Management of SZ Flashcards
What are token economies?
- this is a form of behavioural modification where desirable behaviours are encouraged by the use of selective reinforcement
- e.g. people are given rewards when they engage in socially desirable behaviours
- the tokens are secondary reinforcers but can be exchange for primary reinforces
Who carried out a classic demonstration of token economies and what did they do and fine?
- Ayllon & Azrin
- trialled a token economy system in a ward of women with SZ > every time the p’s carried out a task such as making their bed they were given a plastic token with the words ‘one gift’
- these tokens could then be swapped for privileges e.g. being able to watch a film
- they found that the number of tasks carried out increased significantly
Why has the use of token economies declined since the 60s/70s?
- due to the growth of community based care & the closure of many psychiatric hospitals
- also because of the complex ethical issues that they raise by restricting rewards to people with mental disorders
- still a standard practice in other parts of world
How does institutionalisation develop and what is the outcome?
- develops under circumstance of prolonged hospititalisation
- one outcome is that people develop bad habits e.g. not maintaining good hygiene, stop socialising with others , more reliant
What are the three categories of institutional behaviour commonly tackled by token economies according to Matson et al?
- personal care
- condition related behaviours (e.g. apathy)
- social behaviour
What are the two major benefits of modifying institutional behaviour?
- improves the quality of life within the hospital setting e.g. makeup for someone who cares about their appearance
- it normalises behaviour, which makes it easier for people with SZ to adapt back into the community e.g. getting dressed
How do tokens economies work?
- tokens (e.g. coloured discs) are given immediately to individuals when they have carried out a desirable behaviour
- target behaviours are decided on an individual basis
- tokens have no value but are swapped for tangible rewards
- delayed rewards are ineffective > should be immediate
How can operant conditioning be used to understand token economies?
- tokens are secondary reinforcers because they only have value when the person receiving them has learned that they can be used to obtain meaningful rewards e.g. sweets or a walk outside
- these meaningful rewards are primary reinforcers
- tokens that can be exchanged for a range of different primary reinforcers are called generalised reinforcers
- at the start S & P reinforcers are administered together
What is a strength of token economies for the management of SZ?
- evidence for their effectiveness
- Glowacki et al > identified 7 high quality studies that examined the effectivenss of token economies for people with chronic mental health issues such as SZ
- all the studies showed a reduction in the frequency of unwanted behaviours
- which supports value of token economies
What is counterpoint to the strength of token economies?
- seven studies is quite a small sample of evidence to support the effectiveness of a technique
- one issue with a small number of studies is the file drawer problem which leads to a bias towards positive published findings because undesirable results may be filed away
- serious question over the evidence for the effectiveness of token economies
What is a limitation of the use of token economies to manage SZ?
- the ethical issues raised
- token economies gives professionals a considerable power to control the behaviour of people in the role of patient
- this inevitably involves imposing one persons norms on to other, which is problematic if target behaviours are not identified sensitively
- e.g. someone who likes to look scruffy & get up late might have these personal freedoms taken from them
- moreover, restricting the availability of pleasures to people who don’t behave as desired, means that seriously ill people who are already experiencing distressing symptoms have a even worse time
- this means the benefits of token economies may be outweighed by their impact on personal freedom & short term reduction in the quality of life
What is another limitation of token economies?
- is the existence of more pleasant and ethical alternatives
- there are other approaches with a comparable evidence base that do not raise the same ethical issues
- e.g. a review by Chiang et al concluded that art therapy might be a good alternative > because evidence shows that art therapy is a high gain low risk approach to managing SZ
- unlike alternatives, art therapy is a pleasant experience without major risks of side effects or ethical abuses
- NICE recommend art therapy for SZ + better alternative
What is another limitation of token economies for managing SZ? EvL extra
- token economies are difficult to apply outside of structured settings such as hospitals
- Their success depends on consistent reinforcement > may be hard to maintain in community settings or at home
- Once the structure is removed, the learned behaviours may not persist > limits the long-term usefulness of the approach
- this weakens its external validity, as patients often return to environments where the token system is not in place.