macro 2.6 - macroeconomic objectives and policies Flashcards
expansionary fiscal policy
fiscal policy —> changes to government spending and taxation in order to influence AD
expansionary fiscal policy —> tax decreases and government spending increases —> AD increases
aims of expansionary fiscal policy? (macro economic objectives)
- boost growth
- reduce unemployment —> if AD increases —> demands for goods increase —> demand for labour increases —> labour is a derived demand
- increase inflation to hit inflation target
expansionary fiscal policy examples:
- reduction in income tax —> increased disposable income —> MPC increases —> consumption increases —> AD shifts right —> econ growth —> as a result of econ growth, this could attract investors and incentive them to invest —> I increases —> I is a component of AD —> AD shifts right —> econ growth —> positive multiplier effect
- reduction in corporation tax —> increased retained profit —> MPI increases —> investment increases —> AD shifts right
- increase in government spending e.g. healthcare —> boost G in AD equation —> AD shifts right
expansionary fiscal policy side effects (LRAS)
- main purpose of fiscal policy is to boost AD —> increase in LRAS may be a side effect
- reduction in income tax —> incentivise inactive to become active —> increase quantity of labour —> LRAS shifts right// for those in work —> incentive to work harder as they can keep more income —> productivity increases —> quality of labour increases —> LRAS shifts right
- reduction in corporation tax —> boost investment —> increase in quantity/quality of capital and increase in productive efficiency —> LRAS shifts right
- increase in government spending —> e.g. spending on education/health —> productivity of labour increases as people are healthier and have stronger human capital —> quality of labour increases —> LRAS shifts right// e.g. spending on infrastructure —> productive efficiency and quantity/quality of capital increases —> LRAS shifts right
conflicts:
- demand pull inflation —> AD increases —> higher demand pull inflation
- current account deficit —> economic growth —> AD shifts right and price level increases —> UK competitiveness decreases—> export expenditure decreases in the long run —> worsening of current account deficit// AD increases —> higher incomes —> more spending on imports
- economic growth —> negative impact on environment
- worsening of government finances —> more government spending and less taxation —> national debt/budget deficit could rise —> opportunity cost is created as they’re paying off debt (eval - in the SR, debt levels may be high but in the LR, the returns outweigh the debt —> increased gov spending and tax cuts can lead to long term growth)
evaluation:
- low consumer/business confidence —> income tax cuts might be saved —> consumption decreases// businesses —> increased retained profit may not be used to invest
- time lags —> tax cuts takes time to feed through into the economy e.g. households will take time before income tax cut is spent, corporation tax cut will take time before businesses invest
- ricardian equivalence —> consumers anticipate the future so if they receive a tax cut, they anticipate future taxes will rise —> consumer spending remains unchanged as they’re saving for the tax rise —> tax cut won’t increase AD because consumers would save the tax cut to pay the future tax increases
- in the SR, debt levels may be high but in the LR, the returns outweigh the debt —> increased gov spending and tax cuts can lead to long term growth
contractionary fiscal policy
fiscal policy —> changes to government spending and taxation in order to influence AD
contractionary fiscal policy —> taxes increase and government spending decreases —> decreases AD
aims of contractionary fiscal policy?
- reduce inflation to reach inflation target
- reduce budget deficit/national debt
- redistribute income —> higher taxation on the rich and redistribute it to the poor
- reduce current account deficit —> AD falls —> incomes are lower —> less imports
expansionary monetary policy
monetary policy —> changes to interest rates, the money supply and the exchange rate by the central bank in order to influence AD
expansionary monetary policy —> policies to increase AD
aims of expansionary monetary policy?
1. increase inflation to hit inflation target —> AD increases —> demand pull inflation increases (use keynesian graph)
2. increase economic growth
3. reduce unemployment
examples of expansionary monetary policy?
interest rates:
central bank will cut interest rates —> cut works through the monetary policy transmission mechanism
- low credit card interest rates —> cheaper to borrow —> greater incentive to borrow —> MPC increases —> consumption increases —> AD increases
- saving interest rates will fall —> ROR on savings decreases —> reduces incentive to save and increases incentive to spend —> consumption increases —> AD increases
- mortgage interest rates will decrease (money that needs to be paid back decreases) —> more disposable income —> MPC increases —> consumption increases —> AD increases
- lower interest rates on business loans —> cheaper to borrow —> greater incentive for businesses to borrow —> MP to invest increases —> investment increases —> AD increases
exchange rates:
- exchange rate —> the value of one currency in respect to another
depreciation —> value of currency in the UK falls in respect to other countries —> UK is more price competitive —> demand for exports increases —> export revenue increases —> net exports increases (improves current account deficit) —> AD shifts right
money supply:
quantitative easing diagram:
- y axis - IR (interest rates), x axis - QM (quantity of money supply)
- demand curve - Dm
- supply curve - inelastic at MS1 —> shift inelastic curve to the right at MS2
- as a result of quantitative easing, money supply increases from MS1 to MS2 (QM1 and QM2) —> money supply increases through increasing the demand for bonds or electronic printing —> as the demand for bonds increases —> price of bonds increases —> bonds and yields (interest rates) are inversely related —> this leads to a fall in interest rates —> this is because banks will be more willing to lend as they have more money —> as interest rates fall from IR1 to IR2, cost of borrowing decreases and ROR on savings decreases —> incentivises firms to invest and consumers to spend —> C and I are components of AD —> economic growth occurs
conflicts:
- demand pull inflation —> AD increases —> higher demand pull inflation
- current account deficit —> economic growth —> AD shifts right and price level increases —> UK competitiveness decreases—> export expenditure decreases in the long run —> worsening of current account deficit// AD increases —> higher incomes —> more spending on imports
- economic growth —> negative impact on environment
expansionary monetary policy side effects (LRAS):
- interest rates on business loans decrease —> businesses borrow more and invest —> investment increases —> quality/quantity of capital/productive efficiency increases —> LRAS shifts right
evaluation:
- low consumer and business confidence
- size of IR cut, money supply increase, ER depreciation
- liquidity trap —> where agents prefer to keep their savings instead of spending them despite zero/very low-interest rates —> monetary policy becomes ineffective
- time lags —> takes long time for interest rate cut to fully feed through the different channels of the transmission mechanism —> takes long time to have a full impact on AD
contractionary monetary policy
monetary policy —> changes to interest rates, the money supply and the exchange rate by the central bank in order to influence AD
contractionary monetary policy —> policies to decrease AD
- reduce inflation to hit inflation target —> AD decreases —> demand pull inflation decreases
- reduce excess debt + promotes saving —> interest rates increase —> reduces incentive to borrow money and increases incentive to save
- reduces current account deficit —> AD falls —> growth falls —> income falls —> less spending on imports
contractionary monetary policy —> higher interest rates// decrease money supply by selling bonds - price of bonds decreases - bonds and yields inversely related - leads to an increase in the IR - banks are less willing to lend as they have less money// appreciation of ER
pros:
- reduce inflation to hit inflation target —> AD decreases —> demand pull inflation decreases
- reduce excess debt + promotes saving —> interest rates increase —> reduces incentive to borrow money and increases incentive to save
- reduces current account deficit —> AD falls —> growth falls —> income falls —> less spending on imports
cons:
- lower growth
- higher unemployment
evaluation:
- time lags
- depends on size of change in IR, money supply and ER
automatic stabilisers
automatic stabilisers - counters fluctuations in the economic cycle (don’t need to know this but will help understanding - prevent you from reaching boom/recession)
boom:
- incomes will be high —> workers pushed into higher tax bands —> paying higher rates of income tax —> slows down increases in consumption and therefore slows down increases in AD —> controls extent of the boom
- unemployment is low —> government spending on benefits decreases —> AD doesn’t increase as much —> controls extent of the boom
recession:
- incomes will be low —> workers move into lower tax bands —> paying lower rates of income tax —> prevents large decreases in consumption and therefore slows down decreases in AD —> controls extent of the recession
- unemployment is high —> government spending on benefits increases —> increases AD and prevents deep recession
supply side policies
supply side policies —> policies designed to increase the productive capacity of the economy, shifting LRAS to the right —> if successful then all 4 main macro economic objectives will improve
4 main macro economic objectives:
- lower unemployment
- growth
- reduction in inflation
- current account deficit improves —> reduction in inflation —> COP decreases —> exports cheaper —> more internationally competitive —> demand for exports increases —> net exports increase
2 types of supply side policies?
interventionist (government intervention)
- government spending on education/training —> human capital increases —> productivity increases —> quality of labour increases —> LRAS shifts right
- government spending on healthcare —> more ppl treated and therefore less absenteeism —> quality of labour improves —> LRAS shifts right
- government spending on housing supply/transportation —> reduces labour immobility —> quantity of labour increases —> LRAS shifts right
market based (less government intervention)
- deregulation —> reduced barriers to entry —> incentivises new firms to enter the market —> competition increases —> firms will be more efficient to lower COP —> productive efficiency increases —> LRAS shifts right
- removing red tape —> reduction in regulatory costs e.g. less health and safety regulations —> COP falls —> profit for firms increase —> retained profit increases which incentivises firms to invest —> quantity/quality of capital increases —> shifts LRAS right// incentivises new firms to enter the market —> competition increases—> firms will be more efficient to lower COP —> productive efficiency increases —> LRAS shifts right
- reducing welfare benefits —> incentivises inactive to enter the labour force —> quantity of labour increases —> LRAS shifts right
- income tax cuts/corporation tax cuts —> lower income tax —> incentive for inactive to enter the labour force —> quantity of labour increases// for those in work, greater incentive to work harder as they can keep more of their money as disposable income —> quality of labour increases —> LRAS shifts right// lower corporation tax —> higher retained profit —> investment increases —> increases quality/quantity of capital and productive efficiency increases
- privatisation —> competition increases —> firms will be more efficient to lower COP —> productive efficiency increases —> LRAS shifts right
cons/evaluation:
- no guarantee of success —> e.g. no guarantee that gov spending on education/training will boost productivity of workforce
- cost —> government borrowing might increase —> worsen national debt —> taxes may rise to fund debt —> burdensome on tax payers
- time lags —> e.g. government spending —> takes a long time before infrastructure project is completed (spending on infrastructure) , takes a long time before we see an increase in productivity (spending on education and training), takes a long time before we see investment take place (corporation tax cuts)
- negative stakeholder impacts —> e.g. removing health and safety regulations can impact consumer/producer safety
- depends on the quality of services produced by government spending (e.g. depends on quality of healthcare, education and training etc)
laffer curve
diagram:
- y axis - tax revenue
- x axis - tax rate
- n shaped curve
- increasing taxes will increase tax revenue up to a point
- however increasing taxes beyond the efficient tax rate leads to a reduction in tax revenue
3 reasons why tax revenue decreases beyond efficient tax rate:
1. tax rate increases —> less incentive to work as workers keep less of their income —> workers work less —> less income —> tax revenue decreases
2. tax rate increases —> emigration —> highly skilled workers will move elsewhere (most of these workers are the highest tax payers to the government) —> tax revenue decreases
3. tax rate increases —> tax evasion/tax avoidance increases —> tax revenue decreases
