LSAT Overview/Logic Flashcards
“Standardized”
The LSAT is always exactly the same: A score of X on one test means the same thing as a score of X on another (+/- margin of error of 3.5 points).
“LSAT Formulas”
Everything is consistent. For example:
Number of questions
Levels of difficulty
Topics of passages
Question types
Ways the “right” answers relate to the stimulus
Trap answer types
Definition of “conclusion”, “assumption”, “infer/imply”, “unless”, “or”, “explicit/implicit”
“If it ain’t broke…”
“…don’t fix it”
Passages have recently gotten…
Harder:
Longer passages
More technical content
More tough questions (2-3 good answers)
Raw score I’m targeting
Miss 4-6 questions total
The LSAT is NOT a test of…
“Logical reasoning”, “reading comprehension”, or “analytical reasoning”
“Credited response”
The LSAT’s term for “best answer”, and an implicit recognition that it is not necessarily objectively “right”
“LSAT thinking is…”
Precise, mechanical, literal, unimaginative, superficial, uncreative, inflexible.
“I will NEVER interpret!”
“I will ONLY match!”
“Distractors”
The LSAT term for 2nd-best answers, deliberately designed to mislead you
“Best of five” principle
- Good answers you have to eliminate to get to better answers
- Question with five bad answers, have to pick the “least worst”
“Precision principle”
and its three exceptions
LSAT is primarily a test of your ability to “match,” with dictionary-definition precision, the meaning of words and phrases in the answers with equivalent words and phrases in the stimulus
Can’t know which words and phrases will be crucial until you get to the answers, but may get better at predicting which words will turn out to be crucial
Also need precision on grammatical features, e.g. tense of verb and singular/plural of nouns
Exception 1: LSAT definitions ("imply", "infer", "or", "unless", "conclusion", "assumption", "flaw") ALWAYS trump real world definitions.
Exception 2: (applies primarily to Args)
a. Recognize errors in reasoning when you see them (evaluate/manipulate, flaw, strengthener/weakener, parallel flaw, relevance questions)
b. Impart a limited, judicious amount of common sense in assessing the statistical probability of a conclusion’s being true, given the evidence
Exception 3:
Colloquialisms, idioms, irony, sarcasm
Predicting
Working the problem “forwards”
Many, though far from all, answers in Args and Passages are highly predictable, and doing so works better for most people most of the time
“Bad attitude”
Answers are guilty until proven innocent
Look for reasons to eliminate each answer, not support it
3 basic ways to avoid “distractors”
- Predict the answer
- Have a “bad” attitude
- Know the “distractor families”
3 major “distractor” families
- Misquotes
- Not in arg or passage
- Comes from wrong place in stimulus
“Misquote”
A precision mismatch or imperfect paraphrase; any answer that has even just one word that is further from a dictionary-perfect match to the stimulus content than some other answer
Most frequent distractor family in Args and Passages
“Not in the argument or passage”
Answers that are not in the stimulus at all, but come from real-world associations
Second most frequent distractor family in Args; Third most frequent in Passages
“Wrong part of the argument”
Answers that come from the wrong part of the argument or wrong place in the passage
Third most frequent distractor family in Args; Second most frequent in Passages
Validity/Credibility
Correct evidence-conclusion relationship; evidence logically and/or reasonably leads to the conclusion
“Most LSAT arguments are…”
Flawed. And most LSAT arguments are more flawed than you initially think.
“Assume flawed until proven valid.”
Some arguments are actually valid, almost always in the “parallel reasoning” or “similar arguments” questions