M5 - Pay for Performance and Salary Budgeting Flashcards
Pay for Performance
Pay for Performance Three Stage Process:
- Establish measures
- Communicate links between measures and assessment
- Assess performance against measures
Pay for Performance - Step 1 - Establish Measures
Establish Measures
Types of measurements – Measures may be financial or non-financial.
Performance measurement systems:
- Balanced Scorecard: focuses on financials (shareholders), customers, internal processes, plus innovation and learning.
- Economic Value Added: combines results, which are readily measurable, with enablers, some of which are not.
- Shareholder Value Added: incorporates the cost of capital into the equation.
- Activity Based Costing and Cost of Quality: focuses on the identification and control of cost drivers (non-value-adding activities and failures, respectively), which are themselves often embedded in the business processes.
- Competitive Benchmarking: involves taking a largely external perspective, often comparing performance with that of competitors or other best practitioners of business processes.
No one-size-fits-all approach
- Multiple, seemingly conflicting, measurement frameworks and methodologies exist because they all add value. They provide unique perspectives on performance and offer managers a different set of perspectives by which to assess the performance of individuals, teams and organizations.
- Under some circumstances, one particular perspective will be exactly right for an organization, whereas in another circumstance, it would be counterproductive. The key is to recognize that there is no single best way to view business performance.
Pay for Performance - Step 2 - Communicate Links
Communicate Links
Communication is the key to any successful pay for performance program. If communication is inadequate, employees will not understand what they are being measured against and what is important to the organization.
The organization must communicate the links between established measures and performance assessment.
Pay for Performance - Step 3 - Assessment
Assessment
The third component to pay for performance systems is the assessment. Basically, organizations (managers) will assess employees against the measures established. Assessment usually comes in three different forms:
- Individual: How did the individual perform based on the measures determined for the job?
- Team: How did the team perform based on objectives? When assessing team performance, it is important to look at how the team performed and how individuals participating on the team performed.
- Organization: Did the organization achieve desired results (both financial and non-financial)?
How does an organization assess employees?
- Formal
- Informal
- Performance appraisals
- 360 Feedback
- Coaching / mentoring
Compensation Strategy and Philosophy
Compensation Strategy and Philosophy
Where does base pay fit within the organization’s business strategy? To answer this question, an organization must first understand its compensation strategy and philosophy.
Compensation strategy: The principles that guide design, implementation and administration of a compensation program at an organization. The strategy ensures that a compensation program,
consisting of both pay and benefits, supports an organization’s mission, goals and business objectives. It may also specify what programs will be used and how they will be administered.
Compensation philosophy: A defined compensation philosophy is a statement of what the organization believes about how people should be paid. It should support the business strategy and be a good fit with the organization’s culture. A key component is how the organization intends to pay relative to its competitors for people – i.e., the desired market position
- Lag the market: The company will consciously set its pay equal to current market levels at the beginning of the year. The company’s pay philosophy will then “lag” the market as the year progresses.
- Lead the market: The company will consciously set its pay at anticipated market level. The company’s pay philosophy will then “lead” the market until the start of the next year.
Compensation Philosophy
The compensation philosophy is a roadmap that organizations use to assist in the development of compensation programs. Not all organizations have a written compensation philosophy.
A compensation philosophy should cover the following components:
- Market position
- Basis of job value
- Pay mix
- Reward focus
- Structure
- Administration
It is not:
- A be all, end all
- A simple statement that proclaims, “We’re a 50th percentile payer.”
Using a Compensation Philosophy
Using a Compensation Philosophy
Bounce new ideas: Bounce new plans, or modifications, against the philosophy to see if changes fit desired results
Proactive evaluation: Proactively evaluate existing plans against compensation philosophy to look for gaps in desired results
Possible needs: Evaluation will highlight possible needs for program changes to address gaps
Remember:
- A well-articulated compensation philosophy helps employees understand the intentions and beliefs of senior leaders.
- Employees actually understand why certain programs are in place, which leads to a more engaged workforce and a higher-performing organization.
Examples of Comp Philosophy
Attract the best available talent, while being competitive in the market place on base pay and above market on variable / incentive compensation. In order to retain our employees, yet still be financially responsible we will pay below market on benefit contributions – focusing more on pay for performance, for team-based project completion.
Provide training and development opportunities to new employees, to teach them the XYZ Way. We will pay less then market – based upon our world-class training opportunities. Advancement opportunities will be provided as employees learn new skills and exhibit the XYZ Way. We will offer market benefits for full time (40 hour) exempt store employees.
Principles of Merit Pay Programs
Principles of Merit Pay Programs
In regards to pay for performance and base pay, merit pay is one of the most frequently used methods.
Objective: The essential goal of a merit pay program is to link pay to performance in a manner that is consistent with the mission of the organization. There are two required conditions:
- Variations in employee performance must be measurable and measured.
- Managers must be provided with the necessary tools to determine the appropriate rewards.
Size: To motivate employees most effectively to meet or exceed performance standards, the absolute size of the merit increase must be significant enough to make a noticeable difference to employees (e.g., the increase must not be so trivial as to be deemed inconsequential).
-A successful merit pay program will ensure that increases awarded to the best contributors will be substantially greater than increases awarded to average or less-than-average performers.
Timing: anniversary-date versus common (focal-point) review
Implementation: Under traditional merit pay programs, merit increases are built into employees’ salaries for as long as they remain with the organization. Hence, the increases are permanent and their values are compounded over time as additional increases are granted.
-One alternative to base pay increases is the use of lump-sum payments. Lump-sum payments are one-time payments made in lieu of traditional base pay increases and typically are delivered annually via the merit pay program.
Factors Affecting the Success of Merit Pay
Factors Affecting the Success of Merit Pay
Managerial factors:
- Executive support for the increases
- Managerial capabilities in planning and appraisal
- Supervisor / subordinate trust levels
- Managerial fortitude
Organizational factors:
- Cost of measuring performance
- Competitiveness of pay structures
- Width of pay ranges
- Equitable internal-pay relationship among jobs
- Organization’s pay-performance linkage
- Organizational culture
- Effective communication
Individual employee factors:
- Measurable differences in performance
- Performance appraisal
- Employee belief in fairness of appraisals and increases
Considerations in the Amount of Increase
Considerations in the Amount of Increase
Current pay level / position in range
-Where is the employee’s pay in the current range (first quartile, second, third, etc.)?
Performance rating
-How well is the employee performing?
Merit increase guidelines
-What form of merit guidelines does the organization follow?
Increase history
-What has the employee received historically as an increase?
Performance improvement
-Has the employees performance improved since last merit increase?
Scarcity of particular skills
-Is the employee considered a “critical talent” or has a “hot skill?”
Individual potential
-What is the individual potential for this employee?
Many “pay-for-performance” organizations say they consider only current pay, performance and merit increase guidelines. However, they may informally consider other factors. Does the performance message get diluted when supervisors and managers take other items like potential into consideration?
The Base Pay Investment
The Base Pay Investment
One of the decisions that must be made in the development of a merit pay system is whether to link base pay to performance and timing. Most organizations continue to link base pay with performance over time. As a result, it is worthwhile to examine the criteria that may be used to differentiate pay levels under a performance-based pay approach.
Career stages: Pay levels within the range typically vary depending on an individual’s career stage. Organizational expectations at the differing career stages need to be identified. An example of career stages positioned within a pay grade is summarized on the graphic.
- New to role (does not fully meet standards) – learning; not yet performing full scope of job requirements.
- Emerging (meets standards) – deep into learning curve; developing competencies; productivity gaining; continuing to require some direction
- Established (exceeds standards) – fully functioning in role; demonstrating desired competencies and behaviors; productive; using sound judgment; mastering functions, serving as a mentor
- Expert (consistently outstanding) – mastering the job function; performing complex responsibilities; credible reputation; unique talent; highly productive; may be serving in a leadership role; consistently exceeds standards over an extended period of time.
Evolution of the employee role – Organizations “invest” in the potential of new employees in the hope that over time they will develop into valuable assets.
Position in Range – Pay Progression within Range
Position in Range – Pay Progression within Range
Another way to view the base pay investment and advancement through career stages is to add the factor of time to achieve a particular range penetration. Note that in this system (depicted on the slide) range penetration is truncated depending on performance. It is possible to be rated “Meets Standards” for many years and not reach the maximum.
There are two key decisions:
- How far should a particular performance level take an employee into the range?
- How long should it take?
Range Penetration
Range Penetration
Another way to calculate where an employee is positioned in the range is to calculate range penetration.
Formula:
Pay Rate - Minimum / Maximum - Minimum
Examples: Pay rates of 2.850 and 2,725 in the following salary range:
Maximum = 3.100
Midpoint = 2,850
Minimum = 2,600
(2850-2600)/(3100-2600) = 250/500 = 50%
(2725-2600)/(3100/2600) = 125/500 = 25%
Range penetration does not focus on the middle or midpoint of range.
Compa-Ratio Calculations
A useful concept relative to pay ranges, position in range and salary increase budgets is compa-ratio. Compa-ratio is another way of calculating where an employee is positioned in the range. It is the ratio of actual pay to structure midpoint, expressed as a percentage. The term can also be used to indicate the ratio of actual pay to competitive pay, although usually it is referred to as the market index.
Compa-ratio usually is, but not always, compared to 100.
Formulas:
Salary / Midpoint = Individual Compa-ratio (actual to structure)
Weighted Avg Salary / Midpoint = Unit/Organizational Compa-ratio (actual to structure)
Weighted Avg Salary / Weighted Market Avg. = Market Index (actual to market)
Control Point
Control Point
Another way to determine where an employee is positioned in the range is to calculate the control point. The control point is the point within a given job’s pay range or broadband that is targeted for fully qualified, satisfactorily performing job incumbents. It can also be determined for multiple jobs:
- In a traditional salary structure, the control point is most commonly the midpoint of the range, but variable control points higher or lower than the midpoint may be used to respond to the market.
- For broadbands, there are often many control points within one broadband.
To monitor employee pay against control points, most companies divide actual employee pay by the control point (similar to the calculation of a compa-ratio).
Example of Control Point – As Applied to Broadbanding
Market rates for three senior level engineer jobs differ. The company’s policy is to set control points for each job to monitor individual pay against competitive market rates.