial, place a lot of emphasis on extracurricular activity because it demonstrates you are a well-rounded candidate
If you are not interested in anything other than Medicine, you may look too insular, so you should have thought about this and had a look at what societies are available at the university
If there is something that you already do, like a sport, then that will be a natural thing to bring up. If you can cite something particular about this university’s club (e.g. their results last year) that is a plus
Example: I would like to get involved with the x (e.g. hockey) society, because it has been a hobby of mine for some years, and I feel I could contribute to the university team, who got to the semi-finals last year
If you do not have a natural fit, show that you are proactive and open-minded by speaking about some things you haven’t tried before but would like to at university
Example: I would like to try out x (e.g. karate), because I have not tried it before and I would really like to see if it is something I enjoy.
Example: I would like to learn about x (e.g. Arabic) because it has always fascinated me, but I have never had the opportunity to pursue this.
Common Mistakes:
Being dismissive of extracurricular activities and not seeming like a well-rounded candidate. Saying something like ‘I imagine I will have too much studying to be doing to be getting involved in any activities like this’ is dangerous ground
Being closed minded and saying something like ‘trying new things is not something that I am really interested in’ or ‘I already am part of clubs for all of the activities that I enjoy doing, and so would not need to join any new student societies’
Why is uncontrolled use of antibiotics a dangerous thing? What can we do about it?
Antibiotics are used to treat a wide range of infections, ranging from life threatening conditions to common respiratory tract infections
They are our only defence against many of these illnesses, but can become ineffective as bacteria have the ability to develop mutations that protect themselves from the drugs
The more antibiotics are used, the more likely it is that bacteria will develop protection against them. It is therefore important to use them sparingly so that we have effective antibiotics to combat life threatening conditions for as long as possible
Continued medical research is an essential tool that could create new drugs that bacteria are not resistant to
Changes to clinical practice, encouraging doctors not to prescribe antibiotics to those who do not necessarily require them, could help
Public health campaigns could highlight these issues, encouraging patients not to request antibiotics when they have the common cold, for example
Common Mistakes:
Saying that we need to stop giving away antibiotics to every patient who requests them because patients need to understand that it is the doctor’s decision whether to provide these drugs
Belittling patients who want antibiotics or doctors who prescribe them too quicky. For example, saying that prescribing antibiotics are an easy way of keeping a patient happy
What role do public health campaigns like anti-smoking TV adverts have in the NHS, and why is this a good way to spend NHS resources?
Pay close attention to health campaigns. These are used a lot and are seen as a significant weapon against disease and a way of safeguarding the NHS
Although healthcare professionals are well equipped to deal with a huge range of medical conditions, they are overstretched and under-funded. Prevention of disease is a major way that this burden can be, to a degree, alleviated
Through education, it is possible to make people aware what causes certain diseases, and therefore to encourage them to cut down on such practices. This can both improve the quality of their lives and ensure NHS resources are well used on other patients
However, it is important to note that not all diseases are preventable through education. Cancer, for example. So this is not a catch all solution
Think also from a scientific and analytical perspective: how measurable are the results of these campaigns? Try to look up some statistics online
Whether this is good or bad is probably too black and white: it ultimately depends on effectiveness, which links to the cost/reward ratio on a campaign basis and requires constant monitoring
Common Mistakes:
Viewing this kind of campaign as unimportant when set against the serious business of saving lives through medical activity. Saying for instance, that people never really listen to TV adverts and it is a waste of money
Being closed minded and not seeing all sides of the debate. Instinctively believing that money needs to be spent on hiring more doctors, as they are the ones who actually treat the patients
Not recognising the power of prevention — an increasing trend, which you need to be aware of
Is mental health an area of concern for the NHS, and if so why?
Mental health conditions can be a terrible burden for somebody suffering from them, and it is the duty of the NHS to help them
Modern society is increasingly fraught and stressful for many people, and this can lead to a wide range of mental health problems
Mental health conditions can also lead to physical problems
Mental and physical health care are both equally important when considering the health of a whole person, and mental health should therefore be receiving a significant amount of NHS resources
Recently, this has been a focus for many of the political parties, and the Liberal Democrats focused on mental health as a flagship policy in the 2015 election
Common Mistakes:
Saying that the NHS is charged with treating serious conditions like trauma and cancer, and mental health should be dealt with by other services
Believing that depression is not that serious and that psychologists can sort out things like that
Should vaccinations of children against common infectious diseases be compulsory?
First, as with so many questions of this type, it is important to establish the basic facts before getting into detail
Despite medical progress, preventable disease continues to affect millions of people, and vaccines for many of these are readily available. Vaccinating children is one way of halting their spread
The consequences of a parent’s child becoming infected are not just borne by that child, or that parent, but also the local community, who are at risk as well
However, forcing vaccination on all school children might be seen as overly paternalistic and parents may see this as a loss of their freedom to choose how to care for their child
In terms of the four pillars, this comes down to a choice between autonomy and non-maleficience — it’s a difficult balancing act
Common Mistakes:
Taking up a partisan position based on personal opinion
Even if you have a very strong personal opinion, it is better to walk through the arguments on both sides
A recent study estimated that by 2050 more than half of the UK population could be obese. Is this a cause for concern and if so, why?
Start by recognising that the issue has been in the news and cite anything you may have read or heard to corroborate this. If you have seen the study, say who it was by to really impress the interviewers
Move on to the problem itself. Why might obesity cause concern? Well, obesity is associated with a wide range of health problems, including diabetes and osteoarthritis, among others
These lead to a low quality of life for the person affected. Furthermore, their consequent conditions can cost the NHS. This is already a huge drain of NHS resources, so it is worrying that the trend is going up
It is therefore the interest of the NHS, and the population as a whole, to try to combat the rise of obesity
In most cases obesity is preventable and manageable, and can be reduced with exercise and diet advice. So, there is hope that even though the study estimates a spike in obesity numbers, these can be brought down with hard work
Common Mistakes:
Failure to see all the angles. There are lots of stakeholders in this problem: the patient, the NHS and the population as a whole. Try to see the big picture
Believing that the NHS shouldn’t be involved in giving lifestyle advice; it should stick to treating illnesses
How much does a mountain weigh?
As with all questions of this sort, you won’t be able to get an exact answer. They are looking for you to talk through a systematic methodology. It is about applying reasoning and scientific rationale to an unusual scenario
You don’t have to answer straight away. Take a little time to map out a good starting point. Ask for a moment if you need. But you do have to start articulating your thought process at some point — probably before you know it is complete
You should ask logical questions, such as: what shape is the mountain? How tall is it? And what is the radius of the base?
Getting these parameters would allow you to use an appropriate mathematical formula, such as the one for the volume of a cone: one third pie r squared, multiplied by height
If they are not prepared to provide any further information, then you would need to work out how you would get some of these answers, like consulting existing maps
You can then ask about other important factors that will have a major impact, like the type of mountain it is and what type of rock it is made out of. Perhaps you would take a rock as a sample and extrapolate the weight
Common Mistakes:
Freezing. You have to articulate some sort of logical thought process.
Thinking for a moment and then coming out with a random number. Even if, by great chance, this was accurate, it defeats the purpose of the exercise
How different would the world be if the wheel wasn’t invented?
Again, this is about implementing a logical process in a difficult situation — and covering all the angles. You might begin by talking about uses of the wheel currently
Transport would be a good starting put, since a lot of types of transport depend on the wheel e.g. cars, bikes, aeroplanes, boats with wheel engines
Be creative, though. Wheels are used for transport but try to cover as many angles as possible to show you can think outside the box
What about water wheels in electricity production? In machinery, the wheel evolved into gears and propellers. So without the wheel all these areas would be affected
You might want to speculate on whether humans would have created alternatives or whether the advancements made possible by the wheel would simply not have been made
Then move ahead to the next logical step. What are the implications of this? Would it have affected the evolution of society? (The world would definitely be a smaller place)
Remember, the wheel has also affected lots of other major things, like war and trade. You should try to cover as many bases as possible. You might spark some lively debate, which could even end up being quite fun
Common Mistakes:
Not considering all the various implications, causes and effects. It’s obvious to say that there would be no cars, but you need to show that you think out of the box.
How many words are there in an average book?
You need to get as much detail as you can before launching headlong down what could be a logical rabbit hole
First, establish what type of book it is. You can ask but they might not say. In which case just state that you’re assuming it is, say, a novel, because this makes life easier (if it were a textbook for example, there would be diagrams and tables; this differs a lot from book to book)
Think logically. Start with the average number of pages in a novel. This doesn’t have to be right, just reasonable. Always use round numbers, so you can multiply them out without causing a huge headache. In this case let’s say 300 pages.
Then, estimate how many words are on each page. Again, break this down. Possibly twenty lines, each with ten words. So 200 words
300 multiplied by 200 equals 60,000 words
However, to really show you are thinking of all angles, estimate how many pages would be wordless (or have less words e.g. dedication and review pages). Say this is equivalent to ten wordless pages.
10 multiplied by 200 equals 2,000 words. Subtracting this from 60,000, means that your average book is 58,000 words long
Common Mistakes:
Coming out with a random number. This question is evaluating your thought process. It might be that your mother is an author and you know the answer, but they want to see you talk a problem through, so try to respect that
Using difficult numbers. Saying that each page has 184 words and there are 317 pages will leave you with some difficult sums to do
To what extent do you think fear is beneficial?
This is an example of a more abstract, and less process-driven, creative interview question, and as such it requires a slightly different process
You should take a moment to think up a balanced argument, which reflects both sides of the situation. You can’t be black and white about such a complex and subjective issue
Arguments for: inhibition, in the sense of keeping yourself out of dangerous situations, is an evolutionary instinct to promote self-preservation. It modulates your relationships with other people and it gives you a social conscience
Arguments against: fear can limit your human experience. It is not always necessary, and it can be dictated by your past encounters with certain stimulus. Past a certain point it can be detrimental to your heath
You could then link the question to the medical environment¦
Disease puts patients in vulnerable situations in which there is an element of fear and this can be harmful when it comes to good decision making. You should make it clear that you understand that fear will have an impact on your interactions with patients
There will be moments in your career where you may be unsure of your decisions and fear the possible outcomes/consequences. This is natural, and you should show an awareness of this
You could also state that this will lessen as you gain more experience and confidence, and that even when you are ‘worried’ you would be confident that you acted within guidelines, consulted your colleagues and made a reasonable decision
Common Mistakes
Giving a one-sided answer. Questions like this merit more than a simple binary answer of ‘yes’ or ‘no’, ‘good’ or ‘bad’. You have to recognise, and show that you can appreciate, the shades of grey and complexity involved