Lumbar Spine and Pelvis Flashcards
Observe muscles surrounding lumbar spine (longissimus, iliocostalis, and multifidus).
Which muscle is most developed in the lower lumbar region?
How do these muscles contribute to stability in the lumbar spine?
- Multifidus is the most developed in the LOWER lumbar region. Smaller moment arm = primary stabilizer of L/S
- Muscles provide stability and mobility to the L/S. Because of the difference in moment arm, multifidus (smaller moment arm) is throught to be the primary stabilizer of the L/S, while the Erector Spinae (larger moment arm) are thought to be the primary movers of the spine.
- Due to different attachment sites, these mm will contribute to different movements.
Yo (160 cm, 60 N) is picking up a pen off the ground by bending her lumbar spine and hips. Estimate the force needed by the lumbar extensor mm to accomplish this task.
- The interal torque produced by the extensor mm must be equal and opposite to the torque produced by the external force. So, equation is (extensor mm force)*(moment arm of extensor) = (weight of upper trunk)*(moment arm upper trunk).
- Weight of upper trunk is about 50% total body weight (60N/2=30N) and to simplify example, we’ll assume that its mass is midway up the trunk. Since the length of the upper trunk is about 50% of total BH, lever arm of upper trunk will be 25% of BH (164/4 cm).
- Moment arm of back extensor is about 5 cm
- Equation is now: (external mm force)*(5 cm) = (60/2)*(164/4).
- Extensor mm force = 240 N.
- Large mm force needed is primarily due to small lever arm of the mm when compared to lever of external force.
- Large mm force acting on spine will dramatically increase posteriro shear and compression forces on the spine and disc.
Compare and contrast the “stoop” and “squat” lifting techniques.
-
Stoop Lift
- Pros: Less demand on knees
- Cons: Creates large force possibly damaging compression and shear to discs
- Long external moment arm (thus increased demand on lumbar extensors)
-
Squat Lift
- Pros: Reduced external moment arm of load/trunk (thus diminished extensor torque demands on lumbar extensors)
- Cons: Creates greater demand on quadriceps to produce extensor torque; Large imposed force on tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints
Describe the AOR for sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane motion of the lumbar spine.
- Sagittal: ML axis - posterior portion of IV disc
- Frontal: AP axis - contralateral side of disc
- Transverse: Longitudional Axis - center of disc
What are the attachments of the psoas and iliacus muscle?
-
Psoas
- Superficial layer: Lateral surfaces of T12 vertebral bodies, L1-L4 vertebral bodies and associated IV discs
- –> Lesser Trochanter
- Deep layer: transverse processes of L1-L5 vertebrae
- —> Lesser trochanter
- Superficial layer: Lateral surfaces of T12 vertebral bodies, L1-L4 vertebral bodies and associated IV discs
-
Iliacus: Iliac crest, iliac fossa
- —> Tendon of psoas and lesser trochanter
Describe the line of pull (if any) of the psoas and iliacus on the lumbar spine
- Psoas: Anterior and inferior (pulling into anterior tilt -> extension/lordosis and inferior)
- Iliacus: no direct attachment to L/S and therefore no action at L/S
Does shortening of the iliacus or psoas have an effect on posture of the lumbar spine?
- Yes, if these mm are shortened, there wil be an increased lumbar lordosis (increased extension) as well as increased anterior pelvic tilt and decreased hip extension)
- Psoas has an anterior-inferior pull on the L/S. With a stable pelvis, the psoas will technically flex the L/S; however, its attachments are both anterior and posterior to the AOR.
- Iliacus will cause anterior pelvic tilt, which will resut in an increased lordosis (extension) due to lumbopelvic rhythm.
- If help flexors are shortened, they will increase lordosis.
What occurs at the different spinal levels when a PA motion to L3-L5/S1 is given?
- PA motion to the SP produces extension generally at that level and the levels above/below from L3-L5/S1.
- PA to L1 and L2, extension is observed at L1-L3/4, while relative flexion observed at L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels.
What happens to L3/L4 and L4/L5 when a PA force is applied to SP of L3?
What happens to L2/L3 when a PA force is applied to SP of L3?
- When a PA force is applied to the SP of L3, the caudal facet of L3 approximate to cranial facets of L4 and impose motion on the L4 vertebra.
- In addition to causing extension, force from L3 facets on L4 likely glides the L4 vertebra anteriorly, causing subsequent approximation at the L4/L5 segment via a similar mechanism to that at L3/L4.
- At L2-L3 segment, when a PA force applied to L3 SP, force will glide the superior facets of L3 away from inferior facets of L2, separating the L2-L3 facet joint surfaces.
- This separation would cause the facet joint capsule to become taut, pulling the caudal facet of L2 vertebra anteriorly, causing it to extend in relation to L3.
What happens to L1/L2, L2/L3 when a PA force is applied to L1 and L2 SP?
What happens to L4/L5 and L5/S1 when a PA force is applied to L1 and L2 SP?
- When a PA force is applied to L1 and L2 SP, force on L1 and L2 result in segmental extension at targeted segment and other upper two segments.
- L2/L3 and L3/L4 for PA pressure at L1
- L1/L2, and L3/L4 for PA pressure at L2
- Remaining caudal segments (L4/L5, L5/S1 were observed to flex.
- Prevailing flexion response was most likely to related to fixed mass of pelvis (serving as a coutnerweight to PA force application at L1 and L2.
General arthrokinematics for flexion at lumbar spine?
Inferior facets of superior segment glide superior and anterior on superior facets of inferior segment.
General arthrokinematics for extension at lumbar spine?
Inferior facets of superior segment glide down and approximate the superior facets of the inferior segment.
General arthrokinematics for rotation at lumbar spine?
- Ipsilateral facet gaps
- Contralateral facet approximated
- Rotation: contralateral facet closes
General arthrokinematics for sidebending at lumbar spine?
- Ipsilateral facets approximated/glide down
- Contralateral facets glide up/gap
- Side bend: Ipsilateral facet closes
Clinical Examples of Arthrokinematics:
- If a patient forward bends and deviates to same side what side has suggested capsular tightness? Why?
- If a patient is unable to rotate in one direction, which side is hypomobile and will not allow gapping?
- If a patient is unable to extend, what does it suggest that the facets are unable to do?
- In the extension position, if a patient can only side bend to the right with limited ROM, it may suggest that which facet is hypomobile?
- If a patient forward bends and deviates to the same side, it suggests capsular tightness on side of deviation; facet is unable to fully glide superior/anterior and open
- If a patient is unable to rotate in one direction, hypmobile facet joint on same sie, and will not allow gapping on that side (Rotation limited by ipsilateral hypmobile facet not allowing gapping)
- If a patient is unable to extend, it suggests inability of facets to downglide.
- In the extension position, if a patient can only side bend to the right with limited motion, it may suggest that the left facet is hypomobile (Sidebend limited by contralateral hypomobile facet not allowing gapping)