Market Structure Flashcards
Explain derived demand in terms of shipping
- Derived demand refers to the fact that the demand for shipping services depends on the demand for the goods being transported rather than being a direct demand itself
- If global oil consumption rises, the demand for tanker shipping increases because more crude oil needs to be transported
- Conversely, during an economic downturn, when consumer spending falls, the demand for shipping drops as fewer goods are produced and traded.
- Shipping is highly cyclical and tied to global trade patterns, meaning that shifts in industrial production, commodity markets, and consumer trends directly impact freight rates and vessel utilization
Describe the structure of the oil market pre-1970
- Until the early 1970s, the oil industry was dominated by oil majors, who were thoroughly vertically integrated; from exploration, to production, transport, refining and the sale of refined goods
- These oil majors could control production, distribution and price in competition with one another, enabling them to make accurate forward price predictions and to keep costs to a minimum
Describe how the dominance of oil majors impacted the tanker markets pre-1970
- Within the tanker market, oil majors planned transport requirements including quantity, type of product and type of ship, and internally managed the strategy of tankers needed to fit their production and refining programs
- Oil companies owned about 40% of the tanker tonnage they required, and took another 40-55% of required tonnage on period time charters, usually of 3-15 years, with only the remaining 20-5% chartered from independent owners on the spot market
- For example, in 1970, BP owned about one third of its utilized tonnage, time chartered another third, and voyage chartered the balance – operating around 600 ships. At the time, Shell operated 1000
Give an example and brief description of seasonality in global oil markets
- Oil refineries adjust the proportions of different products they produce seasonally to match demand
- For example, in the US, more gasoline is needed during summer and more heating oil is needed in winter; US refineries produce more gasoline during the US driving season (late May – early Sep)
- The same pattern applies in Europe, however to a lesser extent as Europe does not have an equivalent ‘driving season,’ the distances travelled are generally smaller, more use of public transport is made, and cars are generally smaller and more efficient
- Although US cars are becoming more efficient, the country still accounts for 10% of global gasoline demand
- This variable product mix influences the choice of crude oil required for US refineries at any given time of year
Give an example of how tanker trades are becoming less relevant in global energy supply
- The increased popularity of AC, which already accounts for 10% of global electricity use and is expected to triple by 2050 (according to IEA), has increased summer energy demand in the developed world
- The proportion of electricity produced by burning oils has fallen to 10% globally from 30% in 1990, making tankers less relevant in energy production as other fuels are found
What role did independent tanker companies play prior to the market disruption of the 1970s?
They provided both time and spot charters, acting as a buffer to cover peak demand.
In 1973, around 75% of the independently owned tanker fleet was on time charter to oil majors
How did the structure of oil majors’ fleets benefit independant tanker owners prior to the market disruption in the 70s?
The high proportion of vessels on time charter (around 75%) provided a guaranteed income, enabling owners to finance and build new ships, keeping the fleet’s average age lower
What caused the major market disruption in the 70s?
The organization now known as OPEC nationalized their oil reserves. Oil majors redelivered their time charter tonnage or sold their own ships to release capital for exploration and production, causing serious financial challenges in the industry, leading to distressed sales in the second-hand tonnage market.
Why did oil traders emerge in the 1970s?
As OPEC countries nationalised their oil production, oil traders thrived as they could independantly negotiate spot or short term purchases directly with producers outside of contract prices that had been imposed by oil majors
How did the growth of oil traders influence the tanker market in the late 70s/80s?
- Traders struck more one-off deals than the majors had, and therefore used the spot tanker market to move the cargoes they’d bought and sold
- In times of volatile prices, traders’ preferences were to load either half million or 1mb parcels to allow for greater flexibility of sale, leading to aframaxes utilisation as tramp vessels
Describe how a fleet owner can use speed in reaction to falling or rising tanker markets
Vessel speed is one of the easiest factors for an owner to control. When bunker prices are high or market rates are low, owners may slow down their fleet to reduce fuel costs. Conversely, when freight rates are high, owners may speed up their vessels to complete voyages faster and secure new employment sooner, maximizing earnings at the higher rate
Explain how trade pattern effects efficacy of tanker markets in the fromat of an essay plan (introduction, 5 paragraph headings, and a conclusion)
Trade patterns significantly impact the efficiency of tanker markets by influencing vessel demand, route optimization, and freight rates.
1. Trade flow stability vs volatility (stable routes lead to predicatable demand allowing for efficent fleet deployment and stable freight rates; volatile routes caused by sanctions/etc create uncertainty and may lead to longer ballast legs)
2. Voyage efficiency and ballast legs (tankers are most efficient operating on triangulated routes to minimise empty return voyages; shifting supply sources will lead tankers to travelling longer distances without cargo)
3. Seasonal demand fluctuations (increased winter demand in the NH; weather delays)
4. Port/infrastucture delays (long turnarounds at ports in key regions such as China or the USGC reduce overall mkt efficiency; bottlenecks at canals force tankers to take longer alternative roiutes, increasing costs and reducing avalible tonnage)
5. Shifting production/demand centres (e.g. increased USGC VLCC demand due to higher crude exports)
Conclusion: fficient tanker markets depend on predictable trade flows, minimal ballast legs, and well-functioning infrastructure. Disruptions or shifts in trade patterns can cause inefficiencies, impacting freight rates, vessel availability, and overall market stability.
How do stable and volatile trade routes impact the efficiency of tanker markets?
Stable trade routes, such as the Middle East to Asia for crude oil, create predictable demand, allowing for efficient fleet deployment and steady freight rates. Tanker owners can plan voyages more effectively, reducing idle time and optimizing ship utilization. However, when trade flows are disrupted—due to geopolitical tensions, sanctions, or shifting energy policies—uncertainty increases. This can lead to inefficiencies such as vessels traveling longer ballast legs (empty return voyages), increased waiting times at ports, and greater fluctuations in freight rates, all of which reduce the overall efficiency of the tanker market.
What role do ballast legs play in the efficiency of the tanker market?
A tanker market operates most efficiently when vessels can optimize their voyages to reduce ballast legs—periods when a vessel is traveling without cargo. Ideally, tankers follow triangulated routes, allowing them to pick up cargo in different locations and minimize the time spent sailing empty. However, if major oil-importing regions shift their sources of supply—such as Europe reducing its imports of Russian crude—tankers may need to travel greater distances without a backhaul cargo, leading to increased fuel costs, wasted time, and reduced overall efficiency in the market.
How do seasonal demand fluctuations affect tanker market efficiency?
The demand for oil and petroleum products varies seasonally, impacting the efficiency of tanker markets. During winter months, oil demand in the Northern Hemisphere rises due to heating needs, increasing tanker utilization and freight rates. Conversely, during periods of lower demand, tankers may struggle to find employment, leading to lower utilization rates and a more inefficient market. Additionally, severe weather conditions, such as hurricanes or ice formation in key shipping lanes, can disrupt tanker schedules, causing delays in port operations and reducing the overall efficiency of the fleet.
How does port congestion and infrastructure affect tanker market efficiency?
Efficient trade patterns rely on well-developed port infrastructure and smooth turnaround times. When congestion occurs at key terminals—such as in China or the U.S. Gulf Coast—tankers are forced to wait longer to load or discharge their cargo, delaying subsequent voyages. Additionally, bottlenecks at critical waterways, like the Suez or Panama Canals, can force vessels to take longer alternative routes, increasing costs and reducing the availability of tanker tonnage in the market. Poor infrastructure, slow customs procedures, or inadequate storage facilities further reduce efficiency by prolonging turnaround times and disrupting scheduling.
How have shifting oil production and demand centers impacted tanker market efficiency?
Changes in global oil production and refining hubs have reshaped tanker demand and efficiency. For example, the rise of U.S. crude exports has increased the need for VLCCs (Very Large Crude Carriers) to transport oil across the Atlantic, leading to new trade patterns. Similarly, if major refining operations relocate closer to consumption centers, tanker routes may become shorter, reducing overall ton-mile demand. On the other hand, if production moves to more remote locations, tankers must travel longer distances, which can increase costs and reduce market efficiency.
How does the wait time between vessel fixtures impact the tanker freight market?
Shorter wait times indicate strong market demand and higher rates, while longer wait times signal oversupply, leading to lower rates and reduced efficiency in the tanker market.
Freight Rate Volatility – When ships experience long wait times between fixtures, it indicates excess vessel supply relative to demand, leading to lower freight rates. Conversely, when wait times are short, vessel availability tightens, pushing rates higher.
Market Efficiency – Frequent delays between charters reduce the overall utilization of the global tanker fleet, making the market less efficient. Owners may need to reposition vessels or accept lower-paying voyages to avoid prolonged idle periods.
Operating Costs and Cash Flow – A vessel that remains unfixed for extended periods still incurs operational costs (crew wages, maintenance, insurance, etc.) without generating revenue. This strains cash flow for owners and may force them to accept lower rates to keep ships employed.
Charterer Bargaining Power – When many vessels are waiting for employment, charterers have greater negotiating power, as owners compete for available contracts. However, in a tight market with minimal wait times, owners can demand higher rates and better terms.
Fleet Utilization and Layups – If wait times become excessive, some owners may temporarily lay up vessels (taking them out of service) to reduce operational costs. This can gradually tighten supply and help stabilize or increase freight rates over time.
Describe the impact ship size has on trade routes
In short, the further cargo needs to be shipped, the larger the vessel needs to be to carry it economically in order to take advantage of economies of scale. If commodities are produced far away from the consuming area, transport costs per unit must be as low as possible to remain competitive against products from nearby. Larger ships make it easier to carry goods over longer distances within physical port restraints (such as draught, beam or LOA)
Discuss the weaknesses of pipelines as a method of shipping oil
Particularly in the Middle East, pipelines have affected the structure of the tanker market since the 80s, but political instabilities mean that these can be vulnerable
One example is the ESPO pipeline; this is in the Far East and exports Russian oil from Siberia via the port of Kozmino to the Pacific
* One factor to consider is the cost of pumping oil through pipelines, the cost of creating pump stations, and the energy required to operate them
* Other weaknesses of pipelines include:
* Vulnerability to attack
* Damage at one point impacts the whole pipeline
* Increased handling cost, e.g. pumping en route
* Low/fixed capacities
* Pipeline fees
* Contamination risk (e.g. organic chlorides in the Urals pipeline)
Who are the three main players in the chartering market?
The three main players are owners, charterers, and brokers. Owners provide vessels, charterers hire them for cargo transport, and brokers facilitate negotiations between the two.
Can an organisation act as both an owner and a charterer?
Yes, some organisations operate as both. For example, oil majors typically act as charterers but may own vessels as well. Similarly, shipowners may charter in additional tonnage to cover contracts when their own vessels are unavailable.
How do companies manage surplus or out-of-position tonnage?
Charterers may re-let vessels under their control when they are out of position or temporarily surplus, effectively taking on the role of an owner. Shipowners may also charter-in vessels via time charter (TC) or spot contracts to meet their contractual obligations (spot charters are usually only used to cover single legs of CoAs when an owner’s vessels are all out of position)
Why is good market information critical in chartering?
The chartering market operates in a free-market environment, making access to real-time information essential. Owners need to evaluate available cargoes in their region, potential ballast opportunities, market rates, and competition to maximize profitability.