Major Cases to know for Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

U.S. v. Florida East Coast Railway (1973)

A

Formal rulemaking only required when statute explicitly mandates “on the record after hearing.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC (1978)

A

Courts can’t impose extra procedural requirements beyond APA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm (1983)

A

Agencies must provide reasoned explanation for rescinding rules; hard look doctrine applied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe (1971)

A

Courts can review informal decisions for arbitrariness; “hard look” standard reinforced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Goldberg v. Kelly (1970)

A

Pre-termination hearing required for welfare benefits; benefits treated as a property right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)

A

Created balancing test for due process in admin hearings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1915)

A

No due process hearing required for broad policy decisions affecting large groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Board of Curators v. Horowitz (1978)

A

Academic dismissals don’t require full hearings; less stringent due process for academic evaluations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cinderella Finishing Schools v. FTC (1970)

A

Agencies must consider the whole record in decisions; fairness doctrine reinforced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States (1920)

A

Exclusionary rule origin (“fruit of the poisonous tree”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

A

Exclusionary rule applies to states—but not always to agencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Heckler v. Chaney (1985)

A

Agency non-enforcement decisions usually not reviewable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner (1967)

A

Ripeness doctrine; pre-enforcement review allowed if rule has immediate impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Association of Data Processing Service Orgs. v. Camp (1970)

A

Standing; defined “zone of interests” and injury requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974

A

Mootness doctrine; case dismissed when controversy ended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly