Logical Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Slippery Slope

A

This is a conclusion based on the premise that if A happens, then eventually through a series of small steps, through B, C,…, X, Y, Z will happen, too, basically equating A and Z. So, if we don’t want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either.

Ex:
If we ban Hummers because they are bad for the environment eventually the government will ban all cars, so we should not ban Hummers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hasty Generalization

A

This is a conclusion based on insufficient or biased evidence. In other words, you are rushing to a conclusion before you have all the relevant facts.

Ex:
Even though it’s only the first day, I can tell this is going to be a boring course.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

A

This is a conclusion that assumes that if ‘A’ occurred after ‘B’ then ‘B’ must have caused ‘A.’

Ex:
I drank bottled water and now I am sick, so the water must have made me sick.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Genetic Fallacy

A

This conclusion is based on an argument that the origins of a person, idea, institute, or theory determine its character, nature, or worth.

Ex:
The Volkswagen Beetle is an evil car because it was originally designed by Hitler’s army.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Begging the Claim

A

The conclusion that the writer should prove is validated within the claim.

Ex:
Filthy and polluting coal should be banned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Circular Argument

A

This restates the argument rather than actually proving it.

Ex. George Bush is a good communicator because he speaks effectively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Either/or

A

This is a conclusion that oversimplifies the argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices.

Ex:
We can either stop using cars or destroy the earth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ad hominem

A

This is an attack on the character of a person rather than his or her opinions or arguments.

Ex:
Green Peace’s strategies aren’t effective because they are all dirty, lazy hippies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ad populum/Bandwagon Appeal

A

This is an appeal that presents what most people, or a group of people think, in order to persuade one to think the same way. Getting on the bandwagon is one such instance of an ad populum appeal.

Ex:
If you were a true American you would support the rights of people to choose whatever vehicle they want.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Red Herring

A

This is a diversionary tactic that avoids the key issues, often by avoiding opposing arguments rather than addressing them.

Ex:
The level of mercury in seafood may be unsafe, but what will fishers do to support their families?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Straw Man

A

This move oversimplifies an opponent’s viewpoint and then attacks that hollow argument.

Ex:
People who don’t support the proposed state minimum wage increase hate the poor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moral Equivalence

A

This fallacy compares minor misdeeds with major atrocities, suggesting that both are equally immoral.

Ex:
That parking attendant who gave me a ticket is as bad as Hitler.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly