Measuring outcomes of Brand equity Flashcards

1
Q

distinction between brand value (valuation) and brand equity

A

Brand equity: more consumer-based perspective.
Brand value: more of a company-based perspective.

–> Brand equity is therefore a concept a lot broader than brand value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are some questions to ask when evaluating brands?

A
  1. What is being valued, the trademarks, the brand or the branded business?
  2. What is the purpose for such valuation?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the three kinds of comparative methods for brand valuation

A
  • Brand-Based Comparative Approaches
  • Marketing-Based Comparative Approaches
  • Conjoint Analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

brand-based comparative methods: description

A
  • Competitive brands used as benchmarks by consumers
    – Exemplar: Category leader or some other brand that consumers feel is representative of the category, like their most preferred brand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

brand-based comparative methods: applications

A

– Classic example is blind testing research
* Consumers examine or use a product with or without brand identification
* Differences typically emerge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

brand-based comparative methods: critique

A

Learning is limited by the number of different applications examined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

marketing-based comparative methods: description

A

Hold the brand fixed
– Examine consumer response based on changes in the marketing program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Marketing-Based Comparative methods: applications

A

– Long academic and industry tradition of exploring price premiums using marketing-based comparative approaches
* Variations to derive similar types of demand curves
– Many firms now try to assess price sensitivity and willingness-to- pay thresholds for different brands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Marketing-Based Comparative methods: critique

A

May be difficult to discern whether consumer responses to changes in the marketing stimuli are being caused by brand knowledge or by more generic product knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

conjoint analysis: description

A

Survey-based multivariate technique that enables marketers to profile the consumer decision process with respect to products and brands
– Part worth: The value consumers attach to each attribute level, as statistically derived by the conjoint formula

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

conjoint analysis: applications

A

– Allows study of different brands and different aspects of the product or marketing program simultaneously
* Product composition, price, distribution outlets, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

conjoint analysis: critique

A

Marketing profiles may violate consumers’ expectations based on what they already know about brands
–> this might increase consumer expectations (have them wondering why not both things?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are some holistic methods of brand evaluation

A
  • Residual Approach
  • Valuation Approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

residual approach

A

– Examines the value of the brand by subtracting consumers’ preferences for the brand from their overall brand preferences
* Based on physical product attributes alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

valuation approach

A

– Places a financial value on brand equity
* Accounting purposes, mergers and acquisitions, or other such reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are some residual approaches

A
  • Scanner Panel
  • Choice Experiments
  • Multi-Attribute Attitude Models
17
Q

what are some valuation approaches

A
  • Accounting Background
  • Historical Perspectives
  • General Approaches
18
Q

describe academic approaches for brand valuation

A

Seminal academic research study proposed estimating a firm’s brand equity derived from financial market estimates of brand- related profits

19
Q

what are three other well-establish brand valuation approaches

A

– Interbrand
– Brand Z
– Brand finance

20
Q

Interbrand

A
  • Leading brand valuation firm
  • How a brand benefits an organization
    – Internally and externally
21
Q

three key components of Interbrand

A
  1. Financial forecast
  2. Role of brand
    a. In some businesses, e.g. fragrances or packaged goods, the Role of Branding is very high - as the brand is the predominant driver of the customer purchase decision.
    b. In b2b, the brand is only one purchase driver among many and the Role of Branding is therefore lower.
  3. Strength analysis
    a. $100 from the RBC brand in 5 years commands a lower discount rate than $100 from the National Bank of Canada brand in 5 years, as the RBC brand is stronger and therefore more likely to deliver the expected earnings.
22
Q

concerns with interbrand system

A
  • Interbrand system does not consider the potential of the brand to support extensions into other product classes.
  • Brand support may be ineffective; spending money on advertising does not necessarily indicate effective brand building.
  • Trademark protection, although necessary, does not of itself create brand value.
23
Q

BrandZ

A
  • Based on the Meaningfully Different Framework
    – Suggests brands create value if they offer three key benefits (power, premium, potential):
  • They are meaningful
  • They are different
  • They are salient
24
Q

Key steps in the BrandZ valuation

A

– Calculating financial value
– Calculating brand contribution
– Calculating brand value

25
Q

Brand Finance

A
  • Based on the “relief from royalty” approach
    – Brand’s value is based on the royalties that a company would have paid for licensing that brand from a third party
  • Assuming it was not the brand owner
26
Q

4 Things to think about when comparing the major brand valuation approaches

A
  1. All three approaches are based on some variation of the income-based approach to brand valuation
    – All are based on projections of income
  2. All three methods compute the present value of projected future earnings
    – Based on an estimate of brand strength, and
    –An application of a discount rate
  3. All three approaches use available financial and market data
    – And compute the economic value added
  4. Types of data used to measure brand perceptions vary across the three approaches