MBE Practice Exam Cards Flashcards
What are the 3 factors for the collateral order doctrine
Under the collateral-order doctrine, a court of appeals has discretion to hear and rule on a district court order if it (1) conclusively determines the disputed question, (2) resolves an important issue that is completely separate from the merits of the action, and (3) is effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgement
When is diversity of parties considered?
at time complaint is filed
In general, who can file cases under diversity jurisdiction
US citizens and lawful resident aliens
In a class action under DJ, can parties join if they don’t meet the AIC?
Yes, they can join under supplemental jurisdiction as long as one party meets AIC
In DJ - When first plaintiff meets requirements and another plaintiff wants to join under permissive joinder, what do you need?
- doesn’t destroy diversity
- does not have to meet AIC since first plaintiff does
In DJ - when a defendant wants to join under permissive joinder, what do you need?
- doesn’t destroy diversity
- Claims against each D must meet the AIC
(Defendant who is joining needs to meet both diversity requirements because there’s no supplemental jurisdiction for Ds who join under permissive joinder)
___________ counterclaims don’t need to meet AIC
compulsory
permissive counterclaims need to meet AIC because supplemental jurisdiction doesn’t apply for them
What is rule 4k2?
A federal court may exercise PJ over a foreign D, even though the court would not otherwise have PJ over the D due to D’s lack of “minimum contacts” with the forum state
- P’s claims have to be based on federal law
- D must have sufficient contacts with the US as a whole
Once a court with PJ renders a judgement, does a court in another state need minimum contacts to render the judgement?
no!
How long does a D have to respond to an amended complaint?
14 days after amended complaint was served
When filing a pleading, does an attorney need to have complete evidentiary support?
No, so long as she’s reasonably sure she will get it after an investigation or discovery and she tells the court that in the pleading
What are the 4 requirements for a class action?
- numerosity
- common questions
- typiciality
- adequate representation
What kind of class actions require notice?
Common questions of law or fact predominate and class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy
When do pretrial disclosures need to be made?
at least 30 days before trial
When do initial disclosures need to be made?
at or within 14 days of the discovery conference
When do expert witness disclosures need to be made?
At least 90 days before date set for trial
What kind of judgements can be appealed?
final judgements only
When does a litigaent have third party standing?
when there’s a special relationship between the litigant and the injured party (i.e. private school asserting its students’ rights to attend despite a statute requiring attendance at public schools)
What is the difference between the Dormant Commerce Clause and the Commerce Clause? (When should you choose each one for an answer)
Dormant Commerce Clause – restricts the power of the STATES to act with regard to interstate commerce
Commerce Clause – gives CONGRESS power to regulate any activity that is commercial or is an essential part of regulation of a large economic activity that in the aggregate has a substantial economic effect upon or effect on movement in interstate commerce
Section 5 of the 14th Amendment does what?
- lets Congress pass legislation to enforce the EPC and DP rights of the 14th Amendment
- DOES NOT let Congress expand those rights or make new ones
When Congress delegates legislative power what needs to happen?
Needs to give an intelligible principle - can be ANYTHING and doesn’t have to be specific
Reasonable restrictions on voting get what level of scrutiny?
Rational Basis
Unreasonable restrictions on voting get what level of scrutiny?
Strict Scrutiny
What is an example of a reasonable restriction on voting?
a 30 day residency period
Congressional Action directed towards aliens is only subject to challenge under what standard?
When it’s arbitrary and unreasonable
When can a local government exact promises from a developer (such as setting aside a portion of the land being developed for a particular use or a demand for an additional expenditure, in exchange for issuing the necessary construction permits) when is that not a taking?
- If there is an essential nexus between legitimate state interests and the conditions imposed on the property owner,
- and a rough proportionality between the burden imposed by the conditions on property owner and the impact of the proposed development.
T/F - An ex post facto law doesn’t matter if the defendant is serving his sentences concurrently
FALSE - ex post facto matters as long as the law creates a new criminal offense that wasn’t criminal at the time D committed the offense
Where do you never have a right to picket?
At a particular residence
Can a “fighting words” statute prohibit certain viewpoints?
No - must be content neutral
When is a defendant not guilty as an accomplice?
When the person’s action is itself an essential element of the crime
What is the M’Naghten test?
a defendant is not guilty if he does not know the nature, quality, or wrongfulness of his act because of his mental disease.
What is malice aforethought? (needed for common law murder)
- intent to kill
- intent to inflict serious bodily injury
- reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life (depraved heart)
- intent to commit certain felonies (felony murder)
What is larceny by trick?
taking of personal property known to be owned by another that results in conversion of the property, with the intent to permanently deprive the person of that property, by fraudulently inducing the victim to deliver possession of the property
(when someone obtains possession of - but not title to - the property of another person by lies)
Can you assert a defense of others for property?
No! Only for defense of others for the other individual’s person