Market Structures Flashcards
what are the characteristics of a firm in perfect competition
large number of firms:
- the firm’s output is small in relation to the size of the industry.
- firms act independently of each other, therefore the actions of one firm doesn’t affect the actions of another, unlike in an oligopoly
identical products:
- the goods being produced in this market are entirely homogenous - it is not possible to distinguish the product of one producer from that of another
free entry and exit into and out of the market:
- any firm that wishes to enter the market can do so freely as there is nothing to prevent it from doing so
- there are no barries to entry or exit from the industry
Perfect resource mobility:
- resources bought by the firms for production are completely mobile
- means that they can easily and without cost be transferred from one firm to another
Perfect information:
- all firms and all consumers have perfect information regarding products, prices, resources and methods of production
- ensures that a firm can’t produce the product at a lower cost without all other firms doing the sam
- also ensures that consumers don’t take a higher price than they should, as they are aware of the market determined price
why is a firm in perfect competition a price taker?
- the firm is such a small part of the industry that no matter how much it produces at the market price, it cannot influence the market price
- it is a price taker because it has no power over setting the price, therefore it is forced to take the same price set by the market, at all units of output
why is it that firms in perfect competition can only make normal profit in the LR?
- if firms are making supernormal profits in the short run, then in the long run, new firms will join the market, shifting the industry supply curve from s1 to s2, until it reaches the equilibrium price where normal profits are being made
- since firms in perfect competition are price takers, the new industry price becomes the new demand curve of each firm.
- if firms are still making supernormal profits, then more firms would join the market, shifting the supply curve to the right and lowering the price level further, thus illustrating how normal profits will be reached, as firms will continue to join until supernormal profits aren’t being made any more
Can firms make profits in the SR, and why/why not?
- firms can make supernormal profits in the short run, because during this time the firm has at least one fixed input, therefore the number of firms is also fixed in the short run
- this means that firms can’t enter or leave the market in the short run, which could have affected profits
what are the advantages of perfect competition
- productive efficiency in the long run
- allocative efficieny
- low prices therefore for consumers
- x-efficient
- competition leads to closing down of inefficient producers
- market responds to consumer tastes
what are the disadvantages of perfect competition
- lack of product differentiation for consumers
- not dynamically efficient - limited ability to engage in research and development, so therefore difficult to improve the quality of the goods for consumers
- can’t benefit from economies of scale
- based on unrealistic assumptions
- market failure - in the LR, firms might not satifsy consumer’s interests
can firms in perfect competition exploit economies of scale
- very unlikely that firms in perfect competition will be able to exploit economies of scale
- this is because firms make a very small proportion of the market and have a relatively small output, so they find it difficult to increase the size of their operations, especially considering that they can only make normal profits in the long run
give an example of a market which is close to perfect competition
- market for shares (stock market) - within each firm, they are selling a homogenous product, as each share is identical to one another, and they are selling each share at the same price
will you find advertising in a perfectly competitive industry
- No
- if all goods in perfect competition are supposedly homogenous products, then advertising serves no purpose because there goods are not more appealing than other firm’s goods
why is perfect competition unlikely in the real world
- firms will want to adapt their good to make it more desirable to consumers, so that they can make more profit - most firms’ business objective is to profit maximise
- perfect information is unlikely, as consumers don’t knwo what a firm’s markup cost on a product will be
- firms never act independently of each other - they make decisions based off the actions of other firms
- very rarely is there free entry and exit from an industry, because entry into an industry requires sunk costs, such as advertising and installing online technology. Exit is also rarely free because products tend to deterioriate in quality over time, and so cannot be sold at the same price that they were bought, especially if they have been used for a long time
what are the three characteristics of a monopoly and define them
High barriers to entry
- difficult to enter a monopoly market due to economies of scale, branding, legal barriers, and the aggressive tactics that a monopoly might use to deter competition
one dominant firm
no close substitutes
- other firms aren’t providing similar goods, so a monopoly market is devoid of competition
what are the different barriers to entry in a monopoly
- economies of scale
- branding
- legal barriers
- aggressive tactics
- (control of essential resources)
how does economies of scale create a barrier to entry in a monopoly
- economies of scale - when as the firm grows the size of its operations, its cost per unit of output falls
- this results in the downward sloping portion of a firms LRAC curve, permitting lower AC curves to be achieved as a firm grows in size
- when economies of scale are extensive, this means that as output increases over a long period of time, costs continue to fall
- this makes it extremely difficult for firms entering the market to compete and be successful, because the monopoly firm will have a much lower cost per unit of output, meaning that it can sell its product at a lower price, while the new entrant, starting at low outputs, will have much higher average costs, and so will be forced to charge a higher price, which will make it uncompetitive
how does branding create a barrier to entry in a monopoly
Branding
- advertising the product that they are selling influences consumers, generates recognition, and establishes a loyal customer base if the advertisments are convincing
- new firms therefore face a disadvantage, as people will gravtitate towards well known brands
how do legal barriers create a barrier to entry in a monopoly
Patents
- legal protection over an idea or an invention
Copyrights
- protection over something you have produced
- copyrights used for arts, music, literature, while patents used to prevent others stealing technological innovations
- disadvantage for new firms, because it means that they have to build their product from scratch, and invest in research and development so that they can create their product
how does control of essential resources create a barrier to entry in a monopoly
- monopolies can arise from ownership of an essential resource
- e.g., DeBeers controls 50% of the world’s diamond mines, meaning that new firms will struggle to access the resource
how do aggressive tactics create a barrier to entry in a monopoly
- cutting prices
- advertising aggressively
- threatening behaviour
why will the monopoly firm not produce any output in the inelastic portion of its demand curve
- when PED is >1 (elastic), then cutting prices increases total revenue
- when PED <1 (inelastic), then cutting prices decreases total revenue
- TR is maximised where PED= -1
what is a natural monopoly
Natural monopoly
- when a firm can benefit from economies of scale so large that it is possible for the single firm alone to supply the entire market at a lower average cost than two or more firms
- it is more efficient for a single firm to produce this good, than multiple firms, due to high fixed costs and low marginal costs
- if the market demand for a product is within the range of falling LRATC, this means that a single large firm can produce for the entire market at a lower average cost than two or more smaller firms
give examples of a natural monopoly
- thames water
- UK power networks
why is it even more difficult for new firms to enter a natural monopoly
- barriers to entry will be even higher
- this is because the monopoly firm has benefitted from vast economies of scale, while new firms have much lower output and much higher costs per unit of output
what are the causes of such a large range of falling costs in a natural monopoly
- significant structural costs
- once the main infrastructure has been created, such as with a pipe network, it becomes much easier and cheaper to supply water to one more house, meaning that the marginal cost in a natural monopoly will be quite low once high levels of output have been achieved, becaause the water company only has to add one pipe in order to increase output
- similarly, once an electricity network has been created, the marginal cost of supplying electricity to one more household is much less than it is for new entrants.
- therefore, the average cost per unit gradually falls
why is the water supply in the south east most likely to be controlled by a natural monopoly?
- most efficient number of firms in this industry is one firm.
- better for consumers
- one firm can achieve lower long run average costs if they control the whole of the market, than 2 firms could controlling half of the market each
- this will occur because the entire demand for the product falls within the range of falling LRATC.
- fixed costs are high, because it usually involves building a network, incurring high infrastructure costs
- but the marginal cost of adding a pipe will be low
economies of scale in a monopoly?
- economies of scale - as output increases and the size of the firm grows, average costs decrease.
- allows them to lower costs and therefore charge a lower price, and produce a higher quantity
what are the advantages of monopoly power
Advantages of abnormal profit:
- dynamic efficiency gains - profit enables monopolist to invest in research and development, and thus achieve a more efficient allocation of resources in the long run
- better quality products for consumers - R and D can lead to better quality products for consumers
- lower prices for consumers - may be investing in capital goods, which lower average costs, by being more productive
Advantages of a natural monopoly:
- makes the most sense for some goods/services to be produced by one individual firm
- it is more efficient for a single firm to produce this good, than multiple firms, due to high fixed costs and low marginal costs
- if the market demand for a product is within the range of falling LRATC, this means that a single large firm can produce for the entire market at a lower average cost than two or more smaller firms
- avoids undesirable duplication of services which would create a misallocation of resources
- natural monopoly gives a chance for lower prices for consumers
- talk about vast economies of scale that natural monopolies in particular can access