MCQ - 1-50 Flashcards
- Jed is charged with 9 counts of buggery involving 3 complainants, X, Y, and Z, all of whom ar 8-year-old boys who are students of Jed. X alleges that Jed visited him at night and brought him to a bathroom in the school. X says that he was buggered in the bathroom twice. Y says that Jed visited him three times and each time took him to the bathroom and buggered him. The third complainant, Z, says he was taken to a nearby forest during a school trip and buggered there. He further says that the same offences occurred when he was taken to a deserted beach on four different occasions during nature walks. Counsel for the defence applies for a ruling that the counts relating to all three complainants should not be included on the one indictment. Which of the following is correct?
A. The trial Judge must accede to the application as it is not possible to include counts on an indictment which relate to separate incidents and separate complainants as this would be grossly prejudicial.
B. The trial Judge may accede to the application as regards counts involving Z but refuse separate trials of X and Y due to the particular features common to each of the offences against X and Y.
C. The trial Judge must refuse the application because the prosecution is entitled to join any number of charges on the same indictment, even if they arise out of separate incidents, providing the number of counts on the indictment is not so great as to constitute prejudice in itself.
D. The trial Judge must refuse the application because the account of each complainant can clearly corroborate that of the others and the rules of procedure ought not to offend against common sense.
Answer B. The trial Judge may accede to the application as regards counts invos
Answer B
- Sending forward to the Circuit Criminal Court, Central Criminal Court or Special Criminal Court is governed by:
A. The Criminal Law Act 1997
B. The Criminal Justice Act 1967 as amended by The Criminal Procedure Act 1999.
C. The Criminal Justice Act 1984
D. The Criminal Justice Act 1951
Answer B. The Criminal Justice Act 1967 as amended by The Criminal Procedure
- A sentencing judge may NOT:
A. Back-date a sentence of imprisonment
B. Postpone a sentence of imprisonment
C. Adjourn sentencing and consider imposing a suspended sentence on the adjourned date
D. Impose a sentence with a review date and consider suspending the balance of the sentence on the review date.
Answer D. Impose a sentence with a review date and consider suspending the bal
- Which of the following statements is correct in relation to “consultative” case stated under section 52 of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961?
A. The District Court Judge, when asked to state a case during proceedings, will only accede where it is shown that it concerns a question of law of exceptional public importance.
B. The District court judge has total discretion with respect to whether or not to accede to an application to state a case to the High Court.
C. It is necessary to get the consent of the prosecution before an application to state a case can be made to the District Court Judge.
D. The District Court Judge when asked to state a case during the proceedings must state the case unless he is of the view that the application is frivolous.
Answer D. The District Court Judge when asked to state a case during the procee
- In which scenario can an arrest be made by a person other than the Gardaí?
[A] Where an arrestable offence is being committed or there is reasonable cause to suspect it is being committed.
[B] Where an arrestable offence has been committed.
[C] Where there is a reasonable belief that someone will commit a breach of the peace in the immediate future.
[D] Where there is reasonable cause to suspect that an arrestable offence has been committed.
Answer [D] Where there is reasonable cause to suspect that an arrestable
- Which of the following is invariably INCORRECT?
(i) Evidence of a previous, out of court, identification is not admissible if a dock identification is possible.
(ii) Evidence of a previous out of court identification is admissible as an exception to the rule against hearsay.
(iii) Evidence of a previous out of court identification is admissible as an exception to the rule against narrative.
A. (i) only.
B. (ii) only
C. (iii) only
D. None of the statements is invariable incorrect
Answer A. (i) only.
A person against whom the facts charged have been proven will not receive a recorded conviction if the sentencing judge:
A. Makes an order under Section 1(2) of the Probation of Offenders Act 1907.
B. Makes an order under Section 1(1)(i) of the Probation of Offenders Act 1907.
C. Imposes a fine only
D. Makes a Community Service order
Answer. Makes an order under Section 1(1)(i) of the Probation of Offende
- In a case involving a rape or other sexual offence, evidence of a complaint will NOT be admitted if it is:
A. A statement made soon after the alleged offence
B. A statement made to a number of witnesses
C. Not voluntary
D. A statement elicited by questioning
Answer C. Not voluntary
- In which of the following circumstances is it possible to sentence a 16-year-old boy to a sentence of imprisonment?
A. Where the Court certified that the young person is of so unruly a character that he cannot be detained in a place of detention.
B. Where there is no room in any available place of detention and the term of the sentence does not exceed a period of 3 months.
C. Where he has been convicted of murder contrary to common law.
D. None of the above, as a child under the age of 17 may not be sentenced to imprisonment under any circumstances.
Answer A. Where the Court certified that the young person is of so unru
- Paul is charged with the arson of Michaels caravan which was parked at the side of a road in Ringsend. In drafting the indictment, counsel for the prosecution must:
A. Refer to a caravan, state that it was not Paul’s property and identify the road so as to describe the property in question and the location of the offence with sufficient particularity.
B. Refer to the caravan by registration number, make and model, state the full name of the owner and give the name of the road in question and the name of the area i.e. Ringsend in Dublin.
C. Refer to the general address and attach a photograph of the caravan.
D. Refer to the caravan only, stating its owner and approximate value, the address is immaterial given that the caravan was not there permanently.
Answer A. Refer to a caravan, state that it was not Paul’s property and
- Barry was apprehended in a house that contained large quantities of drugs. He is being tried in the Circuit Court for offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977. During the course of the cross-examination of a Garda witness by Counsel for the accused, it is put to the Garda that the accused had made none of the statements tendered in evidence, that he hadn’t pointed out the place where the drugs were hidden, and that the Garda was trying to convict the accused by inventing false verbal statements and other incriminating evidence.
Counsel for the State has applied for leave to cross-examine the accused as to his previous convictions. What course of action should be followed by the Trial Judge?
A. Permit the cross-examination (while the jury are present) because the conduct of the accused’s case has involved the casting of imputations on the character of a prosecution witness.
B. Disallow the cross-examination of the accused on his previous convictions because a procedure which inhibits an accused from challenging the veracity of the evidence against him at the risk of having his previous character put in evidence would be a breach of fair procedures.
C. Disallow the cross-examination because the cross-examination of the accused in relation to his previous convictions is something which the court can never allow.
D. Permit the cross-examination of the accused on his previous convictions because the conduct of the accused’s case has involved the casting of imputations on the character of a prosecution witness, but direct that such cross-examination should take place in the absence of the jury.
Answer B. Disallow the cross-examination of the accused on his previous
- A group of you are having a discussion about the two types of case stated that can be sought in the District Court. It is accepted among you that the appeal by way of case stated is sought at the end of the District Court proceedings whereas a consultative case stated is applied for during the proceedings. In the discussion, the following assertions are made however only one of them is correct. Which one?
A. In an appeal by way of case stated, the High Court can reverse, affirm, or amend the determination of the District Court on the basis of the law determined or it can remit the case back to the court. However, the High Court has no power to amend or reduce a penalty imposed by the District Court on the hearing of the case stated.
B. In an appeal by way of case stated, the High Court can reverse or affirm or amend the determination of the District Court on the basis of the law determined or remit the case back to the Court. The High Court also has a discretion to amend or reduce a penalty imposed by the District Court on the hearing of the case stated.
C. The decision of the High Court in an appeal by way of case stated can be appealed to the Supreme Court where there is a point of exceptional public importance.
D. There is no statutory right to appeal the determination of the High Court on consultative case stated to the Supreme Court.
Answer A. In an appeal by way of case stated, the High Court can reverse
- Where a prisoner has been detained under section 20 of the Offences Against the State Act 1939 (as amended by Offences Against the State Amendment Act 1998) the total amount of time that he can be detained without charge (including any extension of detention period directed by the Chief Superintendent) without being produced in court shall not exceed:
A. 24 Hours
B. 48 Hours
C. 72 Hours
D. 102 Hours
Answer B. 48 Hours
- Felicity is 15 years old. She is the only witness to the commission of a crime and is terrified that the accused will intimidate her in Court to the extent that she may be unable to give evidence. You act for the prosecution. In order to assist her, you make an application to the Court that her evidence be given by live video link in accordance with provisions of Sections 12-19 of the Criminal (Evidence) Act 1992 as amended. Your application will be unsuccessful if the offence charged is:
A. S3 Assault causing harm
B. Larceny
C. Rape
D. Robbery
Answer B. Larceny
- At Gail’s trial for robbery, Emer purports to identify Gail as the robber and claims to know her well from choir practice in their local church. It is put to Emer that she has never attended at choir practice and Emer denies this. It is also put to Emer that she had poor vision at the time of the alleged robbery, due to cataracts which have since been removed. She denies this also. The Defence apply to call evidence from Gordon, the choirmaster, in order to prove that Emer is not in the choir and from the eye surgeon who treated Emer. The trial Judge must:
A. Refuse both applications as they relate to collateral matters and the defence must accept the answers given.
B. Accede to both applications because the first is relevant to the issue of identification and the second is evidence of a physical disability affecting reliability.
C. Refuse the first application and accede to the second because the first is a collateral matter and the defence must accept the answers given whereas the second is evidence of a physical disability affecting reliability.
D. Accede to the first because it is relevant to the issue of identification but refuse the second because it is a collateral matter, and the defence must accept the answers given.
Answer B. Accede to both applications because the first is relevant to t
- According to S6(1) Criminal Law Act 1997 the Gardaí may enter a premises on foot of an arrest warrant if
[A] They have reasonable cause to believe evidence is on the premises
[B] They have reasonable cause to believe evidence is being destroyed
[C] They have reasonable cause to believe the wanted person is on the premises
[D] They have reasonable cause to believe there is a crime in progress
Answer [C] They have reasonable cause to believe the wanted person is on
- What is the maximum sentence of imprisonment that a District Court Judge can impose for one offence ( unless the statute creating the offence specifies a lower maximum)?
A. Two years
B. One Year
C. Six Months
D. Three Months
Answer B. One Year
- A hostile witness is:
A. An unfavourable witness.
B. An unpleasant witness
C. A witness who shows no desire to tell the truth at the instance of the party calling him.
D. A witness who shows no desire to answer the questions of the party cross examining him.
Answer C. A witness who shows no desire to tell the truth at the instanc
- Unless legislation provides to the contrary in relation to a specific offence, a complaint alleging a summary offence must be laid within what period form the date of commission of the offence?
A. 12 months
B. 6 months.
C. 3 months
D. 6 weeks
Answer B. 6 months.
- Xavier, a foreign national, pleads guilty to theft in the District Court. Which of the following orders or sentences can the Judge NOT make or impose under any circumstances?
A. A fine
B. A deportation order
C. A suspended sentence of imprisonment on condition that Xavier keeps the peace and is of good behaviour and also on condition that he leaves the State and does not return for a specified period.
D. A community service order.
Answer B. A deportation order