Making risky choices: The economics of crime Week 1 Flashcards
Economics of crime overview
- Decision to commit a crime is considered a rational one: analysed as a choice based on costs and benefits of different outcomes
- Driven by consequences of different choices - differ depending on available opportunities
- How does education impact decision to commit a crime? - consider how school dropout limits opportunities to make a better living
Why do some people participate in criminal activities?
- Some crimes have little or no economic basis e.g., emotionally driven murder
-Others have a stronger economic basis - choices can be considered the result of some kind of cost-benefit calculation, e.g., burglary, robbery etc - benefits/rewards of crime = source of potential consumption utility for the criminal - Opportunity cost of crime - people with more to lose are less likely to commit crime - crime can be reduced by influencing opportunities for potential offenders
- link between crime and unemployment
The decision to commit the risky criminal activity (equation)
- Commit the crime if: expected benefits - expected costs > net benefits of next best option (the opportunity cost)
- If not caught payoff = Π (benefits/motivation for the crime)
- If caught penalty = C and lose Π (direct/explicit and implicit(risky) costs of crime)
- Next best option = J (no/less risk) (opportunity costs)
Immediate benefits likely to be less than Π but benefits extend into the future - present value depends on the individual’s discount rate reflecting their time preferences
Crime as a risky business venture
Benefits: Money + satisfaction (e.g., status, thrill).
Costs: Risks (getting caught) + lost opportunities (better job or reputation).
Criminals analyze this like entrepreneurs running a business.
Psychic income = benefits from personal satisfaction (utility) e.g. due to lifestyle, kudos
Implicit costs = risk of being caught and punished and consequently losing social status/standing
Crime as a risky business - What does implicit costs depend on?
Implicit cost of crime = what you “pay” when things go wrong
- Chance of getting caught (Pc):
- Higher risk of getting caught = higher cost for the criminal
- Lower risk = lower cost - Losing benefits/profits if caught
- Penalties (C):
-Bigger punishments (like long jail time or heavy fines) = bigger costs
- smaller penalties = lower costs - Material penalties:
- These are physical or financial consequences, like paying fines or going to jail - Psychic costs:
- Losing your reputation (stigma) or feeling guilty
- Emotional and mental costs
The decision to commit the risky criminal activity
People commit crimes if:
(1 - Pc)U(Π) - PcU(C) > U(J)
(1 - Pc) = Chance of getting away with it.
Pc = Risk of being caught.
U(Π) = Payoff if successful.
U(C) = Penalty if caught.
U(J) = Rewards from a non-criminal job.
People avoid crime if: (1-Pc)U(Π) - PcU(C) > U(J)
- Payoff from crime (Π) is low.
- The higher the detection rate, Pc
- The higher the penalty if caught, C
- The higher the benefits fo the non-criminal option, J
- The more risk adverse they are (crime is a gamble)
- The less their time preference for money now compared with money in the future