LTM: Encoding, Consolidation, and Retrieval Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

encoding

A

Acquiring information and transforming it into memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

retrieval

A

transferring information from LTM to working memory, our failures of memory are failures to retrieve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

maintenance rehearsal

A

using meanings and connections to help transfer information to LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

shallow processing

A

little attention to meaning, focus on physical features, poor memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

deep processing

A

close attention to meaning, and elaborative rehearsal that focuses on an item’s meaning and its relationship to something else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Craik and Tulvings experiment

A

According to levels of processing theory, memory depends on the depth of processing that an item receives. Depth of processing distinguishes between shallow processing and deep processing. The three types of questions were designed to create different levels of processing: (1) physical features 5 shallow processing; (2) rhyming 5 deeper processing; (3) fill in the blanks 5 deepest processing. Results show deeper processing is associated with better memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

visual imagery

A

generating images in your head to connect works visually. People who created images remembered more then twice as many words as the participants who just repeated the word pairs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

self-reference effect

A

Memory is better if you are asked to relate a word to yourself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

generation effect

A

generating material for yourself, rather than passively receiving it, enhances learning and retention. Participants who generated the second word of each pair were able to reproduce 28% more than participants who just read the word pairs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

organizing to-be-remembered information

A

people remember words in a particular category that serves as a retrieval cue – a word that helps a person remember information stored in memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

relating words to survival value

A

memory was shaped to increase the ability to survive, especially in situations experienced by our ancestors, who were faced with basic survival challenges like finding food and evading predators.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

retrieval practice

A

demonstrated by Karpicke and Roediger, testing memory to elaborate on material.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recognition vs. recall

A

recognition is different from recall because in recall the person must produce the item to be recalled. A recall test would be like filling in blanks, while a recognition test would be multiple choice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

cued recall

A

most of our failures of memory are failures to retrieve, cue presented to aid retrieval, increased performance over free call, retrieval cues most effective when created by the person who uses them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

recognition

A

identification of a stimulus that was encountered earlier, present stimulus during a study period and later to present the same stimulus along with others that were not presented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

free recall

A

a participant is asked to recall stimuli, used in serial position curve.

17
Q

serial recall

A

participants recall a list of items in a specific order it was presented.

18
Q

Bransford and Johnson experiment

A

the importance of organization, comprehension of material.
Presented difficult-to-comprehend information:
- Experiment group 1 saw picture that helped explain the information before reading it.
- Experiment group 2 saw picture after reading the passage.
- Control group did not see the picture.
Results: Group 1 outperformed the others because having a mental framework of comprehension aided memory encoding and retrieval.

19
Q

Karpicke and Reodiger word pair experiment

A
  • Group 1 – studied and tested all words/all sessions.
  • Group 2 – studied only words missed in previous tests; tested on all words.
  • Group 3 – studied all words; tested on words missed in previous test.
    Results: Group 3 had a later performance then 1 and 2, which shows testing memory retrieval can improve memory.
20
Q

encoding specificity

A

we learn information together with its context.

21
Q

Baddeley’s diving experiment

A

best recall occurred when encoding and retrieval occurred in the same location.

22
Q

state-dependent learning

A

learning is associated with a particular internal state, better memory if person’s mood at encoding matches mood during retrieval.

23
Q

transfer-appropriate processing

A

memory task results improve if the type of processing used during encoding is the same as the type used during retrieval. Morris and coworkers.

24
Q

Hebb experiment

A

learning and memory represented in the brain by physiological changes at the synapse, neural record of experience.

25
Q

long-term potentiation

A

enhanced firing neurons after repeated stimulation, structural changes, and enhanced responding.

26
Q

standard model of consolidation

A

Systems consolidation, after encoding, activity of hippocampus fades with time.

27
Q

multiple trace model of consolidation

A

hippocampus activity is activated during retrieval of both recent remote memories; response of the hippocampus can change over time.

28
Q

Difference between standard and multiple trace model of consolidation

A

The standard model shows that connections between the hippocampus and the cortex are initially strong and inter-cortical connections are weak. As time passes inter-cortical connections strengthen and hippocampus-cortical connections remain.

29
Q

consolidation

A

transforms new memories from fragile state to more permanent state, enhanced during sleep.

30
Q

synaptic consolidation

A

rapid, occurs at synapses.

31
Q

systems consolidation

A

gradual, reorganization of neural circuits.

32
Q

Muller and Pilzecker experiment

A

participants either learned first list then a second list, or there was a 6-minute delay between lists. Those who delayed had better recall when memory was tested later.

33
Q

reconsolidation

A

Retrieved memories become more fragile and are consolidated again.

34
Q

Hupbach experiment

A

human reconsolidation experiment

35
Q

Brunet’s PTSD experiment

A

PTSD causes severe emotional responses to traumatic memories. Participants reactivated traumatic memory, a drug was administered to block amygdala stress receptors during reconsolidation of memory, later reactivation of same memory showed lower stress response.