Logical notation and Logical Equivalence Flashcards

1
Q

What does ∴ mean?

A

Therefore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How else could we write this:
P1 : ¬(A → B)
Conc : (A → B) → A

A

¬(A → B) ∴ (A → B) → A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a tautology? Give an example.

A

A sentence that is true on all rows.
E.g. A ∨ ¬A or 2 + 2 = 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a contradiction? Give an example.

A

A sentence that is false on all rows.
A & ¬A or 2 + 2 = 7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a contingent sentence?

A

A sentence that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction: There’s some row where it is T and some where it is F

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When is a collection of sentences logically consistent?

A

If there’s some row of the truth table where they’re all T
E.g. the set {A, A & B, A ∨ B}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When is a collection of sentences logically inconsistent?
Give an example

A

If there’s no row of the truth table where they’re all T
E.g. the set {A → ¬B, A & B}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When are two sentences logically equivalent?

A

If they have the same truth value on every row
E.g. ¬A ∨ B and A → B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is logical equivalence a kind of?

A

‘Equality’ relation for propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What kind of equality is logical equivalence?

A

A coarse kind of equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is logical equivalence ‘coarse’

A

It lumps together lots of sentences without making fine distinctions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the only thing logical equivalence cares about?

A

Values in truth tables, not the meaning of the sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give an example of logical equivalence with different meanings

A

Two tautologies with logical equivalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does logical equivalence useful for?

A

To check whether we’ve defined something correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What would be the logical operator for exclusive or?

A

Xor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What would be the truth table for xor?

A

T T | F
T F | T
F T | T
F F | F

17
Q

What is another way we can define xor?

A

(A ∨ B) & ¬(A & B)

18
Q

Prove that (A ∨ B) & ¬(A & B) is the same as A xor B with a truth table

A

A B |A ∨ B |A & B |¬(A & B)| (A ∨ B) & ¬(A & B)| A xor B
T T T T F F F
T F T F T T T
F T T F T T T
F F F F T F F

19
Q

What four things does the biconditional (A <=> B) say?

A
  1. A and B have the same truth value
  2. A and B are either both true or false
  3. A => B and ¬A → ¬B
  4. A → B and B → A
20
Q

What is the truth table for the biconditional?

A

A B |A ↔ B
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F T

21
Q

What are the three ways we can define the biconditional?

A
  1. (A & B) ∨ (¬A & ¬B)
  2. (A → B) & (B → A)
  3. (A → B) & (¬A → ¬B)