LSAT prep Flashcards

1
Q

Argument

A

Premise and conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Premise set

A

Non-contradictory premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Paradox

A

Contradictory premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Debate

A

Two speakers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CLIR

A

Controversy, Loophole, Inference, Resolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CLIR tasks

A

Debate > Controversy
Argument > Loophole
Premise Set > Inference
Paradox > Resolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Premises are…

A

Premises are the evidence. Premises support conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conclusions are…

A

Conclusions are the claim. Conclusions rely on premises.

Conclusions are the judgments the author makes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

because

A

premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

for

A

premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

since

A

premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

as

A

premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

given that

A

premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

therefore

A

conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

thus

A

conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

accordingly

A

conclusion

17
Q

hence

A

conclusion

18
Q

consequently

A

conclusion

19
Q

it follows that

A

conclusion

20
Q

so

A

conclusion

21
Q

Inference

A

Are not part of an argument. Inferences are something we come up with from a Premise Set. An Inference is a valid conclusion you design yourself, not a conclusion inside an argument.

“Avocados and gingerbread both contain nitrogen. Nitrogen is an element.”

Inference: Avocados and gingerbread have an element in common.

22
Q

Intermediate conclusion (subsidiary conclusions or sub-conclusions)

A

Fulfills the argumentative role of both premise and conclusion. It both supports the argument’s main conclusion and is supports by its premises.

Intermediate conclusion supports the main conclusion. The main conclusion is proven with the help of the intermediate conclusion.

23
Q

What is the negation of NOT NECESSARILY TRUE?

A

MUST BE TRUE

24
Q

What is the Equivalent of COULD BE TRUE?

A

NOT NECESSARILY FALSE

25
Q

What is the Negation of CANNOT BE FALSE?

A

COULD BE FALSE

26
Q

What is the Equivalent of CANNOT BE TRUE?

A

NOT NECESSARILY TRUE

27
Q

What is the Equivalent of NOT NECESSARILY TRUE?

A

COULD BE TRUE

28
Q

Sufficient Condition

A

The “if” part of the conditional is called the sufficient condition.

The sufficient condition is a door opener. It’s welcoming.

29
Q

Conditional Reasoning

A

Conditional reasoning is the art of the if/then. If one thing happens, then another thing must happen.

30
Q

Necessary Condition

A

The “then” part of the conditional is called the necessary condition.

The necessary condition slams the door that the sufficient condition opens. It is a place of certainly. It has to occur at some point if the conditional relationship is activated. You can prove things that live in the necessary condition.