Market structures Flashcards
Allocative efficiency
● Allocative efficiency: This is achieved when resources are used to produce goods and services which consumers want and value most highly and social welfare is maximised. It will occur when the value to society from consumption is equal to the marginal cost of production, where P=MC.
Dynamic efficiency
● Dynamic efficiency: This is achieved when resources are allocated efficiently over time. It is concerned with investment, which brings new products and new production techniques. The alternative is static efficiency: efficiency at a set point in time. Allocative and productive efficiency are examples of static efficiency. Dynamic efficiency will be achieved in markets where competition encourages innovation but where there are differences in products and copyright/patent laws. Supernormal profit is required to provide firms with the incentive to invest and the ability to do so.
X-inneficiency
● X-inefficiency: If a firm fails to minimise its average costs at a given level of output, it is X-inefficient and there is organisational slack. This is a specific type of productive inefficiency as it occurs when they fail to minimise their cost for that specific output. For example, the minimum point on the AC curve may be at 100 goods at a cost of £5 each. The firm is producing 125 goods and so is not productively efficient. It costs them £8 to produce each good, but they could produce 125 goods at £7. Therefore, they are X-inefficient since they are not producing on the lowest AC curve. It often occurs where there is a lack of competition so firms have little incentive to cut costs.
Perfect competition
Perfect competition is a market where there is a high degree of competition, but the word ‘perfect’ does not mean it maximises welfare or produces ideal results. There are few industries which fit this type of market structure, one example may be agriculture but government interferences may prevent it from being so. In reality, the assumptions made rarely hold and no market is completely perfectly competitive.
Characteristics of perfect competition:
For a market to be perfectly competitive, there must be four key characteristics. These mean that demand for the firm’s goods is perfectly elastic, and prices are solely determined by interaction of demand and supply; the firms are price takers.
● There must be many buyers and sellers. This means that no one firm or customer will be able to influence the market. For example, the decision of one firm to double their output or the decision of one buyer to double their consumption will have no effect. If the firm did manage to have an effect, this would mean the market was no longer perfectly competitive as there would be one large firm and other smaller firms, or one large buyer and other smaller buyers.
● There must be freedom of entry and exit from the industry. This is important as it means that when a business is making profits anyone can enter that market and start producing that product for themselves. As a result, business are unable to make huge profits in the long run and if they are making losses they are able to leave. In the long run, they make normal profits.
● There must be perfect knowledge. This enables firms to know when other firms are making profits which will attract them to join the market. Moreover, all firms have the same costs as they can use the same production techniques. It also means that any attempt to raise prices above the level determined by the market will lead to no sales, as customers will be aware they can buy the same good for a lower price and firms know there is no point lowering the price as they will sell all their goods at the higher price determined by the market.
● The product must be homogenous, where they are identical so it is impossible to tell the difference between one make and another e.g. semi-skimmed milk. This is important because it means if a firm raises it price above the competitors’ no one will buy it and they will not gain from lowering their price because they can sell all of your product at the same price as everyone else.
Profit maximising equilibrium for perfect competition
Firms are assumed to short run profit maximise and so the firm will produce at MC=MR. In the short run, it is possible for the firm to make a normal profit, a supernormal profit or a loss. However, firms in perfect competition can only make normal profit in the long run. This can be seen on the diagram.
In the short run, firms are making the supernormal profit of the shaded area. Prices are set by the market at P1, where S1=D1. As a result, the firm faces the demand curve of AR1=MR1 and produce where MC=MR1 at Q1 goods. However, since there is perfect information and ease of entry, the fact they are making supernormal profits will encourage new entrants to the market. This will increase supply from S1 to S2 and lead to a fall in price from P1 to P2. The firm now has the demand curve AR2=MR2 and produces where MC=MR2 at Q2. This is also where AR2=AC and so they are making normal profits. If the firm was making a loss, firms would leave the industry and this would decrease supply, pushing prices up and reverting to the long run equilibrium.
Efficiency for perfect competition
● Perfect competition is productively efficient, since they produce where MC=AC. They are also allocative efficient since they produce where P=MC. Thus, they are static efficient.
● However, they are not dynamic efficient. No single firm will have enough for research and development and small firms struggle to receive finance. The existence of perfect information also means one firms’ invention will be adopted by another firm and so the investment will give the firm no competitive benefit. Governments tend to have to do all the research.
● Competition should keep costs, and therefore prices, low. However, firms will be unable to benefit from economies of scale and this may mean costs are higher than they otherwise could be.
Monopolistic competition
Monopolistic competition is a form of imperfect competition, with a downward sloping demand curve. It lies in between the two extremes of perfect competition and monopoly, both of which rarely exist in a pure form in real life. Some examples of firms in monopolistic competition are hairdressers, estate agents and restaurants.
characteristics of monopolistic competition
● There must be a large number of buyers and sellers in the market, each of whom are relatively small and act independently. This means that no one buyer or seller has a large price setting power.
● There are no barriers to entry or exit, allowing new firms to enter when supernormal profits are being made and some to leave in the case of losses. As a result, only normal profits can be made in the long run.
● The difference between monopolistic competition and perfect competition is that in monopolistic competition firms produce differentiated, non-homogenous goods or services. This means that individual firms do have some price setting power, and so the curve is downward sloping.
Profit maximising equilibrium monopolistic competition
In the short run, firms can make supernormal profits, losses or normal profits. However, due to the lack of barriers to entry/exit, firms can only make normal profits in the long run. This is shown by the diagram.Firms are assumed to be short run profit maximisers, producing at MC=MR1 in the short run. As a result, they produce Q1 at price P1 and make a supernormal profit of the shaded area. However, in the long run, new firms will enter the industry as they know that supernormal profits are being earnt. This will cause demand for the individual firm to decrease and therefore the AR and MR curves will shift to the lift. The firm will produce where MC=MR2 at P2Q2. At this point, AC=AR2 and so the firm is making normal profits. If the firm was making a loss, firms would leave the industry and thus demand for the individual firm would increase as they had less competition. This would lead to normal profits in the long run.
The limitation of this model is that information may be imperfect and so firms will not enter the market as predicted as they are unaware of the existence of abnormal profits. Also, firms are likely to be different in their size and cost structure as well as in their products, which may allow some firms to maintain supernormal profits because firms cannot compete on equal terms.
Efficiency monopolistic competition
● Since they can only make normal profit in the long run, AC=AR and since they profit maximise, MR=MC. Therefore, the firm will not be allocatively or productively efficient, as MR does not equal AR so AC cannot equal MC and AC cannot equal MR.
● They are likely to be dynamically efficient since there are differentiated products and so know that innovative products will give them an edge over their competitors and enable them to make supernormal profits in the short run. However, since the firms are small they may struggle to receive finance or have the retained profits necessary to invest.
● In monopolistic competition compared to perfect competition, less is sold at a higher price and firms may not necessarily be producing at the lowest cost. However, the market will offer greater variety and may be able to enjoy some degree of economies of scale.
Characteristics of oligopoly
Oligopoly is where there are a few firms that dominate the market and have the majority of market share, although this does not mean there won’t be other firms in the market. There are four key characteristics of oligopoly: products are generally differentiated; supply in the industry must be concentrated in the hands of a relatively small number of firms, meaning there is a high concentration ratio; firms must be interdependent (so the actions of one firm will directly affect another); and there are barriers to entry.
Kinked demand theory
In oligopoly, there is a kinked demand curve. If a firm raises its price, other firms will not follow since they know their comparatively lower price means they are more competitive. On the other hand, if a firm lowers its price, other firms will follow since they want to remain competitive.
Therefore, we assume price starts at P1: above P1 the curve is elastic (since competitors are offering lower prices) and below P1 the curve is inelastic (since other firms lower their prices too so there is a little difference in sales for the original firm). The result is a kink in demand. This kink in demand means that there is a gap in the MR curve and so a rise or fall in costs or demand is likely to have no impact on price or output. Because of this, prices in oligopolistic markets tend to be stable. The problem with the kinked demand curve theory is that it assumes that there is an initial price set within the market and does not explain why this price was set.
However, it does explain why prices tend to be stable
N-Firm concentration ratios
● The concentration of supply in the industry can be indicated by the concentration ratio which measures the percentage of the total market that a particular number of firms have. The 3 firm concentration ratio shows the percentage of the total market held by the three biggest firms, whilst the 4 firm ratio shows the percentage by the four biggest firms and so on.
● It is worked out by adding the percentages of market share for the firms or using the formula:
total sales of n firms /total size of market x100
The method used will depend on the information in the question.
Oligopoly collusive and non-collusive behaviour
Collusion is when firms make collective agreements that reduce competition. When firms don’t collude, this is a competitive oligopoly. The UK energy market is an oligopoly that is suspected of collusion.
● If firms compete, they know lowering prices to gain new customers is likely to cause other firms to lower their prices;. However, if they work together, they could maximise industry profits.
● Collusion reduces the uncertainty firms face and reduces the fear of engaging in competitive price cutting or advertising, which will reduce industry profits.
● Despite this, firms may decide to be a non-collusive oligopoly since collusion is illegal and due to the risks of collusion, such as other firms breaking the cartel or prices being set where they don’t want it.
● A firm with a strong business model and something that sets it apart from other firms will not want to collude if they feel they can increase market share and/or charge higher prices than competitors.
● Collusion between firms works best when: there are a few firms which are all well known to each other; the firms are not secretive about costs and production methods and the costs and production methods are similar; they produce similar products; there is a dominant firm which the others are happy to follow; the market is relatively stable; and there are high barriers to entry.