Loss Of Control Flashcards

1
Q

Which section of the coroners and justice act

A

S54 and 55 2009/2010

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which sections provides a definition of the defence

A

S54 (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many elements and name them and their section numbers

A

Was there a loss of control s54 (1) a
Was there a qualifying trigger s 54(1) b
Would the normal persona have acted in the same or a similar way s55 (1) c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What defence does it replace

A

Provocation abolished by s56(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does loss of control differ from provocation

A

Narrower as provocation was too lenient on those who killed out of anger and too sever on those who killed out of fear of violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which court of appeal cases recognised that the new defence was harder to access than provocation

A

Clinton 2012 and Dawes 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Dawes indicate

A

Judge decides if the defence of loss of control is available based on evidence s54 (6) if it is the jury decides if d had a loss of control leading to the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can provocation be applied

A

Cases pre October 2010

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does L of C make is easier for domestic violence victims

A

Can establish manslaughter but harder for those who killed because of marital infidelity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does L of C allow slow burn

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How to establish a defence of L of C

A

Determine AR and MR for murder then apply any relevant defence in this case L of C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What will a successful defence of L of C reduce the murder charge to

A

Voluntary manslaughter s54 (7)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What burden of proof is required for L of C

A

Prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that there was no loss of control s54 (5)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Any L of C need not be sudden but is a question for the jury section number and cases

A

S54 (2) and (4)
Jewell, workman, barnesdale-Queane
C of a dismissed all due to no l of c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What must the l of c (in terms of time)

A

Temporary (Clinton) if it were permanent this would amount to insanity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Dawes say in terms of what is loss of control

A

Different individuals in different situations do no my react identically not respond immediately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Length of time between tigger and killing need not be short know as

A

Cooling off period and slow burn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is slow burn

A

Cumulative effect providing the last incident caused a temporary loss of self control relevant in battered wives cases (ahluwalia)

19
Q

A considered desire for revenge s 54(4) would negate the defence what did Clinton say

A

The greater the level of deliberation the less likely it will be that the killing followed a true loss of self control

20
Q

Loss of control is statutory under which act

A

Coroners and justice act 2009

21
Q

Which section defines what a trigger is

A

S54 (1) b

22
Q

What is the first trigger and section ip umber

A

S55 (3) a loss of control attributable to d’s fear of serious violence from v against d or another

23
Q

Where else can the fear of violence come from

A

Another identified person but it can’t be a general fear of violence e.g Pearson pre coroners and justice act fear of violence against an identified person

24
Q

What is trigger 2 and its section number

A

S55 (4) a loss of control attributable to things said or done this must constitute a circumstance of an extremely grave character that caused d to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged

25
Q

Which case said that the justifiable sense of being seriously wrong is objective

A

Clinton

26
Q

Who confirmed that must be looked at objectively

A

Dawes

27
Q

Case facts of Dawes

A

Went to estranged wife’s house and found her asleep with v. D woke v up and punched him in face with a bottle. According to d v took bottle off and attacked him.
D grabbed knife from kitchen and stabbed d in the neck

28
Q

Neither trigger is met is d incited a thing said or done for proving an excuse to use violence section case

A

S55 (6) a and b

Dawes

29
Q

Section for when trigger 2 is not met if the things said or done constituted sexual infidelity

A

S55 (6) c

30
Q

What does Clinton say in terms of sexual infidelity

A

Is not subject to a blank exclusion of it forms part of the context then it can be considered

31
Q

Case facts of Clinton

A

D bludgeoned and straggled wife to death. She told d she was having an affair in detail. V was aware he was looking at sucked websites and told him he didn’t have the courage and told him he could take the children

32
Q

A loss of control is attributable to a combination of both triggers section numbers

A

S55 (5)

33
Q

Case where no loss of control

A

Zebedee
D charged with the murder of 94 year old father who had alzheimers and doubly incontinent. D punched and strangled to death as claimed v had soiled himself in the night and d had cleaned him up for him to do it again

34
Q

What is the normal person test

A

S54 (1) c
A person of d gender and age with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint in the circumstances of d might react in a similar way

35
Q

What are the two elements of a normal person test

A

Standard of self control

Gravity of provocation

36
Q

Which characterises taken into account for standard of self control

A

Gender and age confirmed in ddp v camplin

37
Q

What is a normal degree of self control and what is it not

A

Irrational prejudices excluded and bad tempered is excluded

38
Q

Which case says in relation to the normal person test intoxication is irrelevant

A

Asmelash

39
Q

Section number of gravity of provocation

A

In the circumstance of d s54 (3)

40
Q

What us galea city of provocation

A

The Normal person placed in the circumstances of d

41
Q

Case for gravity of provocation

A

Hill: sexually abused as a child. V tried to sexual assault d lost control and killed

42
Q

What is might react in a similar way

A

If jury decided that the normal person of same gender and age would have lost self control but might not have reacted in a similar way the defence is negated

43
Q

Case for reacting in a similar way

A

Van dongen