Logical Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

5 types of Logical Fallacies

A
Distorting the Issue
Sabotaging the Argument
Drawing Faulty Conclusions
Misusing Evidence 
Misusing Language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

6 ways of Distorting an Issue

A
Bare Assertion
Begging the Question
Oversimplification
Either/Or Thinking
Complex Question
Straw Man
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

6 ways to Sabotage an argument

A
Red Herring
Misuse Humor
Appeal to Pity
Use of Threats
Bandwagon Mentality
Appeal to Popular Sentiment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4 Ways to draw Faulty Conclusions from Evidence

A

Appeal to Ignorance
Hasty or Broad Generalization
False Cause
Slippery Slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

6 Misuse of Evidence

A
Impressing with numbers
Half-Truths
Unrelated Testimonial
Attack against the person
Hypothesis Contrary to the fact
False Anology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3 Misuse of Language

A

Obfuscation
Ambiguity
Slanted Language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bare Assertion

A

deny that it exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Begging the Question

A

circular reasoning, assuming as the basis of your argument the very point you need to prove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Oversimplification

A

reduces complexity to simplicity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Either/Or Thinking

A

Also known as black-and-white or dualistic thinking this fallacy reduces all options to two extremes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Complex Question

A

phrasing a question a certain way, so to ignores or covers up a more basic question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Straw Man

A

an argument against a claim that is easily refuted. Typically, an claim exaggerates or misrepresents the opponents’ position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Red Herring

A

a volatile idea that pulls readers away from the real issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Misuse of Humour

A

used to distract or mocks, it undercuts the argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Appeal to Pity

A

a misleading tug on the heartstrings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Use of Threats

A

usually the implied negative consequences of continued disagreement

17
Q

Bandwagon Mentality

A

manipulates people’s desire to belong or be accepted by claiming the majority must be correct

18
Q

Appeal to Popular Sentiment

A

associating a position with something popularly loved

19
Q

Appeal to Ignorance

A

shift the burden of proof onto someone else.

20
Q

Hasty or Broad Generalization

A

a claim is based on too little evidence or allows no exceptions.

21
Q

False Cause

A

confuse sequence with causation:

22
Q

Slippery Slope

A

a single step will start an unstoppable chain of events

23
Q

Impressing with Numbers

A

statistics and numbers that overwhelm them into agreement. In addition, the numbers haven’t been properly interpreted.

24
Q

Half-Truths

A

contains part of but not the whole truth. Because it leaves out “the rest of the story,” it is both true and false simultaneously

25
Q

Unreliable Testimonial

A

appeal to authority not qualified in the proper field

26
Q

Hypothesis Contrary to Fact

A

pure speculation, a claim cannot be tested.

27
Q

False Analogy

A

argue that X is good (or bad) because it is like Y. Such an analogy may be valid, but it weakens the argument if the grounds for the comparison are vague or unrelated.

28
Q

Obfuscation

A

using fuzzy terms to muddy the issue.make simple ideas sound more profound than they really are, or they may make false ideas sound true.

29
Q

Ambiguity

A

Ambiguous statements can be interpreted in two or more opposite ways to obscure a position

30
Q

Slanted Language

A

words with strong connotations used to draw one away from the logic of an argumen

31
Q

Ethos

A

believe the argument because of the chariot of the speeker

32
Q

Logos

A

appeal from logic and reason

33
Q

Pathos

A

emotional appeal