LT (1) Capital Budgeting Flashcards
What is corporate finance?
Corporate finance is the study of how corporations make financial decisions.
A corporation is a legal entity (i.e. a legal ‘person’) owned by, but legally distinct from its owners (‘shareholders’). It is typically characterised by:
Limited liability for its shareholders
Separation of ownership and control
Goal of the firm: maximise shareholder wealth.
What is capital budgeting?
A key task of managers is to allocate capital between projects. Stand-alone: Is Project A better than doing nothing? Mutually exclusive: Is Project A better than Project B?
Our focus will be on the financial tools for valuation. These tools attach numerical values to projects to aid comparison and assist in the decision-making process.
What is the opportunity cost of capital?
Financial managers should always consider the opportunity cost of investing in a project.
The alternative to investing is paying a dividend to shareholders and then the shareholders can invest for themselves
What is the net present value formula?
How do you use it? (What rules do you need to keep in mind.)
NPV0 =CF0+E(CF1)/(1+r)+ E(CF2)/(1+r)^2 +……
r is the opportunity cost of capital
(riskier investments, higher r)
NPV converts a project’s future cash flows into comparable quantities that can simply be summed. The NPV is the $ contribution of the project to firm value in today’s money.
Accept project if NPV > 0.
To calculate NPV, we need to forecast a project’s expected after-tax free cash flows (FCF). FCFs are the cash flows ‘left over’ to distribute to investors after all operating expenses and capital expenditures have been made.
Rules:
Only cash flows are relevant!
Estimate cash flows on an incremental basis
Include opportunity costs Ignore sunk costs
Include all externalities
Treat inflation consistently
What are the advantadges of using NPV? (3)
1 )Precise. NPV accounts for:
Time value of money
Compensation for bearing risk
2) Convenient: present values are additive NPV(A+B) = NPV(A)+NPV(B)
Assuming Projects A and B are independent
NPV based on cash flows not accounting earnings.
What are the alternativative valuation methods that compete with NPV for capital budegting? (3)
1) Book rate of return
2) Payback period
3) Internal rate of return
How do you use the book rate of return?
Book rate of return = Book Income/Book Assets
Average income divided by average book value over project life.
Decision rule: Accept if book rate of return is ‘high enough’.
Rarely used to make decisions.
What are the issues with using the book rate of return as a valuation method?
1) The components reflect tax and accounting figures and are not market values or cash flows (open to manipulation)
2) Time value of money is ignored
3) Only considers averages, and risk is ignored
How do you use the payback period valuation method?
Payback Period: the number of years it takes before the cumulative forecasted cash flows of a project equals the initial outlay.
Decision rule: Accept projects that “payback” within a desired time frame.
What are the issues with using the payback period as a valuation method?
Ignores all cash-flows after the payback period
Ignores time value of money and risk, although this can be remedied by discounting cash flows before calculating the payback period (called ’discounted payback’)
Decision rule is arbitrary
Biased against long term projects
What is the internal rate of return valuation method?
Accept investment opportunities offering internal rates of return that are higher than the opportunity cost of capital.
IRR > cost of capital
When the cost of capital = expected return on investment, NPV = 0
The IRR is the discount rate that makes NPV = 0
This opportunity cost of capital is also called the project’s
hurdle rate
NPV0 = 0 = CF0+ E(CF1)/(1+IRR) + E(CF2)/(1+IRR)^2 + E(CF3)/(1+IRR)^3 +…
The quadratic formula may have to be used to find out the irr, (setting x= 1/1+IRR) what is the formula for the quadratic formula?
x=-b(+ or -) (b^2-4ac)^1/2 / 2a
What are the Pitfalls of using the IRR? (4)
Blindly applying the IRR rule can lead to incorrect decisions (i.e. accepting negative NPV projects).
We need to be wary of:
1) Lending vs. borrowing
Two streams of cash-flows, both same in magnitude but opposite in sign, will have the same IRR.
For financing projects (Borrowing ie. positive cash flow at time = o), IRR rule needs to be reversed: only accept if IRR < cost of capital.
2) Multiple IRRs
Certain cash flows streams can generate NPV = 0 at two (or more) different discount rates.
This can happen when future cash flows change sign more than once. (AS MANY RATES OF RETURN AS THERE ARE IN CHANGES OF SIGN )
3) No IRR
It is possible to have no IRR and a positive NPV, or no IRR and a negative NPV.
These are projects that should always be accepted or rejected, respectively.
4) Mutually exclusive projects
Decision rule: pick the project with the highest IRR.
Don’t compare apples to oranges: the projects being compared should be in the same risk-class (i.e. same cost of capital)
IRR doesn’t take into account differing levels of risk
The IRR rule can sometimes result in incorrect decisions when projects differ in their scale and/or the timing of their cash flows.
(IRR is only a function of return, but investors prefer wealth over the return.)
Where cash flows arrive relatively earlier, project is favoured by IRR, but not necessarily better at the cost of capital.
How can the issues that arise from using the IRR valuation method for mutually exclusive projects be remedied?
Calculating the IRR of the incremental cashflows that would result from taking one project instead of the other provides a potential remedy when comparing mutually exclusive projects.
KEY: MAKE THE INCREMENTAL CASH FLOWS LOOK LIKE AN INVESTMENT PROJECT (-ve cash flow initially) (Rather than financing project which would stuff up the IRR rule.)
Incremental Cash flow of investing in Project A instead of B is =A-B at each time period
If the IRR beta exceeds the cost of capital and so does the IRR of the incremental investment in A. Choose Alpha.
The incremental IRR corresponds to the cross over point between the two NPV profiles.
What is the FCF formula?
Approach: start with incremental accounting earnings and then adjust to get to free cash flows.
FCF = EBIT(1−τc )+Depreciation−∆NWC−CAPEX+Salvage
Assume it is equity financed (ie. no debt.)
where:
EBIT = Earnings before interest and taxes
NWC = Net working capital = Curr. Assets − Curr. Liab. CAPEX = Capital Expenditures (i.e. investment)
Salvage = after-tax recovery value of used productive capital τc = marginal corporate tax rate
Note: we ignore any interest expenses in the FCF calculation. Rationale: Keep investment and financing decisions separate.
Alternatively:
Since EBIT = EBITDA − Depreciation:
EBITDA = Earning before: interest, taxes, depreciation & ammortirisation
FCF = EBITDA(1−τc )+Depreciation×τc −∆NWC−CAPEX+Salvage
The term Depreciation × τc in the equation above is the tax benefit provided by depreciation, and is called the depreciation tax shield
Because depreciation is a non-cash expense that reduces a firm’s tax bill (a cash expense).