Logical Reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

Objective #1

A

Determine whether the stimulus contains and argument or if it is only a set of factual statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Because, since, for, for example, for the reason that, in that, given that, as indicated by, due to, owing to, this can be seen from, we know this by

A

Premise Indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
Thus
Therefore
Hence
Consequently
As a result
So
Accordingly
Clearly
Must be the
Shows that
Conclude that
Follows that
For this Reason
A

Conclusion Indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Primary Objective #2

A

IF the stimulus contains an argument, identify the conclusion of the argument. If the stimulus contains a fact set, examine each fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
Furtermore
Moreover
Besides
In addition to
What's more
After All
A

Additional Premise Indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
But
Yet
However
On the other hand
Admittedly 
In Contrast
Still 
Although
Whereas
Even though
Despite
A

Counter Premise Indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Primary Objective #3

A

IF the stimulus contains an argument, determine whether the argument is strong or weak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Primary Objective #4

A

Read closely and know precisely what the author said. Do not generalize! Read the fine print

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
All
Every
Most
Many
Some
Several
Few
Sole
Only
Not All
None
A

Quantity Indicators - important in every question!! Seek matches in stimulus and answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
Must
Will
Always
Not always
probably
liekly
would
not necessarily
could
rarely
never
A

Probability indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Primary Objective #5

A

Carefully read and identify the question stem. Do not assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain question types

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Family One - Must be True or Prove Family

A
1 - Must be True
2 - Main Point
3 - Point at issue
9 - Method of reasoning
10 - Flaw in reasoning
11 - parellel reasoning 

Top down. Must accept the stimulus information- prove that one answer choice must be true.
Any information in an answer choice that does not appear in the stimulus or as a combination of items in the stimulus is incorrect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Family Two - Help Family

A

4 - Assumption
5 - Justify the conclusion
6 - Strengthen/Support
7 - Resolve the paradox

Bottom up. Stimulus info is suspect. Reasoning errors present usually.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Family 3 - Hurt Family

A

8 - Weaken
Information in stimulus is suspect. Reasoning errors present. Must further weaken the argument.
Even if new information is in answers, task is still to attack argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Family 4 - Disprove

A

13 - cannot be true
Must accept stimulus information, even if contains error of reasoning, and use that info to prove one of the answer choices cannot occur.

If answer choice contains new information, then that answer choice is incorrect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Primary Objective #6

A

Prephrase after reading question stem. Take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Primary Objective #7

A

Always read each of the five answer choices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Primary Objective #8

A

Separate the answer choices into contenders and losers. After completing this process, review the contenders and decide which answer is the correct one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Primary Objective #9

A

If all five answer choices appear to be losers, return to the stimulus and reevalute the argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?
If the information above is correct, which one of the following conclusions can be properly drawn on the basis of it?
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following?
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

A

Must Be True Questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Infer means…

A

Must be true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Correct answers in must be true questions

A

Paraphrased answers - Restate stimulus in different terms. Can appear too obvious

Combination Answers - Combining two or more statements from the stimulus would make a correct answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Incorrect Answers in Must be True Questions

A

Could be true or likely to be true: very broad. Fail because must be specific

Exaggerated Answers: Broad stretch: Changing “some” to “most,” Changing “likely” to “will”

“New” Information

Reverse Answer: ‘Many people have some security’ changes to ‘Some people have many type of security’

24
Q

The Shell Game

A

An idea or concept is raised in the stimulus, and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choice, but the idea is changed enough to be incorrect but still attractive.

25
When a stimulus contains only the opinions of others..
In a must be true question you can eliminate any answer choice that makes a flat assertion without reference to those opinions.
26
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument? Which of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the journalist's argument? The main point of the argument is
Main point questions
27
Incorrect answer types of main point questions
Answers that are true but do not encapsulate the author's point Answers that repeat premises of the argument The answer is the conclusion!
28
Sufficient Condition
An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur In order for human'a brains to evolve the way the did, humans needed to intake a lot of calories. Meat has a lot of calories. So for human brain evolution, a necessary condition was "a lot of calories", the sufficient condition is "a lot of meat". Another sufficient condition would be "a shit load of snickers/candy" or anything else that has a lot of calories in it. Here you can see that eating a lot of meat is not necessary to satisfy brain evolution, as you can eat a lot of anything, but it does satisfy. However it is necessary to eat a lot of calories. \
29
Necessary Condition
An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur In order for human'a brains to evolve the way the did, humans needed to intake a lot of calories. Meat has a lot of calories. So for human brain evolution, a necessary condition was "a lot of calories", the sufficient condition is "a lot of meat". Another sufficient condition would be "a shit load of snickers/candy" or anything else that has a lot of calories in it. Here you can see that eating a lot of meat is not necessary to satisfy brain evolution, as you can eat a lot of anything, but it does satisfy. However it is necessary to eat a lot of calories.
30
``` If When Whenever Every All Any People Who In order to ```
Introduce a Sufficient Condition
31
``` Then Only Only If Must Required Unless Except Until Without ```
Introduce a necessary condition
32
Whatever term is modified by the "unless," "except," "until," or "without" becomes the _______ condition
Necessary Condition The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition
33
Unless a person studies, he or she will not receive an A+
a+ -> Study
34
There is no peace without justice
Peace -> Justice
35
No Robot can think
R-> /T No robot can think means that every single robot does not have the characteristic of being able to think. Thus, if an entity is a robot, it cannot think. None at the beginning of the sentence would operate in the exact same way.
36
When you encounter a stimulus that contains a conditional reasoning and a Must Be True question stem, immediately look for a
contrapositive or a repeat for in the answer choices
37
Double Conditional arrow
If and only if vice versa If A attends then B attends and if B attends then A attends
38
If gomez runs for president, then hong will not run for president
Double Arrow G H
39
Either A or B must occur
A/ -> B
40
For Weaken questions, focus on the
Conclusion
41
``` Weaken Attack Undermine Refute Argue against call into question cast doubt challenge damage Counter ```
Weaken the argument questions
42
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? Which of the following, if true, most undermine's the researcher's argument? Which of the following, if shown to be a realistic possibility, would undermine the argument? Which of the following, if true, would most call into question the analyst;s explanation of the price increase? Which of the following, if true, could be used by Cora to counter Bernard's rejection of her explanation? Which of the following, if true, is the strongest logical counter.. Which of the following, if true, most calls into question the claim above?
Weaken Question Stems
43
Correct answer in a weaken question would
make the author reconsider his or her position or force the author to respond
44
Common Weaken Scenarios
Incomplete information - Author fails to consider all possibilities: Flaw can be attacked with new information Improper Comparison: Author compares two or more items that are essentially different Qualified Conclusion: Limits conclusion
45
Weaken Incorrect Answer Traps
Opposite Answers - strengthen the argument instead of weakening it. Shell Game - slightly different answer Out of scope - misses the point
46
Weaken Conditional reasoning in conclusion
To weaken a conditional conclusion, attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order of the sufficient condition to occur.
47
Weaken conditional reasoning in the stimulus
find an answer that attacks the necessary condition
48
``` Caused by Because of responsible for reason for leads induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of ```
Cause and effect relationship
49
How to attack a causal conclusion
Find an alternative cause for the stated effect Show that even when the cause occurs, the effect does not occur Show that although the effect occurs, the cause did not Show that the relationship is reversed Statistcal problem
50
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? Which of the following, if true, if true, most strongly supports the statement above? does most to justify the conclusion above? Each of the following supports the claim above EXCEPT
Strengthen questions
51
How to strengthen an argument
Identify the conclusion Personalize Look for a weakness
52
Question stem uses phrase If or another sufficient condition indicator
Justify the conclusion
53
The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed? Which one of the following, if assumed, would allow the conclusion to be properly drawn? Which one of the following is an assumption that would serve to justify the conclusion above
JUSTIFY THE CONCLUSION
54
Solving Justify Questions Mechanistically
Any new element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise usually do not appear in the correct answer Elements in the premises but not conclusion usually appear in the correct answer (250)
55
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument Which one of the followng is an assumption upon which the argument depends The argument assumes which of the following The conclusion cited does not follow unless
Assumption Questions