MBE Review_Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Battery

A

Intent to Cause Harmful or Offensive Touching of another & Causation (result thereof)

Lack of Consent, Does not require intent to Harm, just a touching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

False Imprisonment

A

Intent to confine another w/o reasonable way to escape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Trespass

A

Intent to cause a tangible thing/item to enter the land of another

Mistake of ownership is Not a defense

(ex. soap factory caused particles to fall onto farmer’s strawberries)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Necessity (Private & Public)

A

Defense to Trespass

Private - entered someone’s land to avoid a greater harm (self or family members); limited defense, still liable for damages

Public - enter land of another to avoid a greater harm, but you’re saving Non-family members; absolute defense, not liable for damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intent to Inflict Emotional Distress (IIED)

A

Intent to inflict Conduct that goes beyond the boundaries of decency (extreme & outrageous)
leads one to feel depression, shame, anguish, grief (mental tort)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED)

A

P must have suffered physical injury from distress

Must have damages, unless (1) mishandling of a corpse or (2) false report of a death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Negligence Per Se

A

Protect & Prevent = statute designed to protect the party involved & to prevent the type of harm that occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rescuer

A

Rescuers are foreseeable P b/c Danger invites Rescue

reasonably prudent person standard - rescuer not liable unless negligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Invitee

A

Public guest

duty to inspect & to make safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Anticipated Trespasser

A

duty to be warned of known dangerous artificial conditions on property. no duty to inspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

jointly & severally liable

A

when two or more tortious acts combine to proximately cause an indivisible injury to P, each torteasor is jointly & severally liable for the FULL amount of Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Public Defamation

A

malice - knowledge of falsity, reckless disregard for the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Private Defamation

A

show mere negligence in publishing, malice not required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defamation - presumed damages

A
LUMP
Loathsome disease
Impuning a woman's chastity
Moral Turpitude - accusation of
Imputing someone's Profession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Privacy Torts

A
CLIP
Commercial appropriation
False Light
Intrusion into one's seclusion/solitude
Public disclosure of private facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Private Nuisance

A

disturbance that poses substantial interference w/ person’s use and enjoyment of property

must be offensive/obnoxious to an average, reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Public Nuisance

A

interference with the public’s health or safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Defamation elements

A

(i) defamatory language on the part of the defendant;
(ii) the defamatory language must be “of or concerning” the plaintiff (i.e., it must identify the plaintiff to a reasonable reader, listener, or viewer);
(iii) publication of the defamatory language by the defendant to a third person; and
(iv) damage to the reputation of the plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What constitutes Publication element for Defamation

A

communication to the third person must be made either intentionally or negligently; if it was not reasonably foreseeable that the defamatory statement would be overheard by the sales representative, the fault requirement for the publication element is not satisfied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a doctor’s standard of care?

A

a doctor proposing a course of treatment has a duty to provide patient w/ enough information about its risk to enable patient to make an informed consent to the treatment

21
Q

what is required of a professional?

A

a professional is required to possess and exercise the knowledge and skill of a member of the profession or occupation in good standing

22
Q

A product can be the basis for a products liability action when…

A

it is in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to users

23
Q

What is a Manufacturing Defect?

A

When the product as supplied is different than the way it should have been supplied

24
Q

When will a product be deemed defective?

A

If it was dangerous beyond the expectatio of the ordinary consumer

25
Q

Elements of a products liability action based on strict liability:

A

1) D is a commercial supplier
2) D produced or sold a product that was defective when it left D’s control
3) Defective product was actual & proximate cause of P’s injury AND
4) P suffered damages to person or property

26
Q

Under UCC, to establish an action based on breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability, P must show:

A

1) D is a Merchant who deals in kind of goods sold
2) goods were not fit for ordinary purposes for which goods are sold
3) goods were actual & proximate cause of injury to P AND
4) P suffered economic loss or damages to person or property

27
Q

Summers v Tice unascertainable causes approach:

A

both D were negligent, but not clear which caused harm, so each was required to show his negligence was not cause of P’s injury

28
Q

Sindell v Abbot Lab Unascertainable causes approach =

A

same defective drug distributed by all companies, so ct imposed market share damages on D

29
Q

To whom does a products liabiliity action based on strict liability apply?

A

Any commercial supplier, including a retailer of a defective product

30
Q

Why may retailer be liable for manufacturing or design defect?

A

b/c it was a Commercial Supplier of a Defective Product, even if it had no opportunity to inspect manufacturer’s product before selling it

31
Q

What is the general standard of care for Children?

A

Child of like age, education, intelligence & experience

Exception: when child engages in potentially dangerous activity normally undertaken only by adults, child required to conform to same standard of care as adults engaging in the activity = reasonably prudent adult

32
Q

Landowner duty to Anticipated Trespasser =

A

Duty to warn of or make safe highly dangerous artificial conditions that trespasser is unlikely to discover

33
Q

Attractive Nuisance Doctrine:

A

1) Dangerous condition present on land which owner is or should be aware
2) Knows or should know young persons frequent vicinity
3) Condition likely to cause injury (child inability to appreciate risk) AND
4) Expense of remedying situation is slight compared w/ magnitude of risk

34
Q

Rule for Rescuer:

A

As general rule, no duty imposed on person to come to aid of another absent special relationship btw persons.

However, if person gratuitously comes to aid other, the actor must exercise due care in providing assistance, and must not leave person in a worse position than when she found him (not act negligently)

35
Q

Defective product- Strict liability action elements

A

1) commercial supplier
2) production or sale of defective product unreasonably dangerous to users
3) actual & proximate cause
4) damages

36
Q

A commercial supplier’s potential liability for a defective product extends to…

A

All foreseeable Plaintiffs

37
Q

Tet for whether a food product is in a defective condition:

A

Product must be dangerous beyond the expectation of a reasonable consumer

38
Q

Res Ipa Loquitur Doctrine:

A

Enable P to establish breach of duty just from fact that an injury occurred that would not ordinarily occur unless someone was negligent

39
Q

To establish a prima facie case of False Imprisonment, P must show:

A

1) An act or omission to act by D that confines or restrains P to bounded area
2) intent on part of D to confine or restrain P AND
3) Causation

40
Q

Actionable confinement encompasses…

A

the failure to provide a means of Escape when under duty to do so

41
Q

Abnormally Dangerous Activity =

A

substantial risk of serious harm to person or property even when reasonable care is exercised

activity not matter of common usage in community

(blasting & manufacturing explosives) ( public fireworks - not necessarily)

42
Q

When may a Principal be vicariously liable for tortious acts of an Independent Contractor?

A

When IC is engaged in “Inherently Dangerous Activities”

43
Q

“Inherently Dangerous Activities” =

A

Special dangers t others inherent in or normal to activity

does not have to be classified as abnormally dangerous) = (fireworks

44
Q

Duty to exercise reasonable care in any activity =

A

Conduct should conform to that of a reasonably prudent person engaged in a like activity

45
Q

Actual cause =

A

But for test

46
Q

Proximate cause =

A

injury directly foreseeable result of action

47
Q

Comparative Negligence =

A

Fault apportioned between parties

48
Q

Abnormally dangerous =

A

A defendant may be held strictly liable for an activity that is deemed abnormally dangerous.

(i) the activity must create a foreseeable risk of serious harm even when reasonable care is exercised by all actors; and
(ii) the activity is not a matter of common usage in the community.

(ex - Fumigating is commonly held to be an abnormally dangerous activity for which strict liability is imposed.)