Market Power Flashcards

1
Q

characteristics of perfect competition

A
  • Large number of small firms.
  • All firms produce identical/homogeneous products, ie no product differentiation
  • There are no barriers to entry or exit.
  • There is perfect information.
  • There is perfect resource mobility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

characteristics of a monopoly

A
  • One firm dominates the market
  • Significant barriers to entry and exit
  • The dominant firm is a price maker
  • Information asymmetry in the market
  • No need for product differentiation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

characteristics of an oligopoly

A
  • Differentiated or Undifferentiated
  • Difficult barriers to entry
  • Significant market power
  • Some competition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

characteristics of monopolistic competition

A
  • Differentiated
  • Low barriers to entry
  • Low market power
  • Good amount of competition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

meaning of market power

A

The ability of firms to decide the price of a good/service.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

profit maximization for perfect competition in the short-run vs the long-run

A

It is possible for a perfectly competitive firm to earn economic profits in the short run. However, in the long run these are competed away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

profit maximization for a monopoly

A

A profit-maximising firm will always produce where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, and this remains true for a firm operating in a monopoly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Allocative inefficiency in a monopoly

A

A monopoly doesn’t need to be allocatively efficient and there is no threat from competition to force it to allocate resources better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

welfare loss in a monopoly compared with perfect competition due to restricted output and higher price

A

High monopoly prices lead to a deadweight loss of consumer welfare because output is lower and price higher than a competitive equilibrium. High prices mean some consumers are priced out of the market because of a fall in effective demand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a natural monopoly?

A

A natural monopoly exists in a particular market if a single firm can serve that market at lower cost than any combination of two or more firms. This is because of the large investments needed to provide this good or service, so economies of scale won’t be achieved until much greater levels of output are produced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

collusive vs non-collusive oligopolies

A

Non-collusive:
Because a decision by one firm to change its price will have consequences for the decisions of other firms (e.g. lowering prices means other firms will follow suit and also lower prices), firms tend not to compete with each other on prices as the risk of a price war is too great. Instead, we tend to see large advertising campaigns, and other promotional activities like loyalty programmes. We call this non-price competition.

Collusive:
In a collusive oligopoly, businesses operates essestially like a monopoly, with the ultimate aim of maximising profits for each participant. Firms will all set output deliberately lower, at the point where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

simple game theory payoff matrix

(oligopolies)

A

Let’s imagine two supermarkets that are both considering launching expensive advertising campaigns featuring famous celebrities. Acting in self-interest alone means that the firms will both advertise, in the hope that the other firm does not. However, if they do, then consumers will probably not be able to decide between them and so there will be minimal impact on profits. Instead, firms should anticipate each other’s behaviour and the better outcome would be not advertising to save themselves the cost of the ad campaign.

Although the firms could be better off by cooperating, each firm, trying to make itself better off, ends up making both itself and its rival worse off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

price and non-price competition in oligopolies

A

Price competition occurs when a firm lowers its prices to attract customers away from rivals, thus increasing sales at the expense of other firms.

Non-price competition occurs when firms use methods other than price reductions to attract customers from rivals. The most common forms of non-price competition are product differentiation, advertising, and branding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

measurement of market concentration (concentration ratios) in an oligopoly

A

If five or fewer firms together have a market share of more than 50 per cent , we can safely say the market is an oligopoly. If fewer firms achieve a market share of 50 per cent then it is an even less competitive market structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

profit maximization for monopolistic competition in the short-run vs the long-run

A

In the long-run, profit-making industries attract new entrants, and in loss-making industries some firms shut down and exit the industry. The process of entry and exit of firms in the long run ensures that economic profit or loss is zero and all firms earn normal profit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why does monopolistic competition have a more elastic demand curve than a monopoly?

A

Because in a monopoly there are less substitutes to the product, making its demand less price elastic.

17
Q

allocative inefficiency in monopolistic competition

A

P>MC, or alternatively MB>MC, indicating that there is market failure. The market underallocates resources to the production of the good and too little of it is produced.

18
Q

advantages of firms having significant market power

A
  • abnormal profits allow it to invest in R&D, which will lead to new products and new technologies
  • economies of scale lead to lower unit costs, which can lead to cheaper goods
19
Q

government intervention in response to abuse of significant market power

A
  • Legislation
  • Regulation
  • Nationalisation (govt. taking control of the private sector)
20
Q

What can make a monopoly allocatively efficient?

A
  • leftward shift of the AR (resulting from a change in consumer preferences)
  • lower prices (brought about by govt. intervention)
21
Q

allocative inefficiency in an oligopoly

A

As firms in a collusive oligopoly behave like a monopoly, it is clear that there is welfare loss, allocative inefficiency, and market failure.

Yet the same is also true of oligopolistic firms that do not collude: they also face a downward sloping demand curve, and the market produces a level of output that is below the level where social surplus is a maximum. Therefore, there is also welfare loss in a non-collusive oligopoly.

22
Q

Benefits and limitations of perfect competition

A

Benefits:

  • Allocative efficiency
  • Low prices for consumers
  • Competition leads to the closing down of inefficient producers
  • The market responds to consumer tastes

Limitations:

  • Unrealistic assumptions
  • Cannot take advantage of economies of scale
  • The market responds to consumer tastes
23
Q

Barriers to entry

state types

A
  • economies of scale
  • natural monopolies
  • branding
  • legal barriers (patents, licenses, copyrights, and trade restrictions like tariffs or quotas)
  • control of essential resources
  • aggressive tactics
24
Q

Benefits and limitations of a monopoly

A

Benefits:

  • economies of scale
  • natural monopoly
  • R&D for product development and technological innovation

Limitations:

  • welfare loss, allocative inefficiency, and market failure
  • higher price and lower output
  • loss of consumers surplus
  • negative impacts of the distribution of income
  • lack of competition may give rise to higher costs
  • possibly less innovative
25
Q

similarities and differences between monopolistic competition and perfect competition

A

Similarities:

  • large number of firms
  • free entry of firms into industry (no barriers to entry)
  • normal profit in the long run, abnormal profit of loss in the short run (due to no barriers)

Differences:

  • Firms in perfect competition have no market power; firms in monopolistic competition have some market power
  • perfect competition achieves allocative efficiency in the long run; monopolistic competition does not
  • monopolistic competition has more product differentiation
  • firms in perfect competition cannot achieve economies of scale; firms in monopolistic competition have a small room for achieving them
26
Q

similarities and differences between monopolistic competition and monopoly

A

Similarities:

  • no allocative efficiency and therefore a form of market failure

Differences:

  • there are many producers in monopolistic competition; there is only 1 in a monopoly
  • in monopolistic competition firms are usually small; in a monopoly the firm is large and dominant
  • monopolistic competition has free barriers to entry; a monopoly has high barriers to entry
  • firms under monopolistic competition earn normal profit in the long run; firms in a monopoly can earn abnormal profit
  • prices are usually lower in monopolistic competition due to more competition
  • while firms in both market structures have market power, firms in a monopoly have significantly more market power
  • firms in a monopoly can more easily achieve economies of scale (firms in monopolistic competition still can achieve them, but to a much smaller degree)
27
Q

cartel

define

A

A formal agreement between firms in an industry to take action to limit competition in order to increase profits. Cartel members collectively behave like a monopoly.

28
Q

Benefits and limitations of a monopoly

A

Benefits:

  • economies of scale can be achieved due to the large size of firms, leading to lower production costs and hence lower costs
  • product development and technological innovations can be pursued due to high abnormal profits
  • increased product variety, thus providing consumers with greater choice

Limitations:

  • welfare loss, allocative inefficiency, and market failure
  • higher prices and lower quantities of output than under competitive conditions
  • loss of consumer surplus due to higher prices
  • negative impacts on the distribution of income
  • there may be higher production costs due to lack of price competition
  • possibly less innovative