loss of control Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What section and act does the defence of ‘Loss of control’ come under?

A

S54 Coroners and Justice Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the first thing that must be established in LoC?

A

It must be shown that D lost control and wasn’t exercising proper judgement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the principle in R v Jewell?

A

There must be sufficient evidence that D lost control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which case stated that loss of control doesn’t need to be sudden as people act differently to provoking behaviour, however, the longer the delay, the less likely it will be loss of control?

A

R v Dawes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the second thing that needs to be established under LoC?

A

That there was a qualifying trigger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the fear trigger?

A

Fear of serious violence against D or an identified individual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the principle in R v Lodge?

A

Fear of violence against D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case stated fear of violence on another person can amount to a qualifying trigger?

A

R v Ward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case stated that LOC (fear of violence) does not apply where D incited the violence?

A

R v Dawes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the anger trigger?

A

Things said or done which constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character and caused D to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is it tested to see if the circumstances are of an extremely grave character and whether D had a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged?

A

Judged objectively, the things said or done are… and the reasonable man would constitute these as circumstances of an extremely grave character because…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the principle under R v Clinton?

A

Sexual infidelity is not a trigger where it is the only reason for the killing, but can be considered alongside other things under circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is a history of abuse relevant?

A

Yes, a history of abuse would affect the way D, and a reasonable man in D’s circumstances would react, and so should be taken into account (Hill)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is voluntary intoxication relevant?

A

No, this is not considered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can D argue they were “hot headed”

A

No, hot tempered cannot be taken into account (Mohammed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Did LOC succeed in the R v Hatter case?

A

No, a break up of a relationship will not normally constitute circumstance of an extremely grave character

17
Q

Did LOC succeed in the R v Bowyer case?

A

No, no justifiable sense of being seriously wronged as D was committing a burglary at the time of the offence.

18
Q

What is the third thing that needs to be established in LOC?

A

s54 whether “ a person of D’s sex and age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint and in the circumstances of D, might have reacted in the same or similar way”

19
Q

Is revenge allowed?

A

s55(4) the defence will fail if motivated by a ‘considered desire for revenge’ (Baille).