Media Sociologists Flashcards
Dutton - mass media characteristics
Mass media has been differentiated from other types of communication in terms of four essential characteristics: Distance, Technology, Scale, Commodity.
Distance - traditional mass media is impersonal, lacks immediacy and is one-way. No matter how emotionally involved a person is, they have no way of directly affecting what is happening on screen.
Technology - mass media requires a vehicle such as a television, or a mobile phone.
Scale - mass media involves simultaneous communication with many people, e.g. live television.
Commodity - mass media comes at a price, e.g. to watch Netflix you must pay a subscription fee.
Crosbie - new media
Crosbie argues that the new media has characteristics that make them very different to other forms of mass media.
Technology - They cannot exist without the appropriate (computer).
Personalisation - Individualised messages can be simultaneously delivered to vast numbers of people.
Collective control - Each person in a network potentially has the ability to share, shape and change the content of information being exchanged.
McQuail - impartial news
McQuail (1992) argues that ‘news’ is not objective or impartial. News is a socially manufactured product because it is the end result of a selective process.
Galtung and Ruge - 9 news values
Galtung and Ruge (1965) identified 9 key news values. Some of the most memorable include: Extraordinariness, Reference to Elites, and Negativity.
Davies - churnalism
Pluralist Davies (2008) argues that modern day British journalism is characterised by ‘Churnalism’, which is the uncritical, overreliance by journalists on ‘facts’ churned out by public relations experts and government spin doctors. He found that 80% of news stories in a two-week period in 1997 were sourced this way and that only 12% of stories were generated by journalists.
Bagdikian - wider power elite
Bagdikian (2004) suggests that almost all media owners in the USA are part of a wider power elite made up of industrial, financial and political establishment. He claims that this makes the news politically conservative and promotes corporate values. This explains why newspapers usually have sections dedicated to financial news rather than the growing gap between the rich and poor.
Herman and Chomsky - media propaganda
Herman and Chomsky (1988) argue that the media participate in propaganda campaigns helpful to elite interests. They suggest that media performance is largely shaped by market forces. The media promotes elitist values as powerful institutions such as the government can threaten and pressure the media, thus controlling the flow of information.
Edwards and Cromwell - the West in media
Edwards and Cromwell (2006) argue that particular subjects e.g. US and UK responsibility for genocide, corporate criminality, and threats to the existence of life are ignored by the British mass media. For example, the USA is almost always presented as the champion of democracy.
Hall - hierarchy of credibility
Hall agrees that news is supportive of capitalist interests because those in powerful positions have better access to media institutions. Hall argues that this is a result of the news values employed by most journalists. In particular, the views of politicians, business leaders and police officers (primary definers) are believed to be more important than those of pressure groups, trade unionists and ordinary citizens. Hall refers to this as the hierarchy of credibility.
Schlesinger - power of the elites
Schlesinger (1990) is critical of theories that focus on the power of the elites and media owners because the media does not necessarily act in the best interest of these people. For example, politicians are very careful of what they say in the media as they understand that it can be misconstrued. They are aware that the media can strongly influence voting behaviour.
GUMG - language used by the media
The Glasgow University Media Group (GUMG) found that language used by the media are more sympathetic to the interests of the powerful and often devalued points of view of less powerful people. For example, the media reported strikers as making ‘demands’ whereas those in powerful positions were reported as ‘negotiating’.
Stein - internet as a secondary source
Stein (2002) urges caution in the use of the Internet as a source of secondary data because its content has not been academically or scientifically verified. Stein also argues that access to computers and the Internet, both within the Western societies in terms of social class and worldwide, is still deeply unequal. This is referred to as the ‘digital divide’.
Bagdikian - media ownership
Bagdikian (2004) notes that in 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the USA, but by 2004 media ownership was concentrated in 7 corporations.
Curran - press barons
Curran (2003) notes that ownership of British newspapers has always been concentrated in the hands of a few ‘press barons’, e.g. in 1937, four men owned nearly one in every two national and local daily newspapers sold in Britain.
detailed systematic examination of the social history of the British press does suggest that the evidence for owner interference in and manipulation of British newspaper content is strong.
notes that in the period 1920-50 press barons openly boasted that they ran their newspapers for the express purpose of propaganda that reflected their political views.
points out that even when engaged in investigative reporting, the majority of newspapers in Britain have supported the Conservative Party.
also notes that the period 1974-92 saw the emergence of Rupert Murdoch, however, Curran rejects the idea that Murdoch is part of a unified capitalist elite but acknowledges that Murdoch’s newspapers are conservative in content and strongly supportive of capitalist interests. He argues Murdoch’s motives are economic rather than ideological in that Murdoch believes that right wing economic policies are the key to vast profits.
Doyle - examination of media ownership
Doyle (2002) suggests that examination of ownership and control patterns is important for two reasons.
1) All points of view need to be heard if society is to be truly democratic.
2) Abuses of power and influence by elites need to be monitored by a free media.
Doyle argues that too much concentration of media ownership is dangerous and unhealthy because the media have the power to exert considerable influence over public opinion.
Miliband - role of the media
Miliband (1973) argued that the role of the media is to shape how we think about the world we live in and suggested that audiences are rarely informed about important issues such as inequalities in wealth or why poverty exists.
Five ways of ideological manipulation
Tunstall and Palmer - government control of media owners
Tunstall and Palmer (1991) suggest that governments are no longer interested in controlling the activities of media owners because they need their support to either gain power or hang onto it.
Curran - media owner intervention
Curran’s analysis of British newspapers suggests that both pluralist and Marxist theories may be mistaken in the way they look at media ownership. He argues the pluralist view that media owners do not intervene in media content is evidentially false.
argues that since 2000 there has been even greater intervention by owners such as Murdoch. However, Curran disagrees with Marxists about the motive for this. He notes that the actions of media owners are not collectivised, rather they pursue their economic goals in a ruthlessly individualised way in an attempt to obtain a bigger share of the market than their capitalist competitors.
GUMG - role of journalists
The GUMG suggest that media content does support the interests of those who run the capitalist system. However, this is an unintended by-product of the social backgrounds of journalists and broadcasters rather than a conscious capitalist conspiracy.
The GUMG points out that most journalists working for national newspapers, television and radio tend to be overwhelmingly male, White, and middle class, e.g. 54% are privately educated.
The GUMG claims that these journalists and broadcasters tend to believe in middle-of-the-road (consensus) views and ideas because these are generally unthreatening. Journalists believe that these appeal to the majority of their viewers, listeners and readers.
Ideas outside this consensus are viewed by journalists as ‘extremist’. People who hold these opinions are rarely invited to contribute their views in newspapers or on television, or if they are, they are ridiculed by journalists.
The GUMG argues that these journalists are not motivated by a desire to defend capitalist interests. Media companies are profit-making businesses.
Those who commission and plan programmes, or decide newspaper or magazine content, usually play safe by excluding anything that might offend or upset readers or viewers. Losing several thousand readers, or viewers, because they were offended by ‘extreme’ views and potentially losing millions of pounds in revenue and profit is too much of a risk.
Barnett and Weymour - media being dumbed down
Barnett and Weymour argue that such decisions have had a negative cultural effect in the sense that education, information and news have been increasingly side lined.
They compared television schedules in 1978, 1988 and 1998 and argued that the evidence suggests that television in Britain has been significantly dumbed down, e.g. the number of one-off dramas and documentaries has halved, while soap operas and cheap reality shows have increased fivefold.
Barnett and Weymour note that even the BBC is succumbing to these commercial pressures. Furthermore, they conclude that despite having hundreds of television channels, we do not have more choice, just more of the same thing.
Adorno and Horkheimer - media should encourage critical thinking
Adorno and Horkheimer (1940) think that mainstream, mass culture is mostly produced in an entirely rational way, so creative decisions are also commercial decisions.
think that real culture should challenge us, stimulate critical thought and encourage our individuality. The culture which they think is valuable helps to cultivate a critical disposition in people.
Curran - manipulation of media content
Curran (2003) found lots of evidence of owners directly manipulating media content.
argues that in the later 20th century and today, owners are, if anything, even more interventionist, with again Rupert Murdoch being the obvious example.
Galbraith - technocratic managerial elite
Galbraith (1967) found a ‘technocratic managerial elite’ - despite being well paid and regarded, they remain employees rather than the employers. Those employers are called ‘media conglomerates’.
Bernard and McDermott - media ownership rules
‘current media ownership rules in the UK prevent any one entity acquiring excessive influence in the sector, thereby ensuring plurality of voice and diversity of content’.
Davis and McAdam - new economic shift
David and McAdam (2000) suggest that globalisation has given a new meaning to diversity and competition through what they call a ‘new economic shift’.
Murdock and Golding - separation of interests
Murdock and Golding (1977) argue the separation of interests between owners and controllers is more apparent since managers are increasingly also owners of the companies they control - and they think and act in much the same way as the individual media owners of the past.
Collins - competition does not guarantee diversity
Collins (2002) argues competition does not automatically guarantee media pluralism and diversity.
Economies of scale, for example, mean that the majority of consumer demands can be satisfied by very few giant corporations (Amazon, Google, Apple, Facebook…) that wield huge amounts of economic, political and ideological power - regardless of whether their ownership is concentrated in the hands of a single individual or a wide diversity of anonymous shareholders.
Allen and Densmore - 10 aspects of the media
Allen and Densmore (1977) identified 10 key aspects of the media.
1 - Media: The Source of Power and Key to Women’s Progress
2 - In History, Women Made Progress When They Had A Means of Communication
3 - Individual Communication and the Technological & Economic Structure of Mass Media
4 - Women’s Criticism of Mass Media as A National Communications System
5 - The Disseminators of Information as A Causal Factor in History
6 - Efforts to Expand Communication.
7 - Mass Media Response to the Demand for Expanded Media to Convey More Information
8 - Philosophical Basis for a New Communication System.
9 - Finding the Way.
10 - Women’s Role in the Restructuring Process.
Greer - women’s bodies as aesthetic objects
In ‘The Female Eunuch’, Greer claimed that treating women’s bodies as aesthetic objects without function deforms them.
Hill Collins - media experiences of Black women
Hill Collins (2000) found that media experiences of Black women in Britain have changed over the decades but among what has remained consistent are struggles against their limited and derogatory depiction in ‘controlling images
Sobande - new media opportunities for Black women
Since the days of events and collective work in the 1980s led by Black women in Britain concerning their media experiences and material conditions, increased availability and accessibility of digital devices and content-creation processes has resulted in new opportunities for Black women to relatively autonomously produce media, depict themselves, and generate discourse that counters dominant narratives.
Tong - domestic sphere of the family
Tong (1989) notes that Marxist feminists identify how work shapes consciousness, and women’s work shapes her status and self-image. Therefore, Marxist feminists are primarily concerned with the division of labour that keeps women in the domestic sphere of the family and men in the workplace. One tool to shape womens consciousness and work place is the media for example in kids cartoons do we see many business women? Or stay at home moms?
Strinati - media concerned with surface style and imagery
Strinati suggests that postmodern TV and film become preoccupied with basic surface style and imagery, rather than deeper underlying themes, which might relate to ‘realities’ of the human condition. For example, action movies are more focused on special effects rather than human experiences.
Kaplan - pop and rock videos
Kaplan (1987) identified pop and rock videos as perfect examples of postmodernist culture because they abandon all notion of a narrative structure - there is no attempt to ‘tell a story’, rather the power of the video lies purely in the collage of images mixed with music.
Lyotard - cynicism about metanarratives
Lyotard suggested that the postmodern world is characterised by a spreading cynicism about ‘metanarratives’ or general belief systems, including world religions, political ideologies such as socialism or liberalism, and even science and reason. We have become disillusioned and no longer expect the world to become a better place.
Baudrillard - decline of absolute truth
Baudrillard found that postmodern sociologies contain the observation that in postmodernity, as opposed to modernity, we witness the decline of absolute truth and the rise of relativism. He views consumption not only as merely economic and material activity but symbolic and meaningful.
Eco - hyperreal
Eco (1987) defines the hyperreal as that which is more real than real. For example, Coca Cola on the surface level is just a drink, but it represents other things such as the celebration of Christmas.
Jameson and Baudrillard - importance of media
Jameson and Baudrillard found that the decline of engineering and manufacturing in many advanced capitalist economies, the provision of the cultural and media services has become a key sector in the economy. For example, the record industry is one of the leading export sectors of the economy.
Harvey - images dominate narrative
Harvey found that popular culture is seen to express these confusions and distortions. As such, it is less likely to reflect coherent senses of space or time. Some idea of this argument can be obtained by trying to identify the locations used in some pop videos, the linear narratives of some recent films or the times and spaces crossed in a typical evening of TV viewing…In short, post modern culture is a culture sans frontieres, outside history.
Lechte - hyperreality not so all-embracing
Lechte makes the point that hyperreality might not be so all embracing. He suggests that the judgemental standards of a modern period - based on science and reason are still significantly in place.
Kellner - importance of social relationships
Kellner suggests that that there is an overemphasis on the importance of TV technology in determining the way that society develops and ignores the importance of social relationships.
Lechner and Boli - globalisation?
Lechner and Boli (2005) found that there are sociologists who question whether globalisation is really happening at all. and those who question the extent to which it is inevitable and irreversible.
Strinati - media as a global industry
Strinati (1995) argues that the media today is a global industry, and it promotes (through advertising and the promotion of brands and logos) other global industries.