Logical Fallacies Flashcards
Anecdotal Fallacy
Using a personal experience or an isolated example instead of sound reasoning or compelling evidence
Anne: “I am giving up extreme sports now that I have children. I think I will take up golf.”
Bill: “I wouldn’t do that. Do you remember Charles? He was playing golf when he got hit by a golf-cart. It broke his leg, and he fell over, giving himself a concussion. He was in hospital for a week and still walks with a limp. I would stick to paragliding!”
Anecdotal Fallacy
Using a personal experience or an isolated example instead of sound reasoning or compelling evidence
Anecdotal Fallacy
Appeal to probability
statement that takes something for granted because it would probably be the case
Statement that takes something for granted because it would probably be the case
Appeal to probability
Something can go wrong (premise).
Therefore, something will go wrong (invalid conclusion).
Appeal to probability
argument from fallacy
assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion is false
assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion is false
argument from fallacy
If P, then Q.
P is a fallacious argument.
Therefore, Q is false
argument from fallacy
Base Rate fallacy
making a probability judgment based on conditional probabilities, without taking into account the effect of prior probabilities
making a probability judgment based on conditional probabilities, without taking into account the effect of prior probabilities
Base rate fallacy
John is a man who wears gothic inspired clothing, has long black hair, and listens to death metal. How likely is it that he is a Christian and how likely is it that he is a Satanist?
If people were asked this question, they would likely underestimate the probability of his being a Christian, and overestimate the probability of his being a Satanist.
Base rate fallacy
Conjunction fallacy
assumption that an outcome simultaneously satisfying multiple conditions is more probable than an outcome satisfying a single one of them
assumption that an outcome simultaneously satisfying multiple conditions is more probable than an outcome satisfying a single one of them
Conjunction fallacy
Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations.
Which is more probable?
Linda is a bank teller.
Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement.
The majority of those asked chose option 2
Conjunction fallacy
Masked man fallacy
the substitution of identical designators in a true statement can lead to a false one
the substitution of identical designators in a true statement can lead to a false one
Masked man fallacy
Premise 1: I know who X is.
Premise 2: I do not know who Y is.
Conclusion: Therefore, X is not Y.
Masked man fallacy
Unwarranted assumption fallacy
The fallacy of unwarranted assumption is committed when the conclusion of an argument is based on a premise (implicit or explicit) that is false or unwarranted
To be on the cover of Vogue Magazine, one must be a celebrity or very beautiful.
This month’s cover was a celebrity.
Therefore, this celebrity is not very beautiful.
Affirming a disjunct
If Bill Gates owns Fort Knox, then he is rich.
Bill Gates is rich.
Therefore, Bill Gates owns Fort Knox
Affirming the consequent
If I have the flu, then I have a sore throat.
I have a sore throat.
Therefore, I have the flu.
Affirming the consequent
Every C is B
Every C is A
So, some A is B
Existential fallacy
We don’t read that trash. People who read that trash don’t appreciate real literature. Therefore, we appreciate real literature
Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
No fish are dogs, and no dogs can fly, therefore all fish can fly
Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
appeal to stone
dismissing a claim as absurd without demonstrating proof for its absurdity
dismissing a claim as absurd without demonstrating proof for its absurdity
appeal to stone
Speaker A: Infectious diseases are caused by microbes.
Speaker B: What a ridiculous idea!
Speaker A: How so?
Speaker B: It’s obviously ridiculous
appeal to stone
argument from ignorance
assuming that a claim is true because it has not been or cannot be proven false, or vice versa
assuming that a claim is true because it has not been or cannot be proven false, or vice versa
argument from ignorance
P is too incredible (or: I cannot imagine how P could possibly be true); therefore P must be false.
I cannot imagine how P could possibly be false; therefore P must be true.
argument from incredulity
If P were true then I would know it; in fact I do not know it; therefore P cannot be true.
If P were false then I would know it; in fact I do not know it; therefore P cannot be false.
Argument from self-knowing
“There is no evidence of aliens, and therefore, aliens do not exist”
Absence of evidence
Argument from incredulity
I cannot imagine how this could be true, therefore it must be false
I cannot imagine how this could be true, therefore it must be false
Argument from incredulity
Argument from repitition
signifies that it has been discussed extensively until nobody cares to discuss it anymore
Argument from silence
where the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence, rather than the existence of evidence.[
where the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence, rather than the existence of evidence.[
Argument from silence
Jay: Dude, where are my car keys?
Bob: (says nothing)
Jay: I KNEW you took them!
Argument from silence
argument to moderation
assuming that the compromise between two positions is always correct
“Some would say that hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet, but others claim it is a toxic and dangerous substance. The truth must therefore be somewhere in between.”
argument to moderation
Ad hominem
the evasion of the actual topic by directing an attack at your opponent.
the evasion of the actual topic by directing an attack at your opponent.
Ad hominem
Begging the question
providing what is essentially the conclusion of the argument as a premise
providing what is essentially the conclusion of the argument as a premise
Begging the question
To allow every man an unbounded freedom of speech must always be, on the whole, advantageous to the State, for it is highly conducive to the interests of the community that each individual should enjoy a liberty perfectly unlimited of expressing his sentiments.”
Begging the question
Burden of Proof
I need not prove my claim, you must prove it is false.
I need not prove my claim, you must prove it is false.
Burden of Proof
Circular Reasoning
when the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying to end up with; sometimes called assuming the conclusion.
when the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying to end up with; sometimes called assuming the conclusion.
Circular Reasoning
Wellington is in New Zealand.
Therefore, Wellington is in New Zealand.
Circular Reasoning
Circular cause and consequence
where the consequence of the phenomenon is claimed to be its root cause
where the consequence of the phenomenon is claimed to be its root cause
Circular cause and consequence
Sleeping with one’s shoes on is strongly correlated with waking up with a headache.
Therefore, sleeping with one’s shoes on causes headache.
Circular cause and consequence
Young children who sleep with the light on are much more likely to develop myopia in later life.
Therefore, sleeping with the light on causes myopia
Circular cause and consequence
Continuum Fallacy
improperly rejecting a claim for being imprecise
improperly rejecting a claim for being imprecise
Continuum Fallacy
Fred is clean-shaven now. If a person has no beard, one more day of growth will not cause them to have a beard. Therefore Fred can never grow a beard.
Continuum Fallacy
Correlation proves causation
faulty assumption that correlation between two variables implies that one causes the other
faulty assumption that correlation between two variables implies that one causes the other
Correlation proves causation
“I can’t help thinking that you are the cause of this problem; we never had any problem with the furnace until you moved into the apartment.”
Correlation proves causation
The number of vaccines children are receiving is increasing, and the number of children who are being diagnosed with autism at some time after being vaccinated is on the rise. Therefore, vaccines must cause autism.
Correlation proves causation
Suppressed correlative
where a correlative is redefined so that one alternative is made impossible
where a correlative is redefined so that one alternative is made impossible
Suppressed correlative
Person 1: “Things are either mysterious or not mysterious. Exactly when an earthquake will strike is still a mystery, but how blood circulates in the body is not.”
Person 2: “Everything is mysterious. There are still things to be learned about how blood circulates.”
Suppressed correlative
Equivocation
the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning (by glossing over which meaning is intended at a particular time)
the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning (by glossing over which meaning is intended at a particular time)
Equivocation
A feather is light.
What is light cannot be dark.
Therefore, a feather cannot be dark.
Equivocation
All jackasses have long ears.
Carl is a jackass.
Therefore, Carl has long ears.
Equivocation
Ecological Fallacy
inferences about the nature of specific individuals are based solely upon aggregate statistics collected for the group to which those individuals belong.
inferences about the nature of specific individuals are based solely upon aggregate statistics collected for the group to which those individuals belong.
Ecological Fallacy
if a particular group of people is measured to have a lower average IQ than the general population, we conclude that a randomly selected member of the group is more likely to have a lower IQ than the average general population.
Ecological Fallacy
Etymological Fallacy
the original or historical meaning of a word or phrase is necessarily similar to its actual present-day usage.
the original or historical meaning of a word or phrase is necessarily similar to its actual present-day usage.
Etymological Fallacy
From the fact that logos is Greek for “word”, Stuart Chase concluded in his book The Tyranny of Words[5] that logic was mere manipulation of words
Etymological Fallacy
Fallacy of Accent
a specific type of ambiguity that arises when the meaning of a sentence is changed by placing an unusual prosodic stress, or when, in a written passage, it’s left unclear which word the emphasis was supposed to fall on.
a specific type of ambiguity that arises when the meaning of a sentence is changed by placing an unusual prosodic stress, or when, in a written passage, it’s left unclear which word the emphasis was supposed to fall on.
Fallacy of Accent
I didn’t take the test yesterday. (Somebody else did.)
I didn’t take the test yesterday. (I did not take it.)
I didn’t take the test yesterday. (I did something else with it.)
I didn’t take the test yesterday. (I took a different one.)
I didn’t take the test yesterday. (I took something else.)
I didn’t take the test yesterday. (I took it some other day.)
Fallacy of Accent
Fallacy of Composition
assuming that something true of part of a whole must also be true of the whole
assuming that something true of part of a whole must also be true of the whole
Fallacy of Composition
All cells are aquatic. Therefore, all organisms (which are composed of cells) are aquatic.
Fallacy of Composition
If someone stands up out of his seat at a cricket match, he can see better. Therefore, if everyone stands up they can all see better.
Fallacy of Composition
If a runner runs faster, he can win the race. Therefore, if all the runners run faster, they can all win the race
Fallacy of Composition
Fallacy of Division
assuming that something true of a thing must also be true of all or some of its parts.
assuming that something true of a thing must also be true of all or some of its parts.
Fallacy of Division
A Boeing 747 can fly unaided across the ocean.
A Boeing 747 has jet engines.
Therefore, one of its jet engines can fly unaided across the ocean.
Fallacy of division
False Attribution
an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated source in support of an argument.
an advocate appeals to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased or fabricated source in support of an argument.
False Attribution
But professor, I got all these facts from a program I saw on TV once… I don’t remember the name of it though.
False Attribution
Claim X is made.
Source Y, a fake or unverifiable source, is use to verify claim X.
Therefore, claim X is true.
False Attribution
Fallacy of Quoting Context
refers to the selective excerpting of words from their original context in a way that distorts the source’s intended meaning.[
False Authority
using an expert of dubious credentials or using only one opinion to sell a product or idea.
using an expert of dubious credentials or using only one opinion to sell a product or idea.
False Authority
In 1923, leading American zoologist Theophilus Painter declared based on his findings that humans had 24 pairs of chromosomes. From the 1920s to the 1950s, this continued to be held based on Painter’s authority,[25] despite subsequent counts totaling the correct number of 23.[26] Even textbooks with photos clearly showing 23 pairs incorrectly declared the number to be 24 based on the authority of the then-consensus of 24 pairs.
False Authority
Smith says X is true
Smith is an expert
So X must be true
False Appeal to Authority
False Dilemma
two alternative statements are held to be the only possible options, when in reality there are more
two alternative statements are held to be the only possible options, when in reality there are more
False Dilemma
“Either the nobles of this country appear wealthy, in which case they can be taxed for good; or they appear poor, in which case they are living frugally and must have immense savings, which can be taxed for good.”
False Dilemma
False Equivalence
describing a situation of logical and apparent equivalence, when in fact there is none.
describing a situation of logical and apparent equivalence, when in fact there is none.
False Equivalence
“We all bleed red. We’re all no different from each other.
False Equivalence
“They’re both soft, cuddly pets. There’s no difference between a cat and a dog.”
False Equivalence
Fallacy of many questions (loaded question)
someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all the people involved.
someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all the people involved.
Fallacy of many questions (loaded question)
Where did you hide the gun? [assumes that you hid the gun]
How often do you do that? [assumes that you do it at least sometimes]
Fallacy of many questions (loaded question)
Fallacy of the single cause
it is assumed that there is one, simple cause of an outcome when in reality it may have been caused by a number of only jointly sufficient causes.
it is assumed that there is one, simple cause of an outcome when in reality it may have been caused by a number of only jointly sufficient causes.
Fallacy of the single cause
The recent drop in crime in our neighborhood is due to better policing.
Fallacy of single cause
Furtive Fallacy
outcomes are asserted to have been caused by the malfeasance of decision makers.
outcomes are asserted to have been caused by the malfeasance of decision makers.
Furtive Fallacy
“The new health care law was designed to destroy the United States.”
Furtive Fallacy
Gambler’s Fallacy
the incorrect belief that separate, independent events can affect the likelihood of another random event
the incorrect belief that separate, independent events can affect the likelihood of another random event
Gambler’s Fallacy
If a fair coin lands on heads 10 times in a row, the belief that it is “due to the number of times it had previously landed on tails” is incorrect
Gambler’s Fallacy
Historian’s Fallacy
occurs when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision
occurs when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision
Historian’s Fallacy
Claim X was made in the past.
Those who made the claim, did not take into consideration Y, which was not available to them at the time.
Therefore, this was a foolish claim.
Historian’s Fallacy
You should have never taken the back roads to the concert. If you had taken the main roads, you would not have been stuck in all that traffic due to the accident.
Historian’s Fallacy
Inflation of conflict
The experts of a field of knowledge disagree on a certain point, so the scholars must know nothing, and therefore the legitimacy of their entire field is put to question
The experts of a field of knowledge disagree on a certain point, so the scholars must know nothing, and therefore the legitimacy of their entire field is put to question
Inflation of conflict
Authority A disagrees with Authority B on issue X.
Therefore, we can say nothing meaningful about issue X.
Inflation of conflict
My mom says that I should study for at least 2 hours each night, and my dad says just a half hour should be fine. Neither one of them knows what they are talking about, so I should just skip studying altogether.
Inflation of conflict
If-by-whiskey
an argument that supports both sides of an issue by using terms that are selectively emotionally sensitive.
an argument that supports both sides of an issue by using terms that are selectively emotionally sensitive.
if-by-whiskey
incomplete comparison
in which insufficient information is provided to make a complete comparison.
in which insufficient information is provided to make a complete comparison.
incomplete comparison
“product X is better”
incomplete comparison
inconsistent comparison (apples vs oranges)
where different methods of comparison are used, leaving one with a false impression of the whole comparison.
where different methods of comparison are used, leaving one with a false impression of the whole comparison.
inconsistent comparison (apples vs oranges)
intentionality fallacy
the insistence that the ultimate meaning of an expression must be consistent with the intention of the person from whom the communication originated
the insistence that the ultimate meaning of an expression must be consistent with the intention of the person from whom the communication originated
intentionality fallacy
if a 5-year old drew a picture of a cat, but I thought it looked more like a horse, I can’t judge the picture on the 5-year old’s intention for it to be a cat.
intentionality fallacy
p or q.
p.
Therefore, not-q.
p or q.
q.
Therefore, not-p.
Affirming a disjunct
Person 1: “All things are either X or not X.” (The correlatives: X–not X.)
Person 2: “I define X such that all things that you claim are not X are included in X.” (The suppressed correlative: not X.)
Suppressed correlative
using multiple, jointly inconsistent arguments to defend a position
Kettle logic
the belief that the outcomes of non-regulated random occurrences can be encapsulated by a statistic; a failure to take into account unknown unknowns in determining the probability of events taking place.
Ludic Fallacy
organized competitive fighting trains the athlete to focus on the game and, in order not to dissipate his concentration, to ignore the possibility of what is not specifically allowed by the rules, such as kicks to the groin, a surprise knife, et cetera. So those who win gold medal might be precisely those who will be most vulnerable in real life.
example of the Ludic Fallacy
assuming that whichever aspect of nature which has socially unpleasant consequences cannot exist. Its typical form is “if X were true, then it would happen that Z!”, where Z is a morally, socially or politically undesirable thing.
moralistic fallacy
Eating meat harms animals and the environment, and so no one has physiological use for it
Example of moralistic fallacy
Men and women ought to be given equal opportunities, and so women and men can do everything equally well.
example of moralistic fallacy
Unfaithfulness is immoral, and so it is unnatural to feel desire for others when in a monogamous relationship.
example of moralistic fallacy
argument in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded.
moving the goalposts
what is found in nature is automatically assumed to be good
naturalistic fallacy
when solutions to problems are rejected because they are not perfect
Nirvana Fallacy
These anti-drunk driving ad campaigns are not going to work. People are still going to drink and drive no matter what.
example of Nirvana fallacy
Seat belts are a bad idea. People are still going to die in car crashes.
example of Nirvana fallacy
A occurred, then B occurred.
Therefore, A caused B
post hoc ergo propter hoc
“I can’t help thinking that you are the cause of this problem; we never had any problem with the furnace until you moved into the apartment.” The manager of the apartment house, on no stated grounds other than the temporal priority of the new tenant’s occupancy, holds that the tenant’s presence has some causal relationship to the furnace’s becoming faulty
post hoc ergo propter hoc example
suppose a person buys a good luck charm, does well on his exam, and then concludes that the good luck charm caused him to do well.
post hoc ergo propter hoc example
Bill purchases a new PowerMac and it works fine for months. He then buys and installs a new piece of software. The next time he starts up his Mac, it freezes. Bill concludes that the software must be the cause of the freeze.
post hoc ergo propter hoc example
Joan is scratched by a cat while visiting her friend. Two days later she comes down with a fever. Joan concludes that the cat’s scratch must be the cause of her illness.
post hoc ergo propter hoc example
The Republicans pass a new tax reform law that benefits wealthly Americans. Shortly thereafter the economy takes a nose dive. The Democrats claim that the the tax reform caused the economic woes and they push to get rid of it
post hoc ergo propter hoc example
The picture on Jim’s old TV set goes out of focus. Jim goes over and strikes the TV soundly on the side and the picture goes back into focus. Jim tells his friend that hitting the TV fixed it.
post hoc ergo propter hoc example
an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction.[1] Sometimes, this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted
proof by assertion
This practice can be observed in the use of political slogans, and the distribution of “talking points”, which are collections of short phrases that are issued to members of modern political parties for recitation to achieve maximum message repetition. The technique is also sometimes used in advertising
proof by assertion
submission of others to an argument too complex and verbose to reasonably deal with in all its intimate details
proof by verbosity
a low probability of false matches does not mean a low probability of some false match being found
prosecutor’s fallacy
a perpetrator is known to have the same blood type as a defendant and 10% of the population share that blood type, then to argue on that basis alone that the probability of the defendant being guilty is 90% an example of —–
example of prosecutor’s fallacy
using a form of argument that, if it were valid, could be used more generally to reach an absurd conclusion.
proving too much
an observer presupposes the objectivity of his own perspective when analyzing a behavioral event.
psychologist’s fallacy