Market Structures and Monopoly Flashcards
Monopoly definition
A Monopoly market exists when there is a large and dominant firm within a market that has monopoly power. The Firm can influence or even set the market price for a good and the quantity supplied.
AR curve is downward sloping and relatively steep, inelastic as there are limited subsitutes.
Pure Monopoly
This is when one firm has 100% of the given market share, this is rare.
Characteristics of a Monopoly
- Lack of subsitutes for consumers
- Barriers to entry
- Price setting ability, brand loyalty, lack of subsitutes and therefore downward sloping AR.
- Supernormal profits in both the long and short run.
Charateristics of a monopoly - Barriers to entry
Structural
- High start up costs, fixed costs.
- Incumbent firms may be large and possess economies of scale, therefore they have a costs advantage.
- Legal barriers (permission)
Behavrioural
- Brand Loyalty
- Intimidation, agressive pricing strategies, limit pricing, predatory pricing. EVAL CMA
Other
Knowledge of the market, and infomation gaps
Natural Monopoly
A natural monopoly occurs when there are very high fixed costs and powerful economies of scale of conducting business in a certain industry. This may mean that a company could be the only provider of a product or service in an industry ot location.
6 Disadvantages of a monoploy market
- Higher prices than in more competitive markets
- X-Innificiency
- Taking advantage of their buying power
- Potential for internal diseconomies of scale
- Lack of incentives
- lack of choice and variety for consumers
Disadvantages and EVAL - Higher prices than in a more competitive market
- This results in a welfare loss and a fall in consumer surplus.
- Firms are not producing at the level of QAE, Ppm is greater than PAE and QPM is lower than QAE.
- Firms are incentivised to maximise profits and dont take into account the interest of consumers.
EVAL
- Depends on regulatory barriers set by the government or other agencies. Is there a price cap?
- Objectives of the monopoly, are they adopting a long growth strategy, adopting lower prices in order to gain more market share and brand loyalty.
- Levels of regulation in the market, CMA? or thames water and OFWAT.
- How significant are the barriers to entry?
Disadvantages and EVAL - X-inefficiency
This could occur when firms costs raise because of a lack of competitive pressures. This can cause organisational slack. This can be caused by uneccesary spending on products. This can be felt by the consumers and prices could rise.
The principle agent problem is also a example of this
DIAGRAM
The principal-agent problem is a situation where an agent is expected to act in the best interest of a principal. But, the agent has different incentives to the principal, leading to a conflict of interests.
EVAL
- Owners can help limit the principle agent probelm with oversight or placing bonuses and incentives in the contract.
- Economies of scale, average costs will be lower and therefore outweighs issues that are caused my x-inefficiency.
- Small market, if its a small market they may not suffer from the principle agent problem.
Disadvantages and EVAL - Taking advantage of their buying power
Purchasing economies of scale, monopoly firms that are large in size and buy in bulk in order to reduce costs, this negatively effects producers down the supply chain who are selling their product now at lower prices.
EVAL
Bilateral Monopoly, if the seller to monopoly is itself a dominant firm.
Disadvantages and EVAL - Potential for internal diseconomies of scale
- Firms in a monopoly could suffer possible diseconomies of scale such as communication issues and a fall in productivity and workers becoming deincentivised if they cant see their own work.
- Costs for firms could rise.
EVAL
- Impact on profits, revenue is likely to offset any diseconomies of scale. So firms profits may still rise.
- If diseconomies of scale are a issue in the market is is unlikely a firm will operate past the point MES.
For example in a natural monopoly.
Disadvantages and EVAL - Lack of incentives
- Lack of competitive measures could result in firms not producing effectivelt and not producing the best quality goods.
- This could result in X-Inefficiency and a fall in dynamic efficiency, which could mean lower costs in the future.
- Lower quality and less diverse selection of goods for consumers
EVAL
- Shareholder activism, removal of the principle agent problem.
- Contestability, there could be threat of future competitive measures, forced to innovate.
Disadvantages and EVAL - Lack of choice and variety for consumers
- No subsitutes for consumers
- Quantity is set below the QAE level, fall in welfare and consumer surplus.
- Cant best match consumer prefferences, less utility and therefore they lose wefare.
EVAL
- Large profits can cause firms to diversify their products and create greater quality and choice for consumers.
- Contestability? Want to cultivate brand loyalty?
- Buisness objectives
- They could expand into other markets
Potential advantages of a Monopoly
- They can take advantage of potential economies of scale.
- Dynamic gains through reaserch and development
- Domestic monopoly v global competition
- The ability to become a monopoly in the future creates a incentive to seriously compete with rivals and innovate.
Potential advantages of a Monopoly - They can take advantage of potential economies of scale.
- Bulk buying and managerial economies of scale will reduce costs for firms and increase their profits, rewarding shareholders.
- This could be felt by consumers as the price level could fall, increasing welfare and consumer surplus.
DIAGRAM
EVAL
- You can be a dominant firm in a small market, therefore not suffer from Economies of scale.
- The larger the firm, and the less competitive measures means that firms are more likely to suffer from X-inefficiency.
Potential advantages of a Monopoly - Dynamic gains through reaserch and development
- High profits could lead to reaserch and development, innovation and dynamic efficiency.
- This could result in greater future profits for the firm and lower costs, this could be felt by consumers as lower prices.
- Possibly wider choice and greater quality products.
EVAL
- Lack of incentives in a Monopoly to invest the supernormal profits.
- Instead the shareholders may just recieved greater wages and dividens.