MBE Review Criminal Law/Procedure Flashcards
Common Law Murder
The unlawful killing of another with malice aforethought
Mental states for common law murder
1) Intent to kill
2) Intent to cause serious physical harm
3) Depraved indifference
4) Intent to commit a felony (felony murder)
Manslaughter
1) Recklessly killing another (involuntary manslaughter)
2) Heat of passion upon adequate provocation (voluntary manslaughter)
3) Misdemeanor-manslaughter (usually wrong answer)
If asked for the most serious crime the jury could find the defendant guilty of committing
Go with the the most severe if it is at all possible to convict on that
Rules where a crime requires recklessness
1) Prosecutor must establish an extreme deviation from normal behavior
2) Voluntary intoxication not a defense
3) If defendant makes a critical mistake, it must be a reasonable mistake
Mental state of knowledge
Knows, believes, or is substantially certain
Common Law Merger (MBE)
1) Solicitation merges with conspiracy, attempt, and the completed crime
2) Conspiracy does not merge with attempt or the completed crime
3) Attempt merges with the completed crime
5 rules for conspiracy
1) At common law, conspiracy just required an agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act (overt act requirement added most jurisdictions)
2) Co-conspirators are liable for the conspiracy and all substnative offenses committed in furtherance of the conspiracy
3) Withdrawal gets defendant off the hook for subsequent crimes in furtherance of the conspiracy, but not for the conspiracy itself
4) Successful withdrawal must be voluntary and communicate to co-conspirators in time for them to change their plans
5) Conspiracy does not merge
Robbery
The intentional taking and carrying away of the personal property of another by force or intimidation from the other’s person or presence with the intent to permanently deprive
3 rules for specific intent crimes
1) Prosecution must prove actual intent
2) If defendant made a mistake with respect to a critical fact, it doesn’t matter whether it was reasonable and unreasonable
3) Voluntary intoxication is a defense, but defendant must have been super drunk
Common law arson
Malicious burning of the dwelling of another
At common law, intentional burning of your own home is
not a crime
3 ramifications for malice
1) Can be shown by either intent or recklessness
2) Reasonable mistake is a defense
3) Voluntary intoxication is not a defense
Rules to distinguish larceny from embezzlement
1) When dealing with theft by an employee, the correct answer will either be larceny or embezzlement
2) Low-level employee with control for short period of time will be larceny
For searches in a home, which of the warrant exceptions generally can apply?
1) Consent
2) Exigent circumstances