Macroeconomic Objectives Flashcards
Pros and cons consumption led growth
A:
Largest component of AD (60%+)
Firms have more profit so multiplier effect
People have more RDY so less gov spending on benefits
D:
Not good if debt fuelled - unsustainable- may default on loan - hurts future demand - if IR increases, less borrowing
Consumption is volatile - depends on economic cycle - if spend lots on imports, high MPW
Wealth impacts C
Not all consumption beneficial if bad for environment
Pros and cons investment led growth
A:
Supply side effects
Non inflationary economic growth
D:
If I on poor Q capital, useless
Not beneficial in isolation, workers need training to use capital
Can replace low skilled jobs - high unemployment
May be debt fuelled #zombiefirms
Pros and cons export led growth
A:
More injections into circular flow of income
More profit, more investment- increase productive capacity
Development of facilitating industries like logistics and transportation
D:
Or one to exogenous shocks e.g. fall in RDY abroad
Demand pull inflation as AD increases
Protectionist measures reduce exports - may cause a trade war
Primary commodities have volatile prices and aren’t sustainable long term for developing countries
If export most of FoPs, won’t have enough to maintain living standard and products domestically
Causes of long run economic growth
Change in q&q of FoPs
E.g. subsidies, competition policy, education, healthcare, infrastructure, changing immigration laws etc
Increase in labour productivity
Increase in workforce size
Investment
Infrastructure improvements
Increase in competition
New resource discoveries
Pros of economic growth
Less unemployment
Increased tax rev
Reduced poverty
Use in standard of living
Increase power on international stage - higher GDP attracts more FDI - developed countries can export their products for cheaper
Cons of economic growth
Lifestyle - may have to work longer hrs - poor work life balance
Environmental cost - air pollution, extracting raw materials etc
Inequality - regional inequality between rural and urban where some receive investment - increased I in tech means higher unemployment but rich entrepreneurs own capital
Inflation - those with fixed or low incomes will have lower standard of living
Worsen net exports - SPICED
Causes of short run economic growth
Lower IR
weaker ER
Lower income/corp tax
Higher consumer/bus8ness confidence
Higher gov spending
Pros and cons of GPI
A:
Has many more factors weighted in than GNI that are a mix of short and long term
Looks at environmental degradation - counts pollution negatively e.g. if gov gives subsidy to reduce pollution, this increases GPI
D:
Very expensive and time consuming to calculate
Some indicators are subjective - e.g. Cost of crime
May be driven by 1 indicators that is very high rather than equal development in them all
Unemployment rate formula
(No. unemployed) / labour force(economically active) x 100
Labour force survey
Questionnaire of 60,000 households carried out by ONS - those out of work seeking work in last 4 weeks and available to start work in next 2 weeks OR has job and will start in next 2 weeks
A:
Can be used by all countries so policy makers can compare them and make informed economic decision making
Includes those who aren’t eligible for benefits but are unemployed e.g. frictional unemployment
D:
60,000 households not representative enough of 60mn people in UK
Claimant count
No. of people claiming JSA (job seekers allowance) each month - benefits
A:
Can be done cheaply as gov already have this info
D:
Some people may not apply as embarrassed - underestimated
Doesn’t count frictional unemployment as they can’t claim benefits
Doesn’t work in developing countries as they don’t have benefits
Causes of unemployment (add evils when u figure it out)
Frictional
Seasonal
Voluntary
Cyclical
Structural
Pros of full employment
Productive efficiency - max output
Living standard increased - more goods/services available and people have more income. More variety
Improved fiscal position - less spending on benefits, fiscal drag, increase tax rev etc…
Non inflationary growth - if gov use extra cash to spend on supply side policies
Improvements in development - increased gov spend into education, healthcare etc - improved HDI and GPI
Cons of full employment
Inflation - little/no spare capacity
Less international competitiveness - as inflation 8ncreases, more expensive for abroad consumers - less net exports
Higher CoP - FoPs more scarce so have to pay more to obtain the
Productivity decrease - when everyone employed, workers don’t have to worry abt being replaced so slack off
Whether full employment beneficial or not depends on
Quality of employment - low skilled zero hr
50% uk gig economy is underplayed
Control over inflation - if gov provide subsidies, firms can lower their prices
May spend on healthcare etc to increase health and productivity - increased quality of FoPs - AS increase