Media and comms science (Soalla)09.09.24 Flashcards
Define Medium (or a media)
“…a tool, a technique, an intermediary - that enables people to express themselves and to
communicate to others…” (Balle, 2020)
Define Communication
a connection between two communicating parties (communicators)
Define Mass Communication
“The organized means of communicating openly, at a distance, and to many in a short space of time” (McQuail , 2005)
Define Mass media
Media with “capacity to reach the entire population rapidly and with much the same information, opinions
and entertainment” (McQuail , 2005)
Define Communication Sciences (Studies)
multi- and interdisciplinary sciences that study communications and media
processes and effects in society
Define Journalism Studies
very young, derived from Communication Sciences and focused on journalism activities and their
impacts in social life
The sign
“the smallest component of every act of communication”.
Semiology: European origin
Linguistic dimension of the sign
Sign = Signifier (physical appearance) + signified (mental concept) + Referent (object itself, the actual smth)
–> Ferdinand de Saussure (1857–1913) was a Swiss linguist and one of the founding figures of modern linguistics and semiology (the study of signs). In terms of semiology, Saussure is best known for his theory of the linguistic sign, which laid the groundwork for understanding how meaning is constructed through language.
Here are some key points about Saussure’s contribution to semiology:
–> Sign, Signifier, and Signified: Saussure introduced the concept of the linguistic sign, which consists of two parts:
–> Signifier: The form of the sign (e.g., a word, sound, or image).
–> Signified: The concept or meaning associated with the signifier. Saussure emphasized that the relationship between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary; there is no inherent connection between the sound of a word and its meaning.
Semiotic: American origin
Philosophical and psychological perspective
The American origin of semiotics is largely attributed to Charles Sanders Peirce
–> Peirce’s semiotic theory differs from Ferdinand de Saussure’s approach by being more complex and comprehensive, encompassing not just linguistic signs but all forms of communication and representation
Sign = Representamen (material form of sign) + interpretant (meaning of the sign) + object
–> His theory is based on the idea that a sign is anything that communicates meaning, and it consists of three interconnected components:
1) Representamen (Material Form of the Sign): This is the form that the sign takes; it is the tangible or perceivable part of the sign, such as a word, image, sound, or gesture. It’s the equivalent of Saussure’s “signifier.”
2) Interpretant – the CONCEPT that arises in the mind of the interpreter as a result of the sign. It’s the effect or the sense that the sign generates in the interpreter’s mind. Unlike Saussure’s “signified,” the interpretant is DYNAMIC and CAN EVOLVE based on context and interpretation.
3) Object: It is the actual thing or concept that the representamen stands for. Peirce further subdivides objects into:
– Immediate Object: The object as represented within the sign itself.
– Dynamical Object: The actual object in the external world to which the sign refers.
!!! The process of semiosis (signification) involves the interaction of these three elements, creating a continuous loop of interpretation
Denotation (Обозначение)
the first degree of the intelligible → related the signifier
Connotation
Meanings that require practical knowledge or cultural knowledge to be understood → related to conception of the
signified
The Communication process
Sender, Encoder, Channel, Noise, Decoder, Receiver, Feedback
Different forms of communication
Intrapersonal communication, Interpersonal communication, Mass communication, Non-verbal
communication
McLuhan about communication process, and McQuail about 5 main elements in the society
McQuail: 4 main elements in the wider life of society:
These are:
1) certain communicative purposes, needs, or uses;
2)technologies for communicating publicly to many at a distance;
3) forms of social organization that provide the skills and frameworks for organizing production and distribution;
4) forms of regulation and control.
The relationship between communication technologies and societal needs is not fixed and varies with time and context. Some technologies meet pre-existing needs, like printing replacing hand-copying, while others, like film or radio, emerge before a clear demand exists. The adoption of these technologies depends on material factors and the social and cultural environment. A key condition for the development of media, especially print, has been a degree of freedom in thought, expression, and action, though this freedom was not necessary for the initial invention. For instance, printing techniques existed in China and Korea long before Gutenberg’s European invention.
–> There is no reason why
mass media need follow only one path in the future, always converging on the western model.
McLuhan: communication processes and new technological developments go hand in hand with social developments, and vice versa.
McLuhan (1962) : the invention of printing → The Gutenberg Galaxy → The printed press contributed to social trends such as individualisation, secularisation, democratisation, capitalism and nationalism.
❑ History of mass media:
▪ Newspaper = circulation peak (in Europe) in the mid-1980s (after The Thirty Glorious Years)
▪ Radio = the first medium capable of reaching the masses without the need to know how to read and write; peak in terms of social impact before and during the Second World War
▪ Television = the channel of preference for ‘commercials’ advertising in the consumer society ; still considered the main source of news and information for most people and the main channel of communication between politicians and citizens
The Dominant paradigm
The dominant paradigm views society as a “good society” that is democratic, liberal, pluralistic, consensual, orderly, and well-informed. From this perspective, social inequality is not seen as problematic if conflicts are resolved through existing institutions.
The theoretical elements of the dominant paradigm were not invented for the case of the mass
media but were largely taken over from sociology, psychology and an applied version of
information science/transmission:
1) Functionalist framework for analyzing media. Lasswell (1948) identified the key functions of communication in society as essential tasks that maintain social integration, continuity, and order.
2) Behaviorism, with its focus on stimulus-response theory, provided a way to study the influence and effectiveness of mass media in changing attitudes and persuasion. This approach aligned well with the needs of the transmission model of communication.
Early communication research was shaped by the belief that the liberal, pluralist society was threatened by totalitarianism (e.g., communism), where media were used to suppress democracy. This awareness reinforced the values of the “western way of life,” with media seen as key supporters of these values.