M&A Flashcards

1
Q

Synergistic benefits from a firms own resources

A

Carpon & Pistre

  • It’s the synergies between a firms own resources and another that will determine the benefits from M&A
  • The difference between the value the first and second firms can add will determine price
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Under what conditions do relatedness result in abnormal returns for bidding firms

A

Barney (1988)

  • ## An acquiring firms will only benefit if they have private and uniquely valuable synergistic cashflows
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 main motivations for acquisition

A

Hayward & Hambrick (1997)

  • There is an acquisition premium as a result of managerial hubris, they found using a sample of 106 firms
  • Three main motivations for acquisition:
    1) Poor target company management
    2) Synergies
    3) Hubris
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Relatedness is assumed

A

Jemison & Sitkin

  • It is often assumed that relatedness is enough for a good M&A, and this undermines the effort that is reuired to synergise the assets of the firms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Porter study

A

He studies 33 large US corporations, and found:

  • 60% of acquisitions in new fields
  • divestment rate for unrelated acquisitions was 75%
  • M&A to diversify DOESN”T MAKE SENSE, because investors can diversify at a much lower cost.

Benefits of M&A:

  • Portfolio management
  • Restructuring
  • Transferring skills
  • Sharing Activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

EXAMPLE OF HUBRIS

A

Berglas (2014)

Kenneth Lew, former CEO of Enron

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

M&A as a capability

A

Trichterborn et al.

  • They advise for the creation of a separate business unit in order to foster an environment that will develop M&A expertise.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Empirical Evidence

A

Andrade et al.

  • Mergers: Based on 4250 mergers between 1973 and 2000, there is a 38% premium paid on pre merger price.
  • Acquisition: The share price of the acquiring firm increases by 1%, whilst the share price of the acquired firm increases by 16%

Moeller et al.

  • Acquiring firms shareholders lost 12c per dollar spend on acquisition.
    Though this came as a result of a few very poorly performing firms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

spread of a new idea (4 elements)

A

Rodgers

1) Innovation itself
2) Communication channels
3) Time
4) Social systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly