LT and marxism in relation to social sin Flashcards
LT context
Liberation theology grew in popularity at a time when an under-developed Latin America (where people lived in poverty ) was a key battleground in the Cold War.
LT
Latin America raised the question: would it stick with capitalism or choose socialism
LT main idea
Liberation theology drew on the idea that the purpose of development isn’t to increase wealth but to increase human well-being.
marxism
If workers are alienated and exploited, there’s injustice. The structures of sin that support industrialisation become part of the organisational structure of society (schools, government) and injustice becomes institutionalised
Gutierrez 1
Gutierrez mentions Marx’s theories and cautioned against endorsing every aspect of marxism, but believed that people of Latin America had a deep-rooted desire for liberation from the burdens of capitalism
Gutierrez 2
Gutierrez called for the Church to stand with those movements
Latin American church
Being Christian requires a person to be political. Gutierrez argued that it’s the responsibility of the Latin American Church to denounce every dehumanising situation that is contrary to brotherhood, justice and liberty
Church
The Church must be a voice against alienation and exploitation, and right action orthopraxy should come before right belief orthodoxy.
Class struggle
The class struggle is a fact and neutrality in this matter is impossible.
Structural sin
To reject the class struggle is to legitimise the existing system and work as part of it. The current system embraces structural inequality and this creates structural sin.
LT uses Marx?
Liberation theologians are clear that liberation theology isn’t marxist but uses Marx’s analysis of society
LT use of Marx
Liberation theology freely borrows from Marxism certain methodological pointers that have proved fruitful in understanding the world of the oppressed” (Leonardo and Clodovis Boff)
LT conclusion
Liberation theology concludes that capitalism has failed to satisfy the basic needs of the poor and, although socialism may not be perfect, the socialist ideal is better than the capitalist ideal.