Macro Flashcards

1
Q

IS Equation

A

Ye?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AEPC Equation

A

Ye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

REPC Equation

A

Ya

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

NKPC Equation (two types)

A

Squ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Static MR Equation

A

Blo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dynamic MR Equation

A

Min

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What shifts WS

A

Changes in bargaining power
Aspirations of unions
Labour supply shifts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why does the WS slope up and the PS down

A

cant remember

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

5 Limits to rational expectations

A
  1. How can agents (i.e normal people) be using a model for their expectations when economists cant even agree on the model
  2. Large firms can predict future info to inform decision making, but most agents lack information or cognitive ability to form RE.
  3. non-RE agents exert more than proportionate e.ect on outcomes, e.g. if 50% rational, 50% adaptive, exp inf is not simple average of inflation at t1 and πT since RE agents know πT will not be achieve, given influence of adaptive agents and so adjust exps upwards, raising aggregate exp inf
  4. RE equilibrium founded on beliefs about actions to be taken by others, just like Nash equilibrium in game theory. if mon pol lacks credibility, or agents uncertain whether other agents rational, then exps will not converge on πT
  5. Even if all agents fully rational, sticky prices and wages can prevent immediate return to point A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is there inflation bias

A
  1. Policy seeking efficient employment in presence of distortions from imperfect competition. Equilibrium output is determined by WS = PS, but higher output would max welfare.
  2. Political cycle: raising GDP to display economic competence and win votes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How to fix inflation bias (4 methods)

A

ind. central bank
Rogoff (1986)
Walsh (1995) - Contracts and incentives (pigovian tax on inflation).
Svensson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why isn’t WS = PS socially optimal

A

MPL exceeds opportunity cost of labour. Socially optimal point would have higher output.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rogoff

A

1986

Delegation to conservative central banker. I.e. Beta in MC is higher. This means a flatter MR and smaller inflation bias.

Does not eliminate bias (needs beta to be infinite for that).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Walsh

A

1995

Incentive scheme. CB is penalised for each unit increase of inflation above target.

Penalty either in CB dismissal or CB resources, if penalty is high enough then the disincentive of higher inflation cancels out incentive to raise output

This leads to a return to original bliss point.

Essentially a pigovian tax on inflation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Svensson ZLB

A

2003

The Foolproof Way
Three measures
1. Explicit CB committment to higher inflation: An upward-sloping price-level target path, starting above the current price level by a price gap

  1. Concrete, credible commitment: A depreciation and a crawling peg of the currency. Done by CB selling domestic currency (easy to defend a depreciation), establishing credibility for the peg.
  2. An exit strategy in the form of the abandonment of the peg in favor of inflation or price-level targeting when the price-level target path has been reached.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Svensson Inflation Bias

A

1995

Set an inflation target below πT and when bias manifests it then raises actual inflation relative to this reduced target, returning it to πT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Alesina and Summers

A

1993

Looked at CBs between 1950-1980. Greater central bank independence is associated with lower inflation.

Interesting to see if this still holds in new monetary policy paradigm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How do inflation targets lead to secular demand deficits?

A

if debt contracts written on 2% inflation assumption but average inflation < 2% then real income transferred from borrowers to savers
Savers tend to have a lower consumption propensity and so the overall level of demand drops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Conclusions of Solow Model

A
  1. Investment in capital cannot drive long run growth in GDP per worker
  2. Need technological change (growth in A) to avoid diminishing returns to capital. (What does this look like in a graph). However, since technology is exogenous in Solow, need endogenous models to explain WHY technology is growing.
  3. Policy lesson: don’t advise poor countries to invest without due regard for technology and incentives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Solutions to Solow

A
  1. Labour growth? Nope. Why?
  2. Increased savings? Nope. Why?
  3. Technology growth! Yes! But Solow can’t explain it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Arrow

A

1962

Doing more production = firms get better at production = need less inputs (factors) to produce the same output

Motivated by observation that man-hours required to produce units (e.g. US Liberty ships in WWII) declines
significantly as more units are produced

LINK TO STRATEGY

22
Q

Fernald & Jones

A

(2014)

20% of recent US growth can be explained by a consistent increase in the number of years in education

Attribute 58% of recent US growth to rising numbers of researchers

23
Q

Starting point for Arrow

A

1962

A = K^Beta

24
Q

Starting point for Lucas

A

1988

L is now uhL, where u is hours working and h is human capital.
Accumulation of human capital over time (Ldot) = (1-u)h

25
Q

Starting point for Romer

A

1968

L is now ALy, where Ly is number of workers in production.

Adot = Lr*A

26
Q

Starting point for Jones

A

1995

Same as Romer, but Adot = Lr*A^mu

27
Q

Intertemporal budget constraint

A

?

28
Q

Core assumption for permenant income

A

(1+r)β=1

29
Q

Government Debt Sustainability

A

d + ( r - g )*b

30
Q

Consumer (Taxed) Budget Constraint

A

adfasdf

31
Q

Governemnt 2 Period Budget constraint

A

ewer

32
Q

Assumptions for Ricardian Equivalence to Hold

A

1) Lump-sum non-distortionary taxes
2) Consumers and government have same planning horizon
3) Consumers and government face same r→ no credit constraints
4) No uncertainty → no precautionary savings
5) Rational expectations
6) Homogeneous households

33
Q

Effect of relaxing assumptions in Ricardian Equivalence

A
  1. What are the assumptions?

2. Effect of relaxing them?

34
Q

DeLong and Summers (2012)

A

If hysteresis is occurs, fiscal stimulus can future supply potential. This increases future tax income and reduces the NPV of government borrowing. Fiscal stimulus can be self financing.
However, it depends on HYSTERISIS, FISCAL MULTIPLIER, and LR TAX RATE all being high enough

35
Q

Eggertsson and Krugman (2012)

A

►Shock hits debt-constrained borrowers who have to cut leverage
►ZLB may well bite because large r drop needed to induce other demand to take the slack
►Price drop would worsen things
►Very ‘Keynesian’ implications – multiplier, liquidity trap, effectiveness of fiscal policy
►Underlying point: the indebted face different constraints from others, so Ricardian equivalence breaks down

36
Q

Real interest rate

A

Nominal interest rate less EXPECTED inflation

37
Q

What shifts PS curve

A

Degree of monopoly power exercised by firms

Alternatively, what is left over from MPL after other claims are accounted for

38
Q

Population growth under the Solow model

  1. What happens in theory?
  2. What happens in the real world?
A
  1. Solow model predicts higher population means lower output per head.
  2. From 1960-2011, low evidence for this.
39
Q

Conditional convergence in the real world

A

Mankiw et al. 1992: Test convergence fro 98 countries in 1985. Conditional convergence exists, but is slower than the model predicts.

They then extend the Solow model with human capital and find strong evidence for conditional convergence, and convergence rate approximates the model rate.

40
Q

Absolute convergence in the real world

A

Very little evidence in the real world. There are isolated cases of this (South Korea) but for the most part, this is not the case.

41
Q

Technology catch up equation

A

fasdf

42
Q

Conditional convergence

A
  1. What is it?
  2. What does the diagram look like?

This is a plot of gk against k. For conditonal convergence, production functions are sA * f(k)/k. I.e. each country has different

43
Q

Unconditional convergence

A
  1. What is it?

2. What does the diagram look like?

44
Q

Starting point for Solow

A

?

45
Q

Derive Solow steady state k*

A

Do it

46
Q

Derive Solow steady state y*

A

do it

47
Q

3 Open Economy assumptions

A

3 of them

Small
Exchange rate regime
Equal inflation targets

48
Q

Condition for Solow Steady State

A

kdot = 0

49
Q

Assumptions for Dornbusch overshooting

A

1976

  1. UIP
  2. Short run rigidity of price and wage levels
  3. Rational expecations of inflation and exchange rates
  4. Expectations adjust quickly but prices adjust in medium run
50
Q

PS equation in open economy

A

wPS = lambda (1 - markup) / (1 + phi(Q-1))

51
Q

Derive Consumption Euler

A

Max two period utility subject to budget constraint

52
Q

Mankiw et al.

A

1992

Study of 1985.