Lorenz: Animal Studies Flashcards
In what year did Lorenz’s study take place?
1935
What was the aim of Lorenz’s experiment?
To examine the phenomenon of imprinting in non-human animals
What is imprinting?
Where the offspring follows and forms an attachment bond to the first large moving object they see after birth
What was the method of Lorenz’s experiment?
- Lorenz randomly divided greylag goose eggs into 2 batches
- The control group was hatched naturally by the mother, but the experimental group were placed in an incubator, where Lorenz was the first large moving object they saw
- He marked the goslings so he knew what condition they were in and then the box they were in was taken away
- Their behaviours were then recorded
What were the results of Lorenz’s study?
- He found that naturally hatched goslings followed their mother and the incubator hatched goslings followed Lorenz (straight after birth)
- Imprinting only occurred within a critical time period of 4-25 hours
- This relationship proved to be irreversible
What was the conclusions of Lorenz’s study?
- The results suggest that imprinting is a form of attachment that’s exhibited by birds that typically leave the nest early
- They imprint on to the first large moving object they see after birth
Lorenz: Research support (AO3)
P: One strength of Lorenz’s research comes from later research support.
E: Guiton (1966) replicated the findings of Lorenz with leghorn chickens. He found that these chickens, exposed to yellow rubber gloves for feeding, became imprinted on the gloves.
E: This shows that young animals are not born with a predisposition to imprint to a specific type of object, but develop their imprinting with any moving object within a critical window of development.
L: This supports the findings of Lorenz within a different species and suggests that behaviours aren’t innate, but learnt.
Lorenz: Criticism of imprinting (AO3)
P: One criticism of Lorenz’s research is his concept of ‘imprinting’.
E: The original concept of imprinting is that an image is stamped irreversibly on the nervous system. However, it is now believed that imprinting is more flexible.
E: Guiton (1966) found also that he could reverse the imprinting of rubber gloves on chickens. They had originally tried to mate with a rubber glove, but when placed back with their own specie that engaged in normal sexual activity.
L: This shows that imprinting is no different from other types of learning and the effects are irreversible, unlike Lorenz’s original proposal.