MBE Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Rule 105

A

limited admissibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rule 106

A

rule of completeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rule 401

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rule 402

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rule 403

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rule FRE 104(b)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FRE 606(b)

A

FRE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

FRE 608(a)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

FRE 608(b)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FRE 609

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Daubert test

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

potential bases for expert opinion

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

inquiry for

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A rebuttable presumption shifts the burden of production, but not the burden of persuasion, to the opposing party. Under the “bursting bubble” approach followed by the Federal Rules in a civil case, a presumption “bursts” (i.e., no longer has a preclusive effect) after the introduction of sufficient evidence by the opposing party to sustain a contrary finding.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly