Market structure and Industry Analysis Flashcards
What are Transaction costs?
The time and expenses, spent on negotiating, writing and enforcing the contract
What is a relation-specific asset?
It supports a certain transaction and cannot be used for another transaction without losses or additional costs
What forms of asset specificity exist?
- Site: assets may be located near each other to reduce transportation costs and increase efficiency
- Physical: Assets may be created with the assumption that they will be used with concrete inputs
- Dedicated: created for a particular buyer and useless for anyone else
- Human asset specificity: people who work for a firm learn skills which are only valuable within the firm
What is a rent?
Rent is the profit you expect to get when you build the plant assuming that all goes as planned
Rent=Q(P*-C) - I
What is a quasi-rent?
The difference between the profit you’ll get from selling to the intended buyer and the profit you’ll get from your next best option
Quasi rent = [Qx(P*-C) - I] - [Qx(Pm-C) - I]
- If Pm>C you sell to at leats recover VC
What is a relationship-specific investment?
- If I>Pm, you cannot recover your investment
- I-Q(Pm-C) is RSI (the amount of investment that you cannot recover if your company doesn’t do business with the initial buyer)
Hold-up problem
- If the asset was not relationship-specific, quasi rent will be 0 and P*=Pm
- In the presence of a relationship-specific asset, quasi-rent>0
- Hold-up problem: the firm can renegotiate the terms of the deal and holds up its trading partner
What are the consequences of hold-up?
- more frequent bargaining
- investments designed to improve bargaining
- reduced investments
What is technical efficiency?
It is the cost efficiency in the physical production of the good
- firm is minimising the costs of attaining the input
- usually market is superior
What is agency efficiency?
The extent to which the change of goods can be organised to minimise transaction costs
- integration is superior
Technical efficiency: graph
- As assets become more specific, the competitive advantage of the market firm is weaker and the scale and scope advantages decline.
- ΔT is always positive because market firms can take advantage of economies of scale and thus offer lower costs than firms who make it in-house
Agency efficiency: graph
ΔA measure the differences in exchange costs when the item is MADE or BOUGHT
- Positive at low levels of asset specificity because holdup is not a problem and the market is more competitive
- Negative at high levels of asset specificity because it requires more detailed contracts, narrows market and increases likelihood of holdup
ΔC
- production and exchange costs under vertical integration - production and exchange costs under outsourcing
- if C is positive - BUY
- if C is negative - Make
Implications
- large market -> BUY
- larger share of market -> more benefits from vertical integration
- multiple product lines -> more benefits from VI in the production of shared components
- asset specific investments -> VERTICAL INTEGRATION
Efficiency tradeoff and SCALE
- Vertically integrated firm enjoys better economies of scale
- the differential of technological efficiency decreases with every level of asset specificity
- the differential of agency efficiency becomes more sensitive to asset specificity
- ## the combined differential sharply declines for low asset specificity