MBE-Ks Flashcards

1
Q

K – Req’ts of an Offer (3 Cs)

A
  • Commitment to be bound; communicated to offeree; certain + definite terms
  • Test = would rsnble person in offeree’s position interpret as offer, as opposed to invitation to deal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

K – Essential Terms

A
  • CL: all essential terms must be covered (parties, subject matter, price + quantity)
  • UCC: only essential term is Q (req’ts/output good enough b/c implied duty of good faith )
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Termination of Offer (K)

A
  1. Lapse of time (if not stated, rsnble period, as judged by nature of K, course of dealings, + custom in trade)
  2. Death or mental incapacity (unless option)
  3. Destruction or illegality
  4. Revocation (can occur constructively; effective upon receipt)
  5. Rejection (including counter-offer, unless option)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contract Acceptance

A
  • Objective manifestation of intent to be bound by terms of offer that is communicated to offeror
  • Offeror can specify manner of acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unilateral Ks

A
  • No K until complete performance, but gets rsnble time to complete once performance begins + can get reliance damages if offer revoked before performance began, but after $ spent preparing
  • Rewards and employee bonus offers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Acceptance of K by Shipment of Goods

A

If seller ships nonconforming goods = acceptance + breach unless seller “seasonably” notifies buyer goods are tendered as accommodation, in which case, shipment = counteroffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Gift v. Bargained-For Consideration

A
  • Could offeree have reasonably believed that intent of offeror was to induce action on part of offeree?
  • If no, always consider promissory estoppel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What Doesn’t Count as Consideration?

A
  • Pre-existing duty; Past consideration; Illusory promise
  • Modification at CL, unless unforeseen difficulties that would make performance impracticable (UCC only good faith)
  • Lesser amt as full satisfaction of debt, unless there was dispute or payment is of different type/early
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Promises Binding Even Absent Consideration

A
  1. Promise to pay debt barred by SOL or bankruptcy
  2. Promise to perform voidable duty
  3. Promise to pay benefits received where benefits material + not intended as gift, but only to extent necessary to avoid injustice
  4. Promissory estoppel (P reasonably relied + reliance was foreseeable; only reliance)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Unilateral Mistake as Defense to K

A

Only if mistake “essential element” and: 1. mistake would make enforcement of K unconscionable; or 2. non-mistaken party at fault (ie: acceptance of bid way lower than others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mutual Mistake as Defense to K

A

K, voidable if: 1. mistake existed at time K formed, 2. basic assumption of K, 3. material impact, 4. voiding party dn assume risk of mistake + 5. K cn be reformed to cure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Effect of Fraudulent Misrepresentation/ Nondisclosure on K

A

Fraud in factum: K void

Fraud in inducement: K voidable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Non-fraudulent Misrepresentation as Defense to K

A

Innocent or negligent misrep can still render K voidable if: material, induced assent to K, and justifiable reliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Undue Influence as Defense to K

A

Question = whether influence has prevented party from exercising free + competent judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duress as Defense to K

A
  • Subjective test: did an improper threat induce assent to K
  • Void if physical threat; otherwise voidable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Intoxication as Defense to K

A

Voidable if unable to understand nature + consequences of transaction + other party had reason to know; must be disaffirmed promptly, return any value received, + may be liable in quasi-K for benefit conferred

17
Q

Express Warranty under UCC Art. 2

A
  • Any promise, affirmation, description, sample, model that is part of basis of bargain; but not seller’s opinion
  • Disclaimers ignored; can only disclaim implied warranties
18
Q

Implied Warranty of Merchantability

A
  • If seller is merchant, goods must be fit for ordinary purpose; can be disclaimed w/ conspicuous “as is” language
  • DN apply if buyer examined goods or refused opp to do so prior to K and would have discovered
19
Q

Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose

A

Seller must have reason to know buyer has particular use for goods + buyer is relying on seller’s skill to select; can be disclaimed *in writing only*

20
Q

Written Release from K: CL + UCC Rules

A

CL: consideration req’d

UCC: no consideration if written waiver

21
Q

SOF Exceptions for Sales of Goods $500 or More

A
  • Specially manufactured, not suitable for sale to another + S has begun performance
  • Part payment (but only for that portion of K)
  • Receipt + acceptance of goods (but only for that portion of K)
  • Failure to object to writing w/in 10 days if both parties merchants
22
Q

Effect of substantial performance on damages

A

If SP, can recover K price minus cost to obtain full performance

if no SP, breaching party may still recover through restitution

23
Q

UCC Perfect Tender Rule

A
  • S has right to cure as long as time remains to perform under K or if reasonably thought B would accept non-conforming
  • Installment K: can only cancel entire K if nonconformity *substantially impairs* value of entire K
24
Q

UCC: Request for Assurances

A

Reasonable grounds for insecurity >> written demand for adequate assurance of performance + suspend performance

-if not provided w/in rsnble time (30 days max), may pursue remedy, but breacher may retract if no detrimental reliance

25
Q

Buyer’s remedies under UCC in case of non-conforming goods

A

Reject: notice w/in reasonable time; notice of particular defect; store/return at cost to S or sell on S’s behalf

Revoke acceptance: only if defect substantially impairs + accepted on reasonable belief S would cure or dn discover b/c rsnbly induced or difficult; must give notice w/in reasonable time and no material change

26
Q

UCC: Seller’s Remedies: Buyer Unreasonably Rejects

A
  1. collect damages (K price - FMV + incidental + lost profits if “lost volume” seller) and retain deposits in amt equal to lesser of 20%/$500
  2. resell (if private sale, must give notice to buyer)
27
Q

Destruction of goods before risk of loss passes to buyer

A
  1. total destruction: K avoided unless product fungible + easily replaced (hay)
  2. partial destruction: K avoided unless B chooses to take goods at reduced price w/out any other claim v. S
28
Q

B’s options upon rejecting nonconforming goods

A
  • If security interest (ie: has partially paid or incurred expenses inspecting), may sell in good faith but must acct to S for excess
  • If no interest, hold w/ rsnble care + make effort to sell if perishable/rapidly decline in value (merchant only)
29
Q

Assignment of K Rights

A
  • Gratuitous: last assignment controls + automatically terminates upon death of assignor
  • If consideration, 1st assignment for consideration wins unless later assignee dn know of first + obtains judgment first
30
Q

Bailor’s sale of goods entrusted to bailor for care

A

BFP from merchant takes good title if goods entrusted by O to merchant + merchant deals in same kind of goods

31
Q

Wharton’s Rule

A

If crime impossible w/out agmt, no conspiracy unless more agree (bribery, adultery, drug sale, dueling)