Logical fallacy Flashcards

1
Q

Define a logical fallacy

A

Arguments which appear logical but in reality are very flawed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ad hominem

A

An attack on the speaker, not the actual argument itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

False analogy

A

Items being compared are not related in a way as to make the comparison oversimplified and nonsensical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Straw man

A

Oversimplification of opponent’s argument to attack them (often picks the weakest, least relevant point)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Syllogism

A

“if.. and … then…” type statement, faulty use of transitive property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Circular argument

A

Restatement w/o any actual new information or reasoning being introduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Slippery slope

A

Presentation of an unrealistic/low probability horrible future as a certainty, if A happens, then B will happen, then C will happen (faulty series of events)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

False dilemma

A

Reducing complex scenarios into black and white choices of either or

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bandwagon

A

“Everyone else does this… you should too!”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Appeal to authority

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Red herring

A

Introduce point only with surface level connection, shift focus from debate, not rlly an answer (ex. A politician is asked to explain why the unemployment rate has risen despite implementing their policies. The politician replies, “I have been working incredibly hard since I entered office, and I think the citizens can see this.”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Post hoc fallacy

A

Smth that comes before MUST be the cause of smth that comes after w/o proof of causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Equivocation

A

Misinterpretations/multiple meanings of words or unclear phrasing that tricks readers (words will mean one thing in one portion and mean another in another portion ex. I have the right to live, therefore its right for me to live)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hasty generalization

A

Considering patterns of 1 or two examples instead of actual research (my stomach hurt after eating 15 pounds of peanuts so i must be allergic to peanuts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Appeal to authority

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Appeal to money

A
17
Q

You’re another (tu quoque)

A

Arguments which point to another side’s hypocrisy doing the same thing rather than addressing the actual issue

18
Q

False authority

A

An argument equating authority in one field to authority in another

19
Q

Appeal to ignorance

A

must be true bcz no one has ever proven that it isnt

20
Q

false causality (category, not type of fallacy)

A

something inrelated causes another