MBE Flashcards
Is compliance with government authority/ordinances a defense to private nuisance actions?
NO. Compliance with ordinances can be evidence of reasonableness but it is not determinative.
When can you consent to defamation?
When you ask a person the reason why he decided that way. The person’s response, even if defamatory, you will have consented to.
What duty does a physician have to a patient before surgery?
Duty to provide the patient with enough info about the surgery’s risks to enable the patient to make an informed consent.
Who can bring a trespass action against a trespasser?
Only the person in POSSESSION can sue.
Ex: If there is a tenant and a landlord, only the tenant can sue for trespass.
Trespass elements
- an act of physical invasion of the P’s real property by D
- intent on D’s part to bring about the physical invasion
- causation
Property owner duty to invitees?
Duty to make reasonable inspections to discover and make safe any dangerous conditions.
Property owner duty to those adjacent to the premises?
Duty to protect them from dangerous conditions.
Private necessity
When the trespasser enters for his benefit or a third party’s benefit: liable for any damage causes
Ex: Swerve to hit a child and you hit a mailbox. No trespass but must pay damages.
Necessity: when is it an absolute defense?
When the trespasser enters for the benefit of the PERSON OR PROPERTY of the landowner
Ex: Person sees a barn on fire. He cuts through barbed wire and puts the fire out with a hose. He does not have to pay for the damage caused to the fence b/c he entered to help the landowner.
Wrongful death
Recovery is allowed only to the extent that the deceased would have been recovered in the action HAD the person lived
Negligent beneficiary of of a wrongful death action: what happens
In most comparative negligence jurisdictions, the negligent beneficiary’s recovery would be reduced by his fault, reducing the overall recovery by the estate.
Common law rule for car owners when others use your car
Common law rule is that a car owner is NOT liable for torts committed by another person driving the car.
Family car rule
Imposes liability on a car owner for the tortious conduct of an immediate family member driving the car
Public disclosure of private facts: elements
- PUBLICATION or public disclosure by D of private info about P
AND - the matter made public is such that its disclosure would be highly OFFENSIVE to a reasonable person
When is the public disclosure of private facts privileged?
If the matter is one of legitimate public interest AS LONG as made without malice (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth)
Is consent a defense to the invasion of privacy torts? Is reasonable mistake as to consent?
Consent: yes it is a defense
Reasonable mistake as to consent: NOT a defense
When does a physician breach his duty in proposing a course of treatment/surgery?
If an UNDISCLOSED RISK was serious enough that a reasonable person in the patient’s person would have withheld consent, the doctor has breached his duty.
When is an owner of livestock strictly liable for the damage they cause?
When it was reasonably foreseeable.
When is the owner of a domestic animal liable?
Animal had dangerous propensities
Strict liability: defective design
Product was in a dangerous condition unreasonably dangerous to users
What must P should to recover under a defective design strict liability theory?
There was a reasonable alternative design (economically feasible)
What happens in a traditional contributory negligence jurisdiction if P is contributory negligent in a strict product liabilities case?
P’s ordinary contributory negligence in failing to discover or guard against the danger is NOT a defense.
When would P’s contributory negligence bar recovery in a strict liability products case?
If P voluntarily and unreasonably encountered a KNOWN RISK
What happens if D negligently put himself in harms way and a rescuer is hurt trying to save D?
Rescuer is a foreseeable plaintiff. D breached a duty by negligently placing himself in danger.
Products liability: effect of an intermediary’s failure to discover a defect/danger
NOT a superseding cause. Manufacturer/processor will remain liable.
Commercial supplier: strict liability theory elements
- an absolute duty owed by a commercial supplier
- production or sale of a defective product
- actual and proximate cause
- damages
MBE: Who can be liable for intentional torts? What about in GA?
MBE: Everyone.
GA: 13 and under are statutorily immune
What does it mean for a tortfeasor to “intend”?
Intent the consequence if:
- it was your purpose
- substantially certain of the consequences
Two ways to transfer intent
- intended victim to actual victim
2. intended tort to actual tort
Battery elements: tort
harmful or offensive contact
with the person
Assault elements: tort
reasonable apprehension of
an immediate battery (offensive contact)
Are words alone enough for assault?
NO. Must be coupled with some conduct.
False imprisonment: tort
sufficient act of restraint
within a bounded area
False imprisonment: is awareness that you are confined required? How much time must you be confined?
Must be aware.
Length of confinement is IRRELEVANT for liability (could go to damages)
When will it not be a “bounded area?”
when there is a reasonable means of escape that the P is aware of
When will a shoplifting detention be okay?
- reasonable amount of time
2. reasonable suspicion
Intentional infliction of emotional distress
- conduct must be outrageous
- intent or reckless
- some physical manifestation of distress
Trespass elements: tort
- an act of physical invasion
- to land or real property
* no need to have knowledge
* mistake as to property line won’t save you
Trespass to chattels
- an act of physical invasion
2. to personal property
Conversion
- an act of physical invasion
2. to personal property that seriously interferes with the person’s right
Who cannot consent to an intentional tort?
- children
- mentally incompetent
- people who are coerced to consent
- consent obtained through fraud or mistake
Implied consent
Arises through custom and usage or through P’s own conduct
Ex: Touch football
Self defense elements
Reasonable force to prevent what she REASONABLY believes to be an imminent threat of force against her
Defending others
To defend others you can use same amount of force as the person attacked could use.
*honest mistake okay
Defense of property
Reasonable force is okay
*deadly force is generally never okay for protecting property ALONE
When is the necessity defense used in torts?
Intentional torts to PROPERTY only
Private necessity
A qualified privilege to protect a limited number of people.
Not guilty of trespass but must be for damages.
(landing in a wheat field example)
Public necessity
An absolute privilege to protect a lot of people.
Not guilty of trespass OR damages
(destruction of houses to stop wildfire)
Defamation (for speech NOT involving public concern)
- defamatory statement
- statement is OF and concerning P
- statement published to 3rd party (spoken or written)
- damage to reputation
Defamation elements: publication
Publication must be intentional or negligent and third party who it was published to must be capable of understanding the statement.
(ex: if someone overhears a private conversation, no defamation)
Who bears the burden of proving truth/falsity in common law defamation?
D bears the burden of proving truth of the statement he made.
What is written defamation called? What is spoken defamation called?
Written: libel (damages presumed)
Spoken: slander (must prove special damages) subject to exceptions for libel per se
When will damages be presumed b/c of libel per se?
- statement is about P’s business/trade
- statement accuses P of serious crime
- statement accuses P of loathsome disease
- statement accuses P of unchastity
What are defenses to defamation at common law?
- truth
- absolute privilege (judicial proceedings, legislative, executive proceedings)
- qualified privilege