Marx Flashcards
(130 cards)
What does Marx see as “fundamental to human life” according to Joseph O’Malley?
Social-economic processes
What, in Joseph O’Malley’s view, are the two fundamental, interacting elements of social-economic processes that Marx identified?
- ‘Forces of production’
- ‘Relations of production’
What is another name for the Forces of Production?
Productive forces
What are the forces of production (in Joseph O’Malley’s words)?
“the creative capacities of human beings, which they exercise in order to meet their needs, and which they further develop in the course of that exercise”
How does Joseph O’Malley describe the Relations of Production?
“the social relationships in and through which human beings exercise and develop their…forces of production.”
What does the development of productive forces in society evenutally lead to?
A conflict between the forces of production and relations of production - relations become a ‘fetter’ on the advanced forces.
What is it that facilitates the development of the productive forces in society as a whole and of individuals?
The relations of production - but only at first.
How does Joseph O’Malley summarise the conflict between relations and forces of production?
“The antagonism is between forces that grow and relations that do not change.”
How is the antagonism between relations and forces of production resolved in Joseph O’Malley’s words?
“a social revolution out of which come new relations of production, a new social-economic form consonant with the enhanced productive forces prepared by the old, now-superseded social form.”
How are those caught in revolutionary change likely to interpret it?
Purely political or other ‘ideological’ terms.
What is actually happening in revolutions?
Human creative energies and capacities are bursting through, throwing off, ‘abolishing’ or ‘superseding’ the outdated social-economic relations.
When does one social-economic form give way to another?
When it has generated the enhanced
productive forces of which it
is capable. Those forces are what burst through the old relations,
which had become their ‘fetters’, and lay foundations for the new.
What represents the full development of capitalism?
The world market
What was capitalism destined to do as part of its nature?
Become the dominant world system
What does capitalism’s triumph simultaneously represent in Joseph O’Malley’s words?
“at once its fulfillment and the beginning of its supersession”
How is capitalism’s fulfilment and immanent downfall manifested?
The ‘crises’ that plague the world-system of capital
How does Joseph O’Malley describe the crisies of capitalism?
“They are the marks of the fatal antagonism within the system, and they are the harbingers of the revolution which will abolish it”
Why does Joseph O’Malley not see the fall of the Soviet Union as the triumph of capitalism?
“the ‘triumph’ of capitalism - if what we are witnessing is indeed a triumph - is an event predicted by the materialist guideline formulated in his early writings”
What utopian elements does O’Malley identify in Marx’s early writings?
- the ‘abolition’ (or disappearance) of the state
- the abolition of the division of labour, of labour itself
- abolition of private property
- the achievement by human beings, for the first time in history, of control over their own, and external, nature, and over the conditions of their lives.
What must happen for true democracy to exist? (O’Malley)
“Democracy, therefore, requires that individuals recognise a ‘genuine’ common interest and make an ongoing effort to resolve the ‘conflict’ between that common interest and their particular interests.”
How and the common and particular interests be reconciled?
They will become the same thing - a “synthesis of universal and particular” as Joseph O’Malley puts it.
Why is modern society not truly democratic?
People are wholly focused on their particular interests. “the lack of ‘even the semblance of a universal content’ that makes modern civil society a ‘war of all against all’.”
What would the post-bourgeois society be for Marx?
The first truly democratic and human society.
Why does Marx not see a republic as truly democratic?
Because its democratic arrangements do not operate within, do not ‘permeate’, the social-economic order of life.