Market Failure Flashcards
What is meant by market failure?
It is a situation where an unregulated market (without government intervention) fails to allocate resources efficiently and equitably, resulting in social welfare not being maximized.
What is wrong with the following explanation?
Street lighting is non-rivalrous because consumption of street lighting by one party does not reduce the amount left for others to consume.
The description is not CONTEXTUALISED enough, and only provides a definition of non-rivalry. The explanation below is preferred.
Street lighting is non-rivalrous because a lit street does not become dimmer after a pedestrian or vehicle has gone past it.
What is wrong with the following explanation?
Street lighting is non-excludable because it is not feasible to exclude non-payers from consuming street lighting, once the service has been produced.
The description is not CONTEXTUALISED enough, and only provides a definition of non-excludability. The explanation below is preferred.
Street lighting is non-excludable because it is not feasible or very costly to construct physical barriers to exclude non-payers from accessing a lit street.
Why is it important to illustrate the implications of non-rivalry and non-excludability when explaining how public goods result in market failure?
Explaining the features of non-rivalry and non-excludability only defines what a public good is. To explain how public goods result in market failure, the implications of both features need to be discussed.
What is the implication of non-rivalry in the case of street lighting?
Being non rivalrous in consumption means that the supply of street lighting does not diminish with an additional consumer. Hence the marginal cost of serving another consumer is 0. For AE, P=MC, hence the price charged must be 0. However, no rational producer would produce it at zero price as they are profit driven.
What is the implication of non-excludability in the case of street lighting?
Being non-excludable means that consumers can enjoy the good or service without paying for it. Hence, there is a free-rider problem where consumers are unwilling to pay for the use of the good. As a result, effective demand is concealed, which results in the loss of a price signal for the good.
How do we contextualize our answer when explaining how the presence of externalities leads to market failure?
Be very specific on what the spillover effects are, and who the 3rd parties are. E.g. in the case of traffic congestion, 3rd parties are employers who face a fall in productivity when their workers are caught up in traffic jams.
What is a general guide in drawing diagrams depicting deadweight loss?
The tip of the triangle always points towards the socially efficient level. In your written answer, explain that DWL is given by the difference between total social cost and total social benefit, based on the amount over/under-consumed or produced.
Summarise the MEDICAL framework used for explaining how externalities result in market failure.
i. Market failure definition
ii. Externality explanation (identify spillover effects, 3rd parties and omission under the price mechanism)
iii. Diagram
iv. Identify MPB,MSB,MPC and MSC in context of the market and explain divergence between MPB/MSB or MPC/MSC
v. Compare equilibrium quantity (MPB cuts MPC) and socially-efficient quantity (MSB cuts MSC)
vi. Allocative inefficiency to be identified - over/under-consumption or production
vii. Loss in social welfare (deadweight loss) to be identified.
Why does market failure result from the existence of imperfect information?
The free market allocates resources efficiently based on the assumption that consumers and producers have perfect information about goods and services, which allows them to make optimal choices (which maximizes their welfare). However, in real life, there is a risk of over/under-estimating the private benefits from consuming a good due to imperfect information.
How does market failure result from the existence of market dominance?
Market dominance results in market failure as firms with market power (especially monopolies) are able to restrict output to increase profits. Hence there is under-production of the good (P>MC) and allocative inefficiency results.
Why is there market failure when the price charged is above the marginal cost of production?
The marginal satisfaction that consumers derive from the consumption of an additional unit of the good (represented by the price) is higher than the cost to society from producing that additional unit (represented by the marginal cost). Hence there is underproduction and there will be a net gain in social welfare if more resources are diverted towards the production of the good.
Why are factor of production not perfectly mobile?
There may be occupational and geographical barriers. Occupational barriers exist due to the mismatch of skillsets while geographical barriers exist due to genuine terrain impediments (e.g. poor transport network) or emotional reasons (e.g. sense of attachment) which inhibit labour movement.
How does income inequality lead to market failure?
Producers are profit motivated and will only produce goods for consumers who are willing and able to pay for the good. Hence there is a lack of distributive efficiency, as only consumers with effective purchasing power (economic votes) will have access to the good, instead of those who need the good the most. This is most pertinent in the case of necessities.
What is effective demand?
Reflects willingness and ability to pay for a good
What are the 3 ways in which part (a) of a market failure essay can be REPHRASED?
1) Explain why a market fails
2) Explain why allocative efficiency is not achieved in a market
3) Explain why government intervention in a market is necessary
When part (a) of a market failure question is REPACKAGED into the following form: “Differentiate between public goods and merit goods”, what should the answer contain?
1) Non rivalrous vs rivalrous nature of good
2) Non excludable vs excludable nature of good
3) Different forms of market failure (i.e. complete versus partial)
- For part 3), it suffices to highlight one aspect of market failure in the case of merit or demerit goods (e.g. imperfect information). Students do not have to explain in full the different types of market failure that exist in merit or demerit goods.
When part (a) of a market failure question is OUTSOURCED into the following form: “Explain how the price mechanism allocates resources”, what should the answer contain?
1) Background explanation on price mechanism and self-interest
2) What and how much to produce (show demand and supply diagram depicting shortage or surplus)
3) How to produce
4) For whom to produce
When part (a) of a market failure question is OUTSOURCED into the following form: “Explain how the price mechanism allocates resources EFFICIENTLY”, what should the answer contain?
1) Background explanation on price mechanism, self-interest and allocative efficiency
2) What and how much to produce (show demand and supply diagram depicting shortage AND surplus)
What are the pros and cons of using a tax to tackle market failure resulting from negative externalities?
Pros
1) It internalizes the externality without overly disrupting the interaction of market demand and supply
2) Tax revenue can be generated to fund educational campaigns
Cons
1) There may be government failure hence leading to over or under taxation that does not eliminate deadweight loss. This is due to the inability of the government to estimate the size of the spillover cost with accuracy.
2) There may be hefty administrative costs incurred in enforcing the tax.
It may be less effective against consumers who have a price- inelastic demand for the good
What are the pros and cons of using tradable permits to curb market failure resulting from negative externalities in production (e.g. pollution)
Pros
1) It creates incentive for profit-maximizing firms to reduce pollution since excess permits can be sold for extra revenue.
2) There is limited disruption to the free interaction of market demand and supply.
Cons
1) It is difficult to decide on a distribution of permits that is fair (e.g. should bigger firms get more permits?).
2) Wealthier and large firms can continue to pollute heavily by buying permits from smaller firms, leading to pollution being more serious in certain regions.
3) High administrative and enforcement costs.
What are the pros and cons of using a ban to curb market failure resulting from negative externalities?
Pros
1) It is enforceable and effective
Cons
1) A deadweight loss will still be incurred, sometimes even larger than the original deadweight loss (recap diagram)
2) Proper enforcement is required to ensure compliance
What are the pros and cons of using education or campaigns to curb market failure resulting from negative externalities?
Pros
1) Effects will be long-lasting since consumer mindsets and behavior are altered.
Cons
1) Takes time to work and hence effects can only be seen in the long-term
2) Depends on the receptiveness of consumers
3) Running such campaigns may put a strain on government resoures, and there is an opportunity cost associated with such spending.
What are the pros and cons of using rules and regulations to curb negative externalities?
Pros
1) It is effective as it is enforceable and compulsory
Cons
1) It is a blunt instrument that distorts the free interaction of market demand and supply, and does not create long-lasting incentives for consumers or producers to proactively reduce the negative externality generated.
2) Enforcement costs
Evaluate the effectiveness of using subsidies to tackle market failure in the case of positive externalities
Pros
1) It internalizes the externality without overly disrupting the interaction of market demand and supply
Cons
1) There may be government failure hence leading to over or under subsidisation that does not eliminate deadweight lost (government failure). This is due to the inability of the government to estimate the size of the spillover benefit with accuracy.
2) There may be a strain on the government’s budget to finance the subsidy.
Evaluate the effectiveness of nationalization to tackle market failure in the case of positive externalities
Pros
1) It curbs allocative inefficiency arising from the underproduction of merit goods.
Cons
1) Duplication of output and wastage of resources if the government provides the good alongside private producers.
2) Higher extent of government failure arising from imperfect info (e.g. how much to provide)
3) Government failure could also take on the form of X-inefficiency. This is because a public producer is not profit-motivated and may have no incentive to minimize costs.
Evaluate the effectiveness of using education and campaigns to tackle market failure in the case of positive externalities
Pros
1) Effects will be long-lasting since consumer mindsets and behavior are altered.
Cons
1) Takes time to work and hence effects can only be seen in the long-term.
2) Depends on the receptiveness of consumers
3) Campaigns and programs conducted may put a strain on the government’s budget and there may be an opportunity cost associated with such spending
Evaluate the effectiveness of using rules and regulation to tackle market failure in the case of positive externalities
Pros
1) It is effective as it is enforceable and compulsory
Cons
1) It is a blunt instrument
2) There is significant distortion to the interaction of free market forces
3) Compliance must be ensured
Evaluate the effectiveness of public provision to tackle market failure in the case of public goods.
Pros
1) It is the only effective measure to correct market failure arising from the existence of public goods
Cons
1) Government failure can arise in the form of imperfect information e.g. how much to produce
2) Government failure could also take on the form of X-inefficiency. This is because a public producer is not profit-motivated and may have no incentive to minimize costs.
Evaluate the effectiveness of using price controls (AC or MC-pricing) to tackle market failure arising from market dominance (more applicable for natural monopolies).
Pros
1) It reduces the extent of allocative inefficiency arising from the under-production of the good (price is lowered and output is raised)
Cons
1) AC-pricing increases the incentive for monopolies to be x-inefficient
2) MC-pricing needs to be accompanied by a subsidy to compensate monopoly for their losses, which puts a strain on the government’s budget
Evaluate the effectiveness of using deregulation (i.e. introduce more competition) to tackle market failure arising from market dominance.
Pros
1) A more competitive market results in a lower loss of allocative efficiency (price is lowered and output is raised.
Cons
1) There will be loss of EOS and gains from dynamic efficiency when monopolies are broken up.
Evaluate the effectiveness of using campaigns to tackle market failure due to imperfect knowledge
Pros
1) Effectively tackles the root cause of the problem by filling in information gaps or rectifying product misconceptions.
Cons
1) May take a long time to work
2) Depends on the receptiveness of consumers