Long And Short T,erm Memory Flashcards
What is short-term memory?
Short-term memory stores and allows recall of information for a period of several seconds up to 30 seconds without rehearsal. Its capacity is very limited.
What is long-term memory?
Stores and enables us to recall of information from the more distant past. Its capacity is unlimited and duration is potentially a lifetime.
What are the three different ways, short-term and long-term are different
Duration capacity and coding
What is duration?
A measure of how long information can be stored for or how long it lasts.
Describe a study for the duration of short-term memory
Peterson and Peterson (1959)
1) Participants (24 undergraduate students) were presented with a consonant trigram (3 random consonants) e.g. ZFB
2) They were then asked to count backwards in threes to stop them repeating/rehearsing the consonant trigram.
3) After intervals of either 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds, participants had to stop counting and repeat the trigram.
4) This was repeated using different trigrams
What were the results and conclusion of Peterson and Peterson study?
Results: Participants could remember about 90% of trigrams after 3 seconds, 20% after 9 seconds, and less than 10% when there was 18 second interval.
Conclusion: Information decays (disappears) very quickly when you can’t rehearse it. The maximum STM duration is about 18 seconds.
Strength of Peterson and Peterson study
- A strength of Peterson and Peterson’s study is that it is a lab experiment where variables can be tightly controlled for example, how many trigrams and for how long they are presented. The procedure can also be replicated to test if results are reliable – for example the nonsense trigrams can be repeated on lots of participants over time and the duration of STM can be tested to see if it has changed over time (i.e. gone better or worse).
Weakness of Peterson and Peterson study
- However trigrams are unrealistic things to remember. How often in life do we have to remember meaningless consonant trigrams? It can therefore be said the experiment has low ecological validity (the findings may not apply to everyday life).
- Also, the trigrams presented on earlier trials may have caused confusion or interference when participants came to remember trigrams in later trials so we are not sure whether the results gained from the participants were due to them forgetting the trigrams or being confused due to interference– this then may question how the duration of STM was tested
What is the overall conclusion of the duration of the short term memory?
Since Peterson and Peterson’s study more research into the STM duration has been carried out. The overall conclusion is that the STM maximum duration is between 18-30 seconds without rehearsal.
Describe the study of the long-term memory duration
The duration of the LTM was also tested to see how long these memories last. Bahrick and his colleagues tested this.
Bahrick et al (1975)
They tested how well 400 American participants (aged between 17-74 years) could remember their former classmates by asking them to identify pictures, matching names to pictures and recalling names with no picture cue.
What are the results/conclusion of Bahrick study?
Results: Even after 48 years, when asked to link names and faces, accuracy was at about 70%. However, when pps were asked to free recall the names of their classmates, then accuracy after 48 years was 30%.
Conclusion: 30-50 years on, participants were still able to remember their classmates. This backs up the idea that long term memories can last a lifetime. The study also showed that individuals cannot immediately access all the information stored in their LTM- as was shown in the free recall task, however when cues (in this case photographs) are presented, then recall is much higher suggesting that cues are often needed to help retrieval.
Strength of Bahrick study
- Bahrick’s experiment has high external validity – this is because the researchers investigated meaningful material (e.g. remembering class mates) therefore this study has higher ecological validity than Peterson’s study which uses nonsense trigrams which are meaningless in the everyday world but remembering names is an everyday task so Bahrick’s study is relevant to everyday life. Furthermore this study allows us to give a better estimate of the duration of LTM due to the meaningful material used to test it.
Weakness of Bahrick study
- Because Bahrick’s study it is a natural experiment, the experimenter had less control of the IV thus it’s likely that some of the names had since been rehearsed e.g. if classmates were still in touch or had been talked about since. This would be a confounding variable, making results potentially invalid.
- It only looked at a very specific type of information- names of classmates. This type of information is particularly meaningful and regularly rehearsed. Obviously not all LTMs remain there for a lifetime.
describe the study for the capacity of the short-term memory
The capacity of the STM was measured by Jacobs.
Jacobs (1887): developed the serial digit span technique. The researcher read out 4 digits and the participant was asked to repeat it back immediately. More digits was then added until the participant could not repeat back the digit string accurately.
Results of Jacob study
Results: On average about 9 digits and 7 letters were correctly recalled. This capacity increased with age during childhood (average digit span for 8 year olds was only 6). This may because there is a gradual increase in brain capacity and /or because people develop strategies to improve their digit span, such as chunking. Digits may have been easier to recall as there are only 10 digits to remember, compared to 26 letters.